Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Revisiting the Charlie Strong Hire


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  148
  • Content Count:  5,900
  • Reputation:   628
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  09/02/2007

Brad
This post was recognized by Brad!

Orlando Bull was awarded the badge 'Great Content' and 10 points.

Its hard to compare.

Holtz - got left with a talented roster, but some players and certainly a ton of us fans were not happy with how he came to be our coach. I supported him and hoped for the best, but in the end, when things started going south, it was too easy to say that we should have never fired CJL.

Tags was a good fit here, he's a bad coach in my opinion, but he knew that he could recruit better talent than our opponents in most cases. He was very close to shooting himself in the foot by holding on to his own offense for too long and not letting Q do his thing. His teams out-talented their way to most wins, not some masterful coaching by him.

CCS - I was a fan of this hire. I think Strong is a decent coach and was at one time a tremendous recruiter. I think the Texas job was bad for him because his recruiting ties were to Florida. At UL, they are fine with recruiting FL, but in Texas, there is plenty of local talent, why come to FL to get players. I think he failed there because he couldn't quite get his footing. When he came here, I hoped that he would work hard and use his connections to get back in the game, but I think he looked at this job as "beneath" him and not worthy of working hard for. I would bet that he negotiated against himself saying "i am not going to waste my energy recruiting that guy, he's going somewhere better". His heart wasn't in this job, and that was clear pretty much from day 1. I think as a coach, he had the chops to succeed here, but you can't force someone to actually apply themselves.

CJS - I don't know. CCS didn't leave him much, but he never really fit in here. Ultimately, we need someone maybe a little rough around the edges and he's too "clean" for our program. We're surrounded by talent, but would Q or JPP, or Mack, or DJ, or anyone else really... have been wowed by Jeff Scott? Then, he couldn't settle on any real scheme, didn't seem like a teaching style coach. Maybe good for donors, but showed no progress on the field. Definitely our worst hire. The others probably all could have been successful under certain circumstances or attitudes, I think that no amount of change around this guy would have made him successful here.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  119
  • Content Count:  6,568
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  09/02/2014

25 minutes ago, Orlando Bull said:

Its hard to compare.

Holtz - got left with a talented roster, but some players and certainly a ton of us fans were not happy with how he came to be our coach. I supported him and hoped for the best, but in the end, when things started going south, it was too easy to say that we should have never fired CJL.

Tags was a good fit here, he's a bad coach in my opinion, but he knew that he could recruit better talent than our opponents in most cases. He was very close to shooting himself in the foot by holding on to his own offense for too long and not letting Q do his thing. His teams out-talented their way to most wins, not some masterful coaching by him.

CCS - I was a fan of this hire. I think Strong is a decent coach and was at one time a tremendous recruiter. I think the Texas job was bad for him because his recruiting ties were to Florida. At UL, they are fine with recruiting FL, but in Texas, there is plenty of local talent, why come to FL to get players. I think he failed there because he couldn't quite get his footing. When he came here, I hoped that he would work hard and use his connections to get back in the game, but I think he looked at this job as "beneath" him and not worthy of working hard for. I would bet that he negotiated against himself saying "i am not going to waste my energy recruiting that guy, he's going somewhere better". His heart wasn't in this job, and that was clear pretty much from day 1. I think as a coach, he had the chops to succeed here, but you can't force someone to actually apply themselves.

CJS - I don't know. CCS didn't leave him much, but he never really fit in here. Ultimately, we need someone maybe a little rough around the edges and he's too "clean" for our program. We're surrounded by talent, but would Q or JPP, or Mack, or DJ, or anyone else really... have been wowed by Jeff Scott? Then, he couldn't settle on any real scheme, didn't seem like a teaching style coach. Maybe good for donors, but showed no progress on the field. Definitely our worst hire. The others probably all could have been successful under certain circumstances or attitudes, I think that no amount of change around this guy would have made him successful here.

