BiggTipp Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 108 Content Count: 2,484 Reputation: 288 Days Won: 1 Joined: 04/26/2005 Share Posted January 2, 2020 7 minutes ago, Jonesy Bull said: Looks like an upgrade for the most part, but we have to remember this is CUSA level football, so its a little apples vs oranges. Also, don't particularly like the Pass Defense stat - looks like a downgrade there! Is it really though? I would say more like oranges vs grapefruit. CUSA level football destroyed SMU which destroyed us. Also, when was the last time we beat a CUSA team? We are 0 for the last 3..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls On Parade Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 10,199 Reputation: 1,714 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/02/2005 Share Posted January 2, 2020 Just now, BiggTipp said: Is it really though? I would say more like oranges vs grapefruit. CUSA level football destroyed SMU which destroyed us. Also, when was the last time we beat a CUSA team? We are 0 for the last 3..... Hard to judge the lower level bowl games. FAU also lost bad vs Ucf when it really counted and that was at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowdown Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 993 Reputation: 121 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/05/2007 Share Posted January 2, 2020 Basically we can hire coaches who A. have had success in equal roles at lower levels, B.success in lower roles at equal or higher levels, C. success in equal or higher roles at equal or higher levels yet available due to circumstances, D. or coaches who failed at higher levels. We could find plenty of examples of successes and failures from each group. Tell me why they are a bad hire not just point out that they are from one of the groups that they are of course going to fall in to FAU just smashed one of the top teams in our conference. Other than ego why would we not have wanted to be FAU North this year. Theoretically they will eventually have better talent here too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapelbull Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted January 2, 2020 6 minutes ago, slowdown said: Basically we can hire coaches who A. have had success in equal roles at lower levels, B.success in lower roles at equal or higher levels, C. success in equal or higher roles at equal or higher levels yet available due to circumstances, D. or coaches who failed at higher levels. We could find plenty of examples of successes and failures from each group. Tell me why they are a bad hire not just point out that they are from one of the groups that they are of course going to fall in to FAU just smashed one of the top teams in our conference. Other than ego why would we not have wanted to be FAU North this year. Theoretically they will eventually have better talent here too. I'm not sure anyone here has said they were going to fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jonesy Bull Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 10 minutes ago, BiggTipp said: Is it really though? I would say more like oranges vs grapefruit. CUSA level football destroyed SMU which destroyed us. Also, when was the last time we beat a CUSA team? We are 0 for the last 3..... I think it is still more apples to oranges. I get that FAU destroyed Temple, and that was quite impressive. But it was a meaningless Bowl Game, so you have to wonder how much of Temple's heart was in it. I think the majority of the Cusa teams would struggle mightily against the AAC teams if they played each other throughout the entire season. FAU is at the top of that conference right now, so if we were to raid any Cusa coaches, that would be the best school to target. I don't have a problem with this approach. But these coaches are in for an upgrade in competition and they will need to be ready for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggTipp Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 108 Content Count: 2,484 Reputation: 288 Days Won: 1 Joined: 04/26/2005 Share Posted January 2, 2020 33 minutes ago, Jonesy Bull said: I think it is still more apples to oranges. I get that FAU destroyed Temple, and that was quite impressive. But it was a meaningless Bowl Game, so you have to wonder how much of Temple's heart was in it. I think the majority of the Cusa teams would struggle mightily against the AAC teams if they played each other throughout the entire season. FAU is at the top of that conference right now, so if we were to raid any Cusa coaches, that would be the best school to target. I don't have a problem with this approach. But these coaches are in for an upgrade in competition and they will need to be ready for that. and the hopeful thing is an upgrade in talent to go against the upgrade in competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted January 2, 2020 The two kinds of TBP posters: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrush33 Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,803 Reputation: 792 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Share Posted January 2, 2020 1 hour ago, Jonesy Bull said: Looks like an upgrade for the most part, but we have to remember this is CUSA level football, so its a little apples vs oranges. Also, don't particularly like the Pass Defense stat - looks like a downgrade there! Do you see what they did to SMU? I'm sold!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullAdrian Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 52 Content Count: 1,290 Reputation: 54 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/19/2004 Share Posted January 2, 2020 xWVU Pat White to be our RB coach? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friscobull Posted January 2, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 7 Content Count: 10,878 Reputation: 3,993 Days Won: 67 Joined: 05/23/2019 Share Posted January 2, 2020 57 minutes ago, Jonesy Bull said: I think it is still more apples to oranges. I get that FAU destroyed Temple, and that was quite impressive. But it was a meaningless Bowl Game, so you have to wonder how much of Temple's heart was in it. I think the majority of the Cusa teams would struggle mightily against the AAC teams if they played each other throughout the entire season. FAU is at the top of that conference right now, so if we were to raid any Cusa coaches, that would be the best school to target. I don't have a problem with this approach. But these coaches are in for an upgrade in competition and they will need to be ready for that. They destroyed SMU not Temple and really is oranges and grapefruits, FAU probably would have whipped us last year. I have no idea how this will work out but at least it beats the alternative of having the waste of space come back for a 4th year, we have hope if nothing else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now