NewEnglandBull Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, puc86 said: I am not you are being unreasonable by not recognizing my logic and reason is infallible and I have provided far more support than is the typical retort of but time and I wish things to be different than reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrassBulls12 Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 399 Content Count: 4,679 Reputation: 517 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/03/2017 Share Posted March 10, 2020 The Big East would have been regulated to the G5 even if the defections had stayed. They left becaue they knew that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheBus Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 15 Content Count: 740 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/02/2011 Share Posted March 10, 2020 36 minutes ago, puc86 said: I am not you are being unreasonable by not recognizing my logic and reason is infallible and I have provided far more support than is the typical retort of but time and I wish things to be different than reality. Quote So you want me to be more objective, fair and argue in good faith? I do not think that is a very good strategy for a propagandist. Step one look for the most exploitable parts of an argument or poster and create a characterization, step two paint the target with that characterization, step three attack that characterization, step four turn the target into that characterization, step five win. See in zero of the steps is there room for reasonable honest dialogue, the goal is to win the argument and not to have the nicest most fruitful conversation, you are asking me to internet wrong. Seriously folks, just start responding to Puc by throwing back his prior comments on being a propagandist in his face. Just make that the default response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,250 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted March 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, OnTheBus said: Seriously folks, just start responding to Puc by throwing back his prior comments on being a propagandist in his face. Just make that the default response. I think you ideas and responses are closer to what was being discussed for the penalty box than my responses which are typically not attacking, not personal, consistent and well reasoned ( even if everyone may not agree with them most can understand where I am coming from). I think the times I have quoted you in regards to this thread is to say you are right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_Bullnard_Shaw Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 55 Content Count: 6,740 Reputation: 1,743 Days Won: 17 Joined: 11/04/2012 Share Posted March 10, 2020 1 hour ago, puc86 said: I think you ideas and responses are closer to what was being discussed for the penalty box than my responses which are typically not attacking, not personal, consistent and well reasoned ( even if everyone may not agree with them most can understand where I am coming from). I think the times I have quoted you in regards to this thread is to say you are right. Would it be a penalty box infraction if I hypothesize that you are an artificial intelligence meant to be frustrating to people without being rude or making personal attacks with a reasonable amount of humor in the algorithm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,250 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted March 10, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said: Would it be a penalty box infraction if I hypothesize that you are an artificial intelligence meant to be frustrating to people without being rude or making personal attacks with a reasonable amount of humor in the algorithm? Sounds fairly spot on and I’m not concerned about getting anyone else penalized I think we can use all the fans we can gather. Edited March 10, 2020 by puc86 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDYZR Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 486 Content Count: 12,457 Reputation: 2,841 Days Won: 25 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted March 10, 2020 Can football make a quick turnaround? YES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,250 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted March 10, 2020 10 minutes ago, BDYZR said: Can football make a quick turnaround? YES. Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizman Posted March 10, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,332 Content Count: 21,301 Reputation: 909 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Share Posted March 10, 2020 Sure, it will be a better overall team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 11, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 11, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, OnTheBus said: Seriously folks, just start responding to Puc by throwing back his prior comments on being a propagandist in his face. Just make that the default response. Next time you get locked into an argument, remember this is someone who claimed Michael Vick and Tim Tebow were drop back passers and not dual-threat in order to try and win the discussion. You're NEVER going to get a concession if that's what you're hoping for. Edited March 11, 2020 by JTrue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now