Jump to content



Bull94 last won the day on December 9 2019

Bull94 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

613 Excellent

About Bull94

  • Rank
    Heisman Candidate

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. because he didn't have a single winning year at the wealthiest program in the country. the only program to have their own espn channel.
  2. I started one back then. Never liked the Strong hire. Wanted Scott all along.
  3. Good article on Austin. https://sports.yahoo.com/the-winless-browns-cut-him-now-hes-a-super-bowl-champ-214949083.html
  4. they were on probation nobody in their right mind would take a job when the school is on probation. Shula was a QB there and they still fired him. he has never had a HC job again. it was career suicide as far as being a HC and Leavitt knew it.
  5. the alabama job was just as a placeholder while they were on probation. Mike shula took it and went 10-2 in his 3rd year and was fired. that place was a mess Moore praised Shula on Monday for providing "stability for our program through four years of NCAA probation" that ends Feb. 1, 2007. https://www.espn.com/college-football/news/story?id=2677110
  6. Fresh start with new coaches he can mold into his way of thinking. not some old timer who is set in his ways. He has been training his entire life to be a head coach and has learned from the best From bowden all the way to Dabo. He doesn't need a mentor. I like it.
  7. clemson has never had a dominant o-line. read up on their offense. like many have said they don't run a lot of plays with 5 and 7 step dropbacks expecting a pocket to form. they get the ball out quick to their athletes. you can't just say pro-style or spread without understanding there are nuances for both.
  8. those videos were hilarious. you could do the same with alabama and all their drops and missed blocks throughout a game. they did all they could to defend the terrible coaching.
  9. clemson has never been known for a dominant o-line. I agree that we need WRs and athletes that we can get into space. The problem: Clemson has never really mastered the “smashmouth” dimension of the smashmouth spread. They’ve always been at their best at spreading the ball around to speedy skill players and winning matchups on the perimeter. They aren’t stocked with the sorts of OL, TE, or FBs to consistently overpower. https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/9/27/17900934/trevor-lawrence-clemson-new-starter-quarterback
  10. interesting article on the clemson offense and how it evolved with the different QBs. Clearly shows they are willing to adapt offense to players skill set.They have never had a dominant o-line either. https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/9/27/17900934/trevor-lawrence-clemson-new-starter-quarterback
  11. the coaches were the sole reason for the dropoff. only listened to 20 minutes and all I heard was about the difference in culture between strong and taggart and the fact that florida athletes( linemen) are smaller and more athletic and are better suited to running the spread. obviously we saw the culture change and saw which coach was more successful in their approach and i agree wholeheartedly with his 2nd claim.
  12. we showed him. we built a powerhouse o-line after he left......
  13. D finished 76th in scoring defense. the only reason anyone thinks they were anything but mediocre is because our offense was so terrible. after year 3, with the focus on defense with a defensive head coach, you need to be somewhere in the top 30 at least. I'll pass. Like our old coach loved to say "we are in need of a good washing" . we need to get the stink of failure off this program.
  14. agreed. it's quite obvious the difference between this guy and strong
  15. sorry. just pointed out your math might be off. didn't mean anything by it. obviously you do it for the love of the game. it's unfortunate that teachers and coaches are underpaid.
  • Create New...