BullsFanInTX Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted October 9, 2022 (edited) It was the wrong play call. GB is a 230 powerful runner. He essentially is Jaren Mangham right now and had success running the ball all night. You put the ball in his hands and tell him to move the pile a yard. If he fails, he fails. Then you tip your cap to Cincy and say good job. Throwing the ball behind the line has a smaller chance of success. Too many things have to go right. Like people actually holding their blocks. It's hard to hold blocks for a long time. The coaching staff outsmarted themselves on the play trying to get cute. Edited October 9, 2022 by BullsFanInTX 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olafberserker Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 3,364 Reputation: 942 Days Won: 5 Joined: 12/20/2007 Share Posted October 9, 2022 3 minutes ago, BullsFanInTX said: It was the wrong play call. GB is a 230 powerful runner. He essentially is Jaren Mangham right now and had success running the ball all night. You put the ball in his hands and tell him to move the pile a yard. If he fails, he fails. Then you tip your cap to Cincy and say good job. Throwing the ball behind the line has a smaller chance of success. Too many things have to go right. Like people actually holding their blocks. It's hard to hold blocks for a long time. The coaching staff outsmarted themselves on the play trying to get cute. I hear you, but the question is was that the call or was it GB's read? On a different note there, if it was GB's read, I'd be a little concerned that he didn't want the ball in that scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michibull Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 957 Reputation: 648 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/29/2012 Share Posted October 9, 2022 Given the shear amount of runs and QB sneaks we ran, why not run a play action slant? The 4th and 1 call can be debated, BUT, my biggest issues were the defense and our passing game in general. These are the achilles heel of this team and are the reasons we can’t win right now. I really think if we had a half way competent defensive coordinator, we could win a few games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFbulls24 Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted October 9, 2022 Amazing isn’t it? Yes, I know it was an RPO, but the amount of times we run the ball up the middle every game and we don’t do it the time we should? The irony. These guys can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot over and over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFbulls24 Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted October 9, 2022 1 hour ago, olafberserker said: I hear you, but the question is was that the call or was it GB's read? On a different note there, if it was GB's read, I'd be a little concerned that he didn't want the ball in that scenario. You need a yard. 1. Uno. We watched Bohanon throw 4 yard passes into the feet of the WR or throw it completely behind a check down. The call should have been a run between the tackles whether it was with Bohanon keeping it and the RB leading the way or handing it off. There should not have even been a pass option. Like said above, if you go with Bohanon on a keeper and they stop it you tip your cap. Instead you over complicate it and give the opportunity for the nonsense to take place that did. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatboykane Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 26 Content Count: 740 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 3 Joined: 03/26/2009 Share Posted October 9, 2022 6 hours ago, USFbulls24 said: You need a yard. 1. Uno. We watched Bohanon throw 4 yard passes into the feet of the WR or throw it completely behind a check down. The call should have been a run between the tackles whether it was with Bohanon keeping it and the RB leading the way or handing it off. There should not have even been a pass option. Like said above, if you go with Bohanon on a keeper and they stop it you tip your cap. Instead you over complicate it and give the opportunity for the nonsense to take place that did. Couldn't have said it better, myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sk00b Posted October 9, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 3,414 Reputation: 1,192 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/09/2010 Share Posted October 9, 2022 8 hours ago, michibull said: competent defensive coordinator, we could win a few games I think the issue lies with our talent/depth. Sure some better calls here and there but we are up to three or four DCs in however many years and that doesn't seem to matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowman1 Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 63 Content Count: 2,358 Reputation: 1,116 Days Won: 8 Joined: 06/24/2007 Author Share Posted October 9, 2022 10 hours ago, CousinRicky said: This is where we missed having Mangham. Not sure if anyone watched LSU today but twice they had straight runs stuffed on 4th down. So no guarantees on these 4th down plays. I didn't love the play call but not going to say the coaches called a bad game because that play didn't work. If Gerry keeps it and gets the first or if Battie turns the corner and gets the first we're all giddy as shiite. There is no doubt that missing Mangham was a factor in this play Also, overall, I felt the play calling yesterday on both sides of the ball was better than we have seen @Ghostbuster put it perfectly - for me, CJS has lost the benefit of the doubt and IMO, that 4th and 1 play is part of an ongoing trend with CJS We can debate all day whether it was an RPO, a player execution issue or player personnel issue - the bottom line is that the situation called for a power play and what was run was finesse. We have a highly paid coaching staff whose job it is to ensure that the right play is called and properly executed at the right time. For me, CJS is no-longer the correct resource to make this happen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhioBull Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 45 Content Count: 473 Reputation: 157 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2004 Share Posted October 9, 2022 4 hours ago, thatboykane said: Couldn't have said it better, myself. Totally agree. I was there and the chances of GB not getting it on a straight up the gut keeper were slim. They had not stopped it all day. Why complicate things. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gatorbull325 Posted October 9, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 119 Content Count: 6,564 Reputation: 2,741 Days Won: 28 Joined: 09/02/2014 Share Posted October 9, 2022 17 hours ago, bowman1 said: I had this game chalked-up as a loss - I was pleasantly surprised by the game plan and was relatively content with the game until that 4th and 1 play The correct call was a Bohanon run - either up the middle or off-tackle. If they had run that play and been stopped, I would have been happy (we were after-all 4 touchdown underdogs) The fact that the coaching staff ran a swing pass, behind the line of scrimmage, to the smallest player on the field shows either: A) They had no faith in Bohanon to get the first down B) They did not know what the correct play call should have been C) They over-thought the play instead of keeping things simple Either way, that play is a trend and the trend says that CJS and his staff are never going to get it right at USF A few weeks ago, I had stated that I would not advocate for firing Coach Scott until the season ended and had a full body of work to look at - the ECU game and the 4th & 1 call today have changed my mind. Scott needs to go - the sooner that happens, the sooner we can start righting the ship and begin the next chapter of USF Football I feel Powell, Hamilton or 224 Ib Jason Albritton could have gotten that yard as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now