QB Competition

[CousinRicky]

3 minutes ago, Bull Dozer said:

There's only one thing that can help a crushed soul, Bourbon 

Funny you mention that.  Don't think you are in the Bourbon Club on here but Sept is Bourbon Month and someone put out a 30 bourbon in 30 day challenge.  Just coming back to the 'puter with an ounce of Van Winkle 12.  

[CousinRicky]

5 minutes ago, puc86 said:

Its not like they compare DNA samples all one must do is adversely acquire someone else's identity and boom four more years. 

So you're saying we can put the suspended linebacker in Nico's jersey for the 1st half?  

[puc86]

Just now, CousinRicky said:

So you're saying we can put the suspended linebacker in Nico's jersey for the 1st half?  

For sure 

[fla331boy]

29 minutes ago, JTrue said:

I know this is a joke, but technically, you have 5 years (or you get a waiver for a 6th) to play your 4. I never played my senior year, but I can't go back now and play.

Why can't you?

New school and walk-on?

[fla331boy]

27 minutes ago, JTrue said:

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

http://www.ncaa.org/student-athletes/current/transfer-terms

Division I five-year clock: If you play at a Division I school, you have five-calendar years in which to play four seasons of competition. Your five-year clock starts when you enroll as a full-time student at any college. Thereafter, your clock continues, even if you spend an academic year in residence as a result of transferring; decide to red shirt, if you do not attend school or even if you go part-time during your college career.

dang it!

[CousinRicky]

Easy way around those rules.

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

32 minutes ago, JTrue said:

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

http://www.ncaa.org/student-athletes/current/transfer-terms

Division I five-year clock: If you play at a Division I school, you have five-calendar years in which to play four seasons of competition. Your five-year clock starts when you enroll as a full-time student at any college. Thereafter, your clock continues, even if you spend an academic year in residence as a result of transferring; decide to red shirt, if you do not attend school or even if you go part-time during your college career.

I love seeing dreams crushed.

Excellent work!

[JTrue]

16 minutes ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said:

I love seeing dreams crushed.

Excellent work!

God **** Necessary Roughness ruined a generation of people's knowledge on NCAA eligibility.

[Bull Dozer]

55 minutes ago, CousinRicky said:

Funny you mention that.  Don't think you are in the Bourbon Club on here but Sept is Bourbon Month and someone put out a 30 bourbon in 30 day challenge.  Just coming back to the 'puter with an ounce of Van Winkle 12.  

Looks like some Eagle Rare may be in order 

[I like GOOOOLD (and green)]

On 9/11/2019 at 12:00 PM, Bull94 said:

this isn't a rebuilding year. we were built to win this year. that's why we have all these transfers and returning starters.

we rank 11th in the country for returning production on offense

https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2019/1/31/18204093/2019-ncaa-football-returning-starters-experience

 

Having all the upperclassmen and transfers are nice for a winning build.  But it either clicks or it doesn't, and can we argue that we're clicking? The AAC is competitive enough to where I don't think that a team can go o'fer in OOC play then expect to be in the running for a conference championship (sorry PUC).  FCS games don't count in the metric either way.  In this case, wouldn't it be better to consolidate the rebuild (you said yourself that the next couple years look young) and prepare them for a better start next season? Again I'm not sure the difference between being bad bowl eligible (maybe?) with Barnett et al at the helm and having a straight up rebuilding year are that far apart, with the benefit obviously being a more experienced group next season and beyond.