Triple B Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,632 Reputation: 10,872 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted September 13, 2014 *sigh* .... Another misleading headline. It should read: USF officials ready to act for a feasibility study on an on-campus stadium You gotta start somewhere...OCS's don't just magically appear. Absolutely agree .... but that headline can be taken that usf officials are ready to move forward with building one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted September 13, 2014 *sigh* .... Another misleading headline. Once again, I'm shocked! Shocked, that an OCS topic headline would be misleading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sellular1 Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 196 Content Count: 6,615 Reputation: 1,782 Days Won: 51 Joined: 07/04/2008 Share Posted September 13, 2014 (edited) *sigh* .... Another misleading headline. It should read:USF officials ready to act for a feasibility study on an on-campus stadium You can fight this OCS debate all you want but in the end, USF needs an OCS. We may be the only school that does not have an OCS in AAC soon as Temple is getting close to announcing an OCS ground breaking. Time for USF to rhing really big and get this program back off the mat. If I thought USF needed an OCS, I wouldn't be saying a word. I do think they need an IPF .... and couldn't find anything about an imminent ground breaking announcement from Temple. Did see where they bought an old high school that could be used as a site for one ... do you have any more updated info on a Temple OCS? If money wasn't an issue, do you think USF would benefit from an OCS? If a T Boone Pickens type alum threw $250 mill at the stadium would you change your tone? Nope. Wouldn't change my tone a bit. I've never said I didn't want an OCS, just that we don't need one to accomplish anything we want to accomplish as a football program. If money wasn't an issue, where you could build an ocs with the affordable amenities of RayJay, I'm down with it. Appreciate your opinion. I thought your apprehension was solely monetary. What if the Big12 said an OCS was a requirement for admission, would that change your mind or would you rather stay in the AAC? Edited September 13, 2014 by Sellular1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,632 Reputation: 10,872 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted September 13, 2014 *sigh* .... Another misleading headline. It should read:USF officials ready to act for a feasibility study on an on-campus stadium You can fight this OCS debate all you want but in the end, USF needs an OCS. We may be the only school that does not have an OCS in AAC soon as Temple is getting close to announcing an OCS ground breaking. Time for USF to rhing really big and get this program back off the mat. If I thought USF needed an OCS, I wouldn't be saying a word. I do think they need an IPF .... and couldn't find anything about an imminent ground breaking announcement from Temple. Did see where they bought an old high school that could be used as a site for one ... do you have any more updated info on a Temple OCS? If money wasn't an issue, do you think USF would benefit from an OCS? If a T Boone Pickens type alum threw $250 mill at the stadium would you change your tone? Nope. Wouldn't change my tone a bit. I've never said I didn't want an OCS, just that we don't need one to accomplish anything we want to accomplish as a football program. If money wasn't an issue, where you could build an ocs with the affordable amenities of RayJay, I'm down with it. Appreciate your opinion. I thought your apprehension was solely monetary. What if the Big12 said an OCS was a requirement for admission, would that change your mind or would you rather stay in the AAC? My answer is, I think, as a football program, getting to a P5 is something we want to accomplish ... Any more of your pipe dream questions will have to wait until a later time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,043 Reputation: 10,833 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted September 13, 2014 *sigh* .... Another misleading headline. Once again, I'm shocked! Shocked, that an OCS topic headline would be misleading. Newspaper headline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls1181 Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 170 Content Count: 5,722 Reputation: 366 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/03/2011 Share Posted September 13, 2014 There it is.... I am surprised at the timing but I am glad that officials are at least looking into it at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsbucsfan426 Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 129 Content Count: 3,116 Reputation: 473 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/28/2010 Share Posted September 13, 2014 *sigh* .... Another misleading headline. It should read:USF officials ready to act for a feasibility study on an on-campus stadium You can fight this OCS debate all you want but in the end, USF needs an OCS. We may be the only school that does not have an OCS in AAC soon as Temple is getting close to announcing an OCS ground breaking. Time for USF to rhing really big and get this program back off the mat. If I thought USF needed an OCS, I wouldn't be saying a word. I do think they need an IPF .... and couldn't find anything about an imminent ground breaking announcement from Temple. Did see where they bought an old high school that could be used as a site for one ... do you have any more updated info on a Temple OCS? If money wasn't an issue, do you think USF would benefit from an OCS? If a T Boone Pickens type alum threw $250 mill at the stadium would you change your tone? Nope. Wouldn't change my tone a bit. I've never said I didn't want an OCS, just that we don't need one to accomplish anything we want to accomplish as a football program. If money wasn't an issue, where you could build an ocs with the affordable amenities of RayJay, I'm down with it. Appreciate your opinion. I thought your apprehension was solely monetary. What if the Big12 said an OCS was a requirement for admission, would that change your mind or would you rather stay in the AAC? If that's all it takes, we would have done it in a heart beat. But you need some surge of momentum to capitalize off of. Let's say we have an eight or nine win season, and then in February after Taggart nails the recruiting class, then you can complete the motion to jive people up through off season "Hey! We're building an OCS!" But even so, you would have to line up the donors first, no matter what type of stadium we build. It will be looked at, certainly. But I think a lot of this feasibility study will come down to "can we raise enough money to pay for the stadium we want?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted September 13, 2014 moving from a state of the art stadium to a rinky dink 40k jerry rigged stadium would be dumb but very usf like if you cant build a state of the art stadium to rival the swamp or doak why bother 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemcp88 Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 14 Content Count: 2,653 Reputation: 41 Days Won: 2 Joined: 07/24/2008 Share Posted September 13, 2014 They need to convince the local corporations to get involved. TECO and Publix to contribute. Hooters and Outback as well. Not sure how well Hooters is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsbucsfan426 Posted September 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 129 Content Count: 3,116 Reputation: 473 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/28/2010 Share Posted September 13, 2014 moving from a state of the art stadium to a rinky dink 40k jerry rigged stadium would be dumb but very usf like if you cant build a state of the art stadium to rival the swamp or doak why bother Your assumption that we would build a rinky dink stadium is silly. USF has said repeatedly that they're going to do it right and right is what the University of Minnesota has. Btw, the Swamp and Doak were originally just that-rinky dink stadiums. The Swamp started as a 22k seat stadium in 1921 and didn't get to a size that befits the Gator's history of winning until 40 years after it was built (it finally cleared 62000 in 1961). Doak Campbell started as a 15k seat stadium in 1950 and didn't clear the 60k mark until 35 years later, when it hit 60519. Stadiums ARE NOT built over night, they grow with demand for the program. And if population growth and Florida talent is any indication, USF will grow it's fan base without real trouble. All we have to do is win. While I can't deny I would love a smaller scale replica of Century Link Field in Seattle (that place just gets loud from the design alone), I get that it's not feasible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now