Paisa el Toro Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted March 27, 2014 The only one I've heard be negative about USF is Booger on 98.7 yesterday. He doesn't think a degree is needed to coach (and no one really is/was arguing that), but he apparently thinks USF shouldn't require it, and doesn't understand why a school would (and completely dismisses the argument about "coach should have a degree to tell his kids they need to get one"). He thinks coaches have little to do with academics. He fails to understand the most basic things. I stopped listening to that station a long time ago. State statute requires a degree to coach in the college ranks. If he's got an issue, he should take it up with the state legislature, not the schools abiding by the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallyBull Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,685 Reputation: 1,186 Days Won: 14 Joined: 01/19/2011 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Then Booger is an idiot. Coaches have HUGE influence on the academic performance of their players. Agree 100%. Booger and Ron are virtually unlistenable. Their show is less of a sports show and more of a (pseudo) entertainment show with sports occasionally sprinkled in just so they can call it a sports show. I don't like DUImig either but at least he honestly tries to address sports issues (don't care for the fantasy football or gambling stuff but I recognize that others might). Bottom line is that 98.7 has proven to be a big disappointment in the afternoons, although I do like the Commish in the mornings... Anyway, the university requires a degree (plus experience) for the position. Whether you can actually coach without one is irrelevant in this context. I for one am glad the university maintained its integrity on this issue; I would've been disappointed if it hadn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danm1983 Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 44 Content Count: 2,994 Reputation: 151 Days Won: 4 Joined: 08/20/2009 Share Posted March 27, 2014 The only one I've heard be negative about USF is Booger on 98.7 yesterday. He doesn't think a degree is needed to coach (and no one really is/was arguing that), but he apparently thinks USF shouldn't require it, and doesn't understand why a school would (and completely dismisses the argument about "coach should have a degree to tell his kids they need to get one"). He thinks coaches have little to do with academics. He fails to understand the most basic things. I stopped listening to that station a long time ago. State statute requires a degree to coach in the college ranks. If he's got an issue, he should take it up with the state legislature, not the schools abiding by the law. Thanks, didn't know it was state wide (but I like that). I agree that in theory a degree isn't needed to coach well. Hell, I'm sure there are some guys who can coach their socks off and barely graduated high school...but to hold the JOB of coach is where it's required and I like that FL has it set that way. I like listening to Kirk most of the time, and Justin/Jim, and Rich sometimes. Dinger and Booger seem to always side on the side I disagree with, but they're both former pros so I guess they have similar mindsets and don't see the everyman view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,610 Content Count: 74,511 Reputation: 10,799 Days Won: 422 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Normally I would say that any publicity is good publicity, but I really don't like this story. If you look at all the facts, USF didn't do anything wrong, and I think most people understand that, but it just sucks that we can't be in the news for something else (like winning games). Even on a local level, no one has been talking about USF for a long time, and now it seems like we get wall-to-wall coverage on 98.7 the fan with the phony "pro-con" stances that the hosts take so they can create a fake "debate" about whether or not USF was wrong. I noticed today in the Tampa Bay Times on the front page of the sports section, we were the lead story with (as far as I can remember) a bigger headline font than I have ever seen for USF about the "debacle at USF." We never got that kind of bold-face font headline for winning something even when we were winning games. Oh well. I guess when they smell blood in the water, they like to swarm. The teaser on the front page of the newspaper has "Search For USF Basketball Coach Botched" directing to a column by Jones ... who calls this the "most embarrassing moment in the history of USF Athletics"(Apparently Tommy was in an alcohol induced coma last August 31st). Fennelly also felt compelled to write a column about it today but, surprisingly, mainly focused on the botching from the SM angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 96,987 Reputation: 10,808 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted March 27, 2014 National coverage has mostly been neutral or better for USF negative for Masiello. Local coverage has been negative USF - Joey Knight and Tom Jones out with black eyes and embarrassment for USF. Not sure how they saw it differently other than it creates a stir, or it's just the defacto process. Johnston I think was neutral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted March 27, 2014 The teaser on the front page of the newspaper has "Search For USF Basketball Coach Botched" directing to a column by Jones ... who calls this the "most embarrassing moment in the history of USF Athletics"(Apparently Tommy was in an alcohol induced coma last August 31st). Fennelly also felt compelled to write a column about it today but, surprisingly, mainly focused on the botching from the SM angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Most embarrassing moment in history of USF athletics? I nominate the extension for Skip after 5-7. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,610 Content Count: 74,511 Reputation: 10,799 Days Won: 422 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted March 27, 2014 National coverage has mostly been neutral or better for USF negative for Masiello. Local coverage has been negative USF - Joey Knight and Tom Jones out with black eyes and embarrassment for USF. Not sure how they saw it differently other than it creates a stir, or it's just the defacto process. Johnston I think was neutral. Pretty much agree. The Times headline writers are definitely in a ***** mode. JK digging up Keever and going with it was definitely a BM type move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,895 Content Count: 66,073 Reputation: 2,431 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted March 27, 2014 dont see how baD FOR USF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizman Posted March 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,330 Content Count: 21,282 Reputation: 907 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Share Posted March 27, 2014 dont see how baD FOR USF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now