gibbsak Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 2,019 Reputation: 303 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/22/2011 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Is no one going to talk about how this is in the wrong thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,331 Content Count: 97,073 Reputation: 10,843 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,157 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted July 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Gatorbull325 said: If we make the playoffs as a G6, the recruits and money will come regardless. Not at the rate of being in the P5 not even close 1 hour ago, Cubanbull said: Here is reality if those two leave the Big12, what’s left isn’t much better than the AAC and their media contract will be similar money wise so forget that 35 million. The B12 will try to survive by taking 2-4 teams, maybe BYU, Boise and two AAC schools. Or worse case scenario 4 AAC schools. The AAC can add 4. Or even just 1 and with 9 schools play a round robin and still play a championship game. With the new CFP deal, access will be the same whether in newB12 or newAAC. We just need to win. I’m not saying that being in the B12 after it rebrands to some like the AAC from the Beast would be as impactful as $35 million (but it would still be a boost). I am saying that no amount of contingency access makes up for the huge gap between $7 million a year vs these numbers and of course being P5 still matters every bit as much as it did yesterday. They have way more money and way more access and that’s obviously better than a little money and a little narrow sliver of access. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF_rustbucket Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 1 Content Count: 411 Reputation: 200 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/25/2017 Share Posted July 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Cubanbull said: Here is reality if those two leave the Big12, what’s left isn’t much better than the AAC and their media contract will be similar money wise so forget that 35 million. The B12 will try to survive by taking 2-4 teams, maybe BYU, Boise and two AAC schools. Or worse case scenario 4 AAC schools. The AAC can add 4. Or even just 1 and with 9 schools play a round robin and still play a championship game. With the new CFP deal, access will be the same whether in newB12 or newAAC. We just need to win. Slightly disagree. The new B12 would remain in the top 5 for the new CFP, especially if they add the top 4 from the AAC. But the new AAC without their top 4 is no longer a clear #6. It would depend on who the backfills are. You can forget about any of the top MWC teams joining a depleted AAC, so it's the usual CUSA SBC suspects. Get the right ones and you have a contender for #6 along with the MWC. But if the top targets stay put, oof. Dumpster fire. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubanbull Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 295 Content Count: 6,845 Reputation: 1,110 Days Won: 22 Joined: 12/23/2001 Share Posted July 22, 2021 17 minutes ago, UCF_rustbucket said: Slightly disagree. The new B12 would remain in the top 5 for the new CFP, especially if they add the top 4 from the AAC. But the new AAC without their top 4 is no longer a clear #6. It would depend on who the backfills are. You can forget about any of the top MWC teams joining a depleted AAC, so it's the usual CUSA SBC suspects. Get the right ones and you have a contender for #6 along with the MWC. But if the top targets stay put, oof. Dumpster fire. We really do not know who they will add. Additions by league will not be the top teams but the schools that they feel will give them a bigger media contract. You are also forgetting that Boise and BYU will also be in picture. So the AAC might only lose 2. After losing Texas they more likely will look at Houston as a replacement and UC will help breach the gap to WV. So the AAC might not be as damaged as you might think and might still look at MWC additions to keep at #6. Lets wait and see what happens but one thing I can guarantee you is that a Big12 without OU and UT will drop dramatically in tv money and will not be much better than the current AAC so doubt they get more than 10 million per team. And getting more than one team in a 12 team playoff would be a stretch. That Big12 will be only slightly better than current AAC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted July 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, Cubanbull said: We really do not know who they will add. Additions by league will not be the top teams but the schools that they feel will give them a bigger media contract. You are also forgetting that Boise and BYU will also be in picture. So the AAC might only lose 2. After losing Texas they more likely will look at Houston as a replacement and UC will help breach the gap to WV. So the AAC might not be as damaged as you might think and might still look at MWC additions to keep at #6. Lets wait and see what happens but one thing I can guarantee you is that a Big12 without OU and UT will drop dramatically in tv money and will not be much better than the current AAC so doubt they get more than 10 million per team. And getting more than one team in a 12 team playoff would be a stretch. That Big12 will be only slightly better than current AAC. Not to mention the fact that the PAC may invite KSU and ISU, etc. KU would certainly be a candidate for the Big10. On top of that Missouri and TAMU are against this and could be looking for two more no votes to block all of this. There are a lot of moving pieces going forward. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted July 22, 2021 (edited) Y'all need to prepare yourself. Come to terms with it. Embrace it now. USF is going to get left behind. Again. For the second time in the last decade. Conf. realignment is made at the president level USF has no president. If the Big 12 survives (and I am not convinced it will), they will try to pick off the best AAC schools they can. USF will not be among them, unless there is a complete merger. USF will be left in CUSA 7.0 in a much lower conf. than the current AAC. Prepare yourself and come to terms with that now. You will be better off. Who's running the ship at USF? Edited July 22, 2021 by BullsFanInTX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roaming Bull Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 9,756 Reputation: 2,174 Days Won: 25 Joined: 09/20/2014 Share Posted July 22, 2021 TL:DR the only correct response to this act of SEC aggression is to create the nSEC. It will be: TCU, Tex Tech, Baylor, SMU, UH, Tulsa, kState, KU East: USF, UCF, WV, Navy, ECU, Tulane, Memphis, the last team would be a random other school like (fau, FIU, UAB, App State, Coastal Cackalacky, or another value adding school) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
negron2002 Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 9 Content Count: 237 Reputation: 33 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/24/2009 Share Posted July 22, 2021 6 hours ago, Roaming Bull said: TL:DR the only correct response to this act of SEC aggression is to create the nSEC. It will be: TCU, Tex Tech, Baylor, SMU, UH, Tulsa, kState, KU East: USF, UCF, WV, Navy, ECU, Tulane, Memphis, the last team would be a random other school like (fau, FIU, UAB, App State, Coastal Cackalacky, or another value adding school) Add Cincinnati to the East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulledOver Posted July 22, 2021 Group: Member Topic Count: 58 Content Count: 3,576 Reputation: 858 Days Won: 6 Joined: 08/07/2017 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Wow! You mean to tell me that this article didn't make it to the Conference Realignment Epic Pages?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now