Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

The elephant in the room


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Content Count:  7,683
  • Reputation:   1,491
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  08/27/2017

6 hours ago, Bull94 said:

 

the ncaa only tests for weed at championship events.

 

 

it's banned regardless of whether they test for it regularly or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,533
  • Reputation:   10,815
  • Days Won:  422
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

7 hours ago, Bull94 said:

might be a bit of difference between a program that has won multiple national championships with a coach and a program that has just lost 6 straight games with a guy that destroyed a much better program in similar fashion.

BTW Bama is losing 1 starter for 1 game which had to do with the NCAA testing . Strong just kicked off 11 players for good.

I know you're into semantics so I'm sure you can appreciate the difference.

A starter for Bama = 11 non starters for USF, but the 1 game versus forever does differentiate so I see that  ...

And being into semantics and all, I also understand the meaning of "destroy" and your use there is another of your usual doses of hyperbole ...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Content Count:  7,683
  • Reputation:   1,491
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  08/27/2017

8 hours ago, Bull94 said:

 

BTW Bama is losing 1 starter for 1 game which had to do with the NCAA testing .

 

You saying this over and over again doesn't make it a true, but hey semantics

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  582
  • Content Count:  22,678
  • Reputation:   5,814
  • Days Won:  108
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

11 hours ago, chapelbull said:

it's banned regardless of whether they test for it regularly or not

But isn't liquor banned for kids under 21?  Do we start doing breathalyzers on Sat nights around midnight and then throwing kids off the team?

Edit: Going back to the article someone posted.  Wasn't it about Rutgers and having kids test positive 5 times before suspension? I may not be remembering correctly and don't want to go look for the article again.  We don't know what CCS's policy is.  Is he a one time and you're done guy?  Or are these kids failing multiple times?  A warning after the first one or two and then suspended after the 3rd I could agree with.  

Edited by CousinRicky
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  22
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

10 hours ago, Triple B said:

A starter for Bama = 11 non starters for USF, but the 1 game versus forever does differentiate so I see that  ...

And being into semantics and all, I also understand the meaning of "destroy" and your use there is another of your usual doses of hyperbole ...

we lost our 2nd leading returning wide receiver for next year in Solomon.

we lost our 2nd leading DT for tackles even though he was suspended for 8 games this year

we lost our 3rd and 4th leading rushers

not to mention Culpepper started in the secondary for us more than once

go ahead and think that he just let go of 3rd stringers but he didn't. when we have no depth again next year just know that this is the reason why.

9 of the 11 had recorded stats for us this year

ok he didn't destroy them he just never had a winning season there and lost to kansas for the first time since 1938 in his 3rd year there

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,013
  • Reputation:   4,544
  • Days Won:  38
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

27 minutes ago, Bull94 said:

ok he didn't destroy them he just never had a winning season there and lost to kansas for the first time since 1938 in his 3rd year there

Losing to Kansas at Texas is funny. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

1 hour ago, Bull94 said:

we lost our 2nd leading returning wide receiver for next year in Solomon.

we lost our 2nd leading DT for tackles even though he was suspended for 8 games this year

we lost our 3rd and 4th leading rushers

not to mention Culpepper started in the secondary for us more than once

go ahead and think that he just let go of 3rd stringers but he didn't. when we have no depth again next year just know that this is the reason why.

9 of the 11 had recorded stats for us this year

ok he didn't destroy them he just never had a winning season there and lost to kansas for the first time since 1938 in his 3rd year there

Solomon could not catch a cold

3rd and 4th leading rushers? Please plenty who can duplicate that.

player already suspended 8 games...I think we can make that up...

Culpepper had multiple chances to start...not good enough.

you also neglect the fact that these 11 players probably poisoned the culture of the team by their continuous breaking of rules.

To all of them I say “bye-bye”.... 

43 minutes ago, Rocky Style said:

Losing to Kansas at Texas is funny. 

Almost as funny as losing to McCheese State...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  22
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

3 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

Solomon could not catch a cold

3rd and 4th leading rushers? Please plenty who can duplicate that.

player already suspended 8 games...I think we can make that up...

Culpepper had multiple chances to start...not good enough.

you also neglect the fact that these 11 players probably poisoned the culture of the team by their continuous breaking of rules.

To all of them I say “bye-bye”.... 

Almost as funny as losing to McCheese State...

please don't complain about lack of depth next year or limit of quality starters seeing as how you think these players are easily replaced.

you're putting your trust in a coach that tried to address the lack of depth at LB by moving a safety and a d-lineman there as starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  582
  • Content Count:  22,678
  • Reputation:   5,814
  • Days Won:  108
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

1 hour ago, Rocky Style said:

Losing to Kansas at Texas is funny. 

Not if you're a Texas fan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Content Count:  7,683
  • Reputation:   1,491
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  08/27/2017

3 hours ago, CousinRicky said:

But isn't liquor banned for kids under 21?  Do we start doing breathalyzers on Sat nights around midnight and then throwing kids off the team?

 

We don't even know why kids were suspended.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.