This is HANDS down the best analysis of all non-Levitt coaches. As for Levitt, as much as I liked him, he started to become an underachiever in his last few years. We always seem to have had a slump once November hits. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  469
  • Content Count:  4,451
  • Reputation:   52
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/27/2001

Living 30 miles north of Austin TX since 2007, I was pretty sure CCS was going to struggle.  I did have hope CCS would recruit better in FL than he did in TX.  Without Quinton Flowers that first year the CCS would be a bad as the last guy.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  194
  • Content Count:  6,784
  • Reputation:   863
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  08/01/2000

57 minutes ago, BullDoug said:

Living 30 miles north of Austin TX since 2007,

Nice to hear from you again, it's been some time. 😎

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,331
  • Content Count:  97,070
  • Reputation:   10,843
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

Yep @BullDoug is now a manual add to the OGs
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  44
  • Content Count:  2,035
  • Reputation:   1,410
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  06/29/2007

Just for sake of relative comparison, here's a chart of coaches performance per year along with their strength of schedule. Performance is based on Jeff Sagarin's college football algorithm-based ratings. Strength of schedule sourced from TeamRankings.com.

image.thumb.png.6290e4dbec88b35c8b03999e79afdfcf.png

  • Upvote 2
  • Go Bulls! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  43
  • Content Count:  3,899
  • Reputation:   871
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  12/10/2006

3 hours ago, Orlando Bull said:

Its hard to compare.

Holtz - got left with a talented roster, but some players and certainly a ton of us fans were not happy with how he came to be our coach. I supported him and hoped for the best, but in the end, when things started going south, it was too easy to say that we should have never fired CJL.

Tags was a good fit here, he's a bad coach in my opinion, but he knew that he could recruit better talent than our opponents in most cases. He was very close to shooting himself in the foot by holding on to his own offense for too long and not letting Q do his thing. His teams out-talented their way to most wins, not some masterful coaching by him.

CCS - I was a fan of this hire. I think Strong is a decent coach and was at one time a tremendous recruiter. I think the Texas job was bad for him because his recruiting ties were to Florida. At UL, they are fine with recruiting FL, but in Texas, there is plenty of local talent, why come to FL to get players. I think he failed there because he couldn't quite get his footing. When he came here, I hoped that he would work hard and use his connections to get back in the game, but I think he looked at this job as "beneath" him and not worthy of working hard for. I would bet that he negotiated against himself saying "i am not going to waste my energy recruiting that guy, he's going somewhere better". His heart wasn't in this job, and that was clear pretty much from day 1. I think as a coach, he had the chops to succeed here, but you can't force someone to actually apply themselves.

CJS - I don't know. CCS didn't leave him much, but he never really fit in here. Ultimately, we need someone maybe a little rough around the edges and he's too "clean" for our program. We're surrounded by talent, but would Q or JPP, or Mack, or DJ, or anyone else really... have been wowed by Jeff Scott? Then, he couldn't settle on any real scheme, didn't seem like a teaching style coach. Maybe good for donors, but showed no progress on the field. Definitely our worst hire. The others probably all could have been successful under certain circumstances or attitudes, I think that no amount of change around this guy would have made him successful here.

It's been stated elsewhere that he thought he was going to get P5 calls after a 10-win campaign in 2017 and when they didn't come, he "became disheartened" with the job and didn't really wanna be here. I'd argue in that instance, he never actually wanted to be here. Allegedly his family still thinks he got a raw deal here even though he took a program with a 40+PPG offense and turned it into a raging dumpster fire

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  23
  • Content Count:  10,201
  • Reputation:   1,714
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/02/2005

Only plus in all this is Taggart atleast shows we can win here with talent and semi decent coaching. 

Unfortunately we had horrible coaches back to back..can't afford 3. 

CAG atleast has shown he can recruit now we find out soon about his coaching. 

Edited by Bulls On Parade
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,615
  • Content Count:  74,712
  • Reputation:   10,931
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

3 hours ago, Gatorbull325 said:

This is HANDS down the best analysis of all non-Leavitt coaches. As for Leavitt, as much as I liked him, he started to become an underachiever in his last few years. We always seem to have had a slump once November hits. 

Hardly ..... if there's one thing CJL wasn't, it was an underachiever. He was just the opposite and as dumb as it sounds to some, a case can be made that his overachieving was a double edge sword.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  194
  • Content Count:  6,784
  • Reputation:   863
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  08/01/2000

1 hour ago, Triple B said:

overachieving was a double edge sword.

Now, now! :05-nono: let us tread lightly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    “In my mind, I’m kind of like, ‘OK, excuses over'. We know what we need to do. We’ve got the right team together, and now we move forward, and we’ll evaluate and be accountable to each other, including myself, from this point forward.”

    Michael Kelly  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    We've talked about getting back to being the toughest, most violent people out there. Let's be the best version of ourselves and really get back to the culture of how we (USF) used to step across the line and play anybody. Let's hold on to the culture of when they were tough … and they (opponents) knew it was going to be long damn day for themselves.

    Kevin Patrick  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.