chapelbull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted December 2, 2018 1 hour ago, michibull said: The core was very much intact. For the exception of Dunn, Green, 2 OL and 1 DL, it was essentially the same team....... oh, but it is son. Dungy built the team, Look it up, there were numerous new starters and if you want to talk about "building" the team. Dungy inherited Sapp and Brooks, the heart and soul of that defense, from Sam Wyche. It's an ignorant statement and even more ignorant to try and support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapelbull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted December 2, 2018 1 hour ago, michibull said: (yes, Manning had a large part to play). You think? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,269 Reputation: 6,152 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted December 2, 2018 I’m just glad we are building are athletics philosophy off some 90’s middle school teacher’s poster of a cat dangling from a tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michibull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 957 Reputation: 648 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/29/2012 Share Posted December 2, 2018 10 hours ago, chapelbull said: Look it up, there were numerous new starters and if you want to talk about "building" the team. Dungy inherited Sapp and Brooks, the heart and soul of that defense, from Sam Wyche. It's an ignorant statement and even more ignorant to try and support it. I did look it up, that's how I pointed out Dunn, Green, 2 OL and a DL. Brooks and Sapp are what you get when you go 5-11. You want support, every single coach that comes in and year one, there are changes, but we always say the the team is inherited by the previous coach. Dungy was here for 5 years, it was his team and the team he built; he took what Wyche built and Gruden got what Dungy built. Strong got what Taggart built, Taggart got what Holtz built and Holtz got what Leavitt built. If you can't see the logic and reasoning in this, you my friend are incapable of seeing another persons point of view and that is someone that cannot have a rational conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michibull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 957 Reputation: 648 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/29/2012 Share Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) 12 hours ago, OcalaBull2 said: How many Super Bowls did he win with the Bucs? What is your point for this statement? I'm not saying your wrong or anything like that, just confused. Are you saying because he didn't win here that we don't know if his system would have been successful or that he couldn't have won without Peyton Manning? Either way I don't think it's conclusive. Belichek was a failure in Cleveland, but when he got Brady look what happened; is it Brady or Belichek, that's a discussion that will go on forever. What we do know is Tampa was one of the worst organizations in football and when Dungy got here, it really turned around. In Indianapolis, the Colts under Mora/Manning were 32-32, I think history speaks for itself when it comes to Dungy/Manning and their success. Edited December 2, 2018 by michibull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michibull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 957 Reputation: 648 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/29/2012 Share Posted December 2, 2018 11 hours ago, chapelbull said: You think? Manning with Jim Mora as the coach was 32-32, Manning with Dungy is slightly better. So let's not go saying Dungy had no effect on Manning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapelbull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted December 2, 2018 1 hour ago, michibull said: I did look it up, that's how I pointed out Dunn, Green, 2 OL and a DL. Brooks and Sapp are what you get when you go 5-11. You want support, every single coach that comes in and year one, there are changes, but we always say the the team is inherited by the previous coach. Dungy was here for 5 years, it was his team and the team he built; he took what Wyche built and Gruden got what Dungy built. Strong got what Taggart built, Taggart got what Holtz built and Holtz got what Leavitt built. If you can't see the logic and reasoning in this, you my friend are incapable of seeing another persons point of view and that is someone that cannot have a rational conversation. 9 new starters. There were 9 new starters. Almost half the team. 9. Gruden was the coach. Gruden got the team over the hump. Both sides of the ball were more aggressive under Gruden. Gruden's team won the Super Bowl not Dungy's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapelbull Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted December 2, 2018 52 minutes ago, michibull said: Manning with Jim Mora as the coach was 32-32, Manning with Dungy is slightly better. So let's not go saying Dungy had no effect on Manning. Mora's team . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outlaw Posted December 2, 2018 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,557 Reputation: 3,270 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted December 2, 2018 So is STRONGS team better than Willie's team? Are either of them better than Leavitt's program? No we regressed and we need to get over the hump. Who takes us back? Where is the fire and intensity now? I hate UCF but watching them comeback against MEMPHIS and play with intensity and passion shows that we lack it. We need the SWAGGER, aggressiveness, intensity, passion, fire in our bellies, or whatever you want to call it back. We are too laid back and just lackadaisical on the field now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fold FB Invest in BB Posted December 2, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 76 Content Count: 6,712 Reputation: 1,131 Days Won: 17 Joined: 09/07/2009 Share Posted December 2, 2018 24 minutes ago, TheGreatOutlaw said: So is STRONGS team better than Willie's team? Are either of them better than Leavitt's program? No we regressed and we need to get over the hump. Who takes us back? Where is the fire and intensity now? I hate UCF but watching them comeback against MEMPHIS and play with intensity and passion shows that we lack it. We need the SWAGGER, aggressiveness, intensity, passion, fire in our bellies, or whatever you want to call it back. We are too laid back and just lackadaisical on the field now. Maybe, but what we really need are a few true linebackers and about 3 to 4 more seconds for Blake in the pocket. We win 10 games easy with those 2 things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now