Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Non-sports: USF Call to All


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  338
  • Content Count:  3,691
  • Reputation:   247
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  09/08/2004

35 minutes ago, bullstampede9922 said:

I got a reply back from Spano basically saying the suggested 50% criteria was never passed and didn't become a law so better luck next time.  So much for local representation.  I guess I know who I'm not voting for next election.

Spano went to USF

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

39 minutes ago, bullstampede9922 said:

I got a reply back from Spano basically saying the suggested 50% criteria was never passed and didn't become a law so better luck next time.  So much for local representation.  I guess I know who I'm not voting for next election.

Of course it was never passed.  That isn't the point.  The point is that it was change by two men at the 11th hour so that it could be slipped in without anyone noticing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Content Count:  1,489
  • Reputation:   543
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/24/2013

53 minutes ago, KB said:

Spano went to USF

It says in his bio that he's an FSU grad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,032
  • Content Count:  7,505
  • Reputation:   1,106
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  12/25/2001

2 hours ago, bullstampede9922 said:

It says in his bio that he's an FSU grad.

I think he's a USF undergrad and FSU Law. 

I think I got the same boilerplate response from him (below).  At least he actually responded.  My rep, James Grant, never responds to any of my correspondence.  I'm not voting for him for that reason, alone.

 

It’s good to hear from you. Thank you for reaching out.  The current requirement for pre-imminent status (passed in 2016) is a 6-year graduation rate of 70%. USF is currently at about 66%.   Based on the current criteria, USF would have likely qualified for pre-imminent status within the next few to several years.  To be clear, however, they would not have qualified this year.

 

Earlier this Session, a new criteria was suggested, a 4-year 50% graduation rate.  USF’s current 4 year graduation rate is just over 50%, so the expectation and hope was that USF would achieve pre-imminent status this year.  This proposed new criteria, however, was never passed and did not become law.  In the final stages of the budget conference process, the Senate increased the percentage of the proposed new  criteria to a 60% 4-year graduation rate.  By comparison, the 4-year graduation rates for FSU (61%) and UF (65%) do meet the new criteria.         

 

I expect that USF will meet this criteria in the very near future.  Thank you again for contacting me.

 

Ross Spano

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  3,222
  • Reputation:   387
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  07/30/2011

Will USF need to take less people of lower socio economic status to meet this updated 4yr graduation rate?  Is that what the legislature wants?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

7 hours ago, Apis Bull said:

Of course it was never passed.  That isn't the point.  The point is that it was change by two men at the 11th hour so that it could be slipped in without anyone noticing. 

Wait a minute, are you telling me we have elected officials voting on things they've never actually read?!? Preposterous!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,332
  • Content Count:  97,012
  • Reputation:   10,814
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

Brian Lamb's letter: 

http://bit.ly/2pwXiDL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

13 minutes ago, Brad said:

Brian Lamb's letter: 

http://bit.ly/2pwXiDL

 

Nice letter.

Diplomatic, but firm.

And insistent that we WILL achieve preeminence status

That said, we are ALREADY preeminent in baseball!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,332
  • Content Count:  97,012
  • Reputation:   10,814
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Content Count:  2,610
  • Reputation:   635
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  12/17/2015

9 minutes ago, Brad said:

 

I loved this so much. Harlan is very active on the twits and clearly holds no punches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.