Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Content Count:  883
  • Reputation:   481
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/24/2021

12 minutes ago, Jim Johnson said:

This is evident just looking at basketball... the fourth- and fifth- year players on a team like Oakland manhandled the more talented, but significantly younger, players at Kentucky.  Sure, the talent difference was remarkable... but when the game gets more phyiscal, that difference can be mitigated.

A lot of people like to compare the top college teams with bottom NFL teams... "Alabama could beat ..." this year it's U Conn could beat some NBA teams.  No.  No they could not... 18-22 year olds could not beat teams that are just as talented but 8 to 10 years older, stronger, and more experienced.

Consider how many rookies go from college to starting their first game and succeed.  For every CJ Stroud there's plenty of Ryan Leafs... and there is even more disparity for the late rounders.

An 0-16 NFL team would beat the college national champion from the same season like 60-10 lol. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  2,468
  • Reputation:   1,139
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  04/08/2012

22 minutes ago, Jim Johnson said:

This is evident just looking at basketball... the fourth- and fifth- year players on a team like Oakland manhandled the more talented, but significantly younger, players at Kentucky.  Sure, the talent difference was remarkable... but when the game gets more phyiscal, that difference can be mitigated.

A lot of people like to compare the top college teams with bottom NFL teams... "Alabama could beat ..." this year it's U Conn could beat some NBA teams.  No.  No they could not... 18-22 year olds could not beat teams that are just as talented but 8 to 10 years older, stronger, and more experienced.

Consider how many rookies go from college to starting their first game and succeed.  For every CJ Stroud there's plenty of Ryan Leafs... and there is even more disparity for the late rounders.

Even the best college teams only send a small portion of their roster to the pros, where the pro team is full of guys who were stars in college. The backups on the pros were stars in college. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  2,127
  • Reputation:   924
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

3 hours ago, Jim Johnson said:

This is evident just looking at basketball... the fourth- and fifth- year players on a team like Oakland manhandled the more talented, but significantly younger, players at Kentucky.  Sure, the talent difference was remarkable... but when the game gets more phyiscal, that difference can be mitigated.

A lot of people like to compare the top college teams with bottom NFL teams... "Alabama could beat ..." this year it's U Conn could beat some NBA teams.  No.  No they could not... 18-22 year olds could not beat teams that are just as talented but 8 to 10 years older, stronger, and more experienced.

Consider how many rookies go from college to starting their first game and succeed.  For every CJ Stroud there's plenty of Ryan Leafs... and there is even more disparity for the late rounders.

It would still be fun to watch

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  2,045
  • Reputation:   1,032
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  12/02/2022

2 minutes ago, MMW said:

It would still be fun to watch

 It would be like watching a UFC fight between Shaquille o Neale and Danny De Vitto. It would be one-sided, but it would be entertaining.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,688
  • Reputation:   1,237
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

This thread is far off the rails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,137
  • Reputation:   4,642
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

10 minutes ago, Gismo said:

This thread is far off the rails.

Yeah we need some anon from WVU to chime in about realignment.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  79
  • Content Count:  3,001
  • Reputation:   821
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  07/28/2023

On 4/7/2024 at 1:00 PM, Cat941 said:

LOL!  

Here is an article about NU:  https://omaha.com/news/state-regional/education/cutting-programs-merging-campuses-nebraska-university-leaders-ponder-bold-changes-to-compete/article_35dabe3a-f435-11ee-bb4b-5360b0e1ccb1.html

Here's something interesting from the article:  The University of South Florida in 2020 consolidated its three separate campuses into a much larger, singularly accredited university. Three years later, USF was invited to join the AAU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Content Count:  137
  • Reputation:   67
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/09/2024

13 hours ago, Jim Johnson said:

This is evident just looking at basketball... the fourth- and fifth- year players on a team like Oakland manhandled the more talented, but significantly younger, players at Kentucky.  Sure, the talent difference was remarkable... but when the game gets more phyiscal, that difference can be mitigated.

A lot of people like to compare the top college teams with bottom NFL teams... "Alabama could beat ..." this year it's U Conn could beat some NBA teams.  No.  No they could not... 18-22 year olds could not beat teams that are just as talented but 8 to 10 years older, stronger, and more experienced.

Consider how many rookies go from college to starting their first game and succeed.  For every CJ Stroud there's plenty of Ryan Leafs... and there is even more disparity for the late rounders.

Very well articulated.  I couldn't agree more.  The best teams competing for championships have experienced talent and that seems to be even more prevalent with the transfer portal.  While our talent may get raided, I am hopeful our sports teams can use the portal in a beneficial way.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  48
  • Content Count:  2,347
  • Reputation:   661
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2009

14 hours ago, Jim Johnson said:

This is evident just looking at basketball... the fourth- and fifth- year players on a team like Oakland manhandled the more talented, but significantly younger, players at Kentucky.  Sure, the talent difference was remarkable... but when the game gets more phyiscal, that difference can be mitigated.

A lot of people like to compare the top college teams with bottom NFL teams... "Alabama could beat ..." this year it's U Conn could beat some NBA teams.  No.  No they could not... 18-22 year olds could not beat teams that are just as talented but 8 to 10 years older, stronger, and more experienced.

Consider how many rookies go from college to starting their first game and succeed.  For every CJ Stroud there's plenty of Ryan Leafs... and there is even more disparity for the late rounders.

All the more reason to extend eligibility in the NCAA. They could cut into profits of both the NFL and NBA.

Edited by USFBULL_08
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.