MMW Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 2,127 Reputation: 924 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted August 22, 2013 It's not a final decision once he names a starter, of course, but Taggart has consistently said he doesn't like any system of rotating QBs during a game. Given that, not sure how you guys are on page 4 of a thread titled "QB by committee." Plenty of meat on that bone. Later we'll make soup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrush33 Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,808 Reputation: 793 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Share Posted August 22, 2013 No Floyd. I would rather have no big plays no mistakes from Eveld and run the Ball and play good defense. Floyd will just put the defense in bad situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted August 22, 2013 No Floyd. I would rather have no big plays no mistakes from Eveld and run the Ball and play good defense. Floyd will just put the defense in bad situations. You don't know that, football players evolve, especially at this stage of development. If he was a 10 year vet in the NFL, you aren't changing his play style but at this point of his career you can't determine his current game play based on things that happened last year, only on what you actually see him doing right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deters- Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 67 Content Count: 3,749 Reputation: 309 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/22/2008 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I disagree. With two sophomores and a redshirt freshman already in the mix, unless he's better than all three of them, you redshirt him to help spread out your QBs. Give him another year to learn the playbook without the pressure of games. Next year is when he get's his playing time. Huh? Eveld is a Senior, Floyd is a RSoph and Bench is a Soph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deters- Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 67 Content Count: 3,749 Reputation: 309 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/22/2008 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Apparently Bench did pretty good in the scrimmage the other night. I think that bodes well for him. He will only grasp the offense better as the year goes on. Might as well put him in now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I disagree. With two sophomores and a redshirt freshman already in the mix, unless he's better than all three of them, you redshirt him to help spread out your QBs. Give him another year to learn the playbook without the pressure of games. Next year is when he get's his playing time. Huh? Eveld is a Senior, Floyd is a RSoph and Bench is a Soph. Already admitted my mistake above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabull80 Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 96 Content Count: 4,501 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/25/2001 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think it is going to be Floyd. Most talented QB but inconsistent and coaches will beat him until he gets it thru his head not make TOs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabull80 Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 96 Content Count: 4,501 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/25/2001 Share Posted August 22, 2013 On a side note: I think it is great that a true freshman is even in the mix. It give me hope for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The "committee" part may come in a game-to-game fashion. I don't think CWT will rotate in-game unless he has to. But until we get a solid player at the position, and as long as these guys are all close to the same level, I think it will remain up for grabs in the season. Got to get the chemistry right before settling on who takes over the team for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedyBull Posted August 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 44 Content Count: 1,705 Reputation: 221 Days Won: 3 Joined: 01/25/2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Think CWT would purposefully hold bench/white to start against MSU just so they don't have anything to study or would that be more detrimental to us not having any game time under their belts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now