smazza Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrush33 Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,803 Reputation: 792 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? The better question is the over/under on when you will hit 100,000 post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogma Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 303 Content Count: 5,550 Reputation: 866 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/07/2009 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? The better question is the over/under on when you will hit 100,000 post. Over/under on how many of those posts will actually contain any substance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? The better question is the over/under on when you will hit 100,000 post. Over/under on how many of those posts will actually contain any substance. Easy. Under 10.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? The better question is the over/under on when you will hit 100,000 post. What happens first, smazza's 100,000th post or CWT's 25th win as a head coach? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? The better question is the over/under on when you will hit 100,000 post. What happens first, smazza's 100,000th post or CWT's 25th win as a head coach? I'll take Steves posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull94 Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 22 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Slick, how has that Elite 11 MVP fared so far in his college career? How soon did Aaron Rogers start when signed in the draft? start? I don't think Woulard is in their 3 deep. Rodgers was backing up a future hall of famer Or, he's the freshman backup to a possible first rounder. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2170282-ucla-football-depth-chart-analysis-complete-2014-preview-and-predictions (information courtesy of the Bruin Sports Report, Los Angeles Times and Orange County Register) If AW was the back up, why did Neuheisel get game experience and not him? Was he hurt? No idea. All I know is that he's a redshirt freshman behind one of the best QBs in the country and people are saying proof of him sucking is that he's not starting. I typed in UCLA depth chart and this is what I got. they don't have an official depth chart. not even from bleacher report. many sites have it reversed including rivals who has a walk-on who got snaps last year listed as their #3 and Neuheisel as #2. I would say considering Neuheisel got snaps this year that Woulard is no better than 3rd. Oh and they signed the #1 prep QB in the country this year as an early enrolee. https://ucla.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 148 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Share Posted December 16, 2014 it is all speculation until they hit the field all conjecture our defense didn't seem that bad! why would coach allen take this job? is he a head coach in waiting? The better question is the over/under on when you will hit 100,000 post. What happens first, smazza's 100,000th post or CWT's 25th win as a head coach? Considering Taggart is at 22 wins as a head coach, I'll go ahead and take Taggart on this one. Even if he's fired next year and never picks up a head job again, I think he'll get at least 3 wins he needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Slick, how has that Elite 11 MVP fared so far in his college career? How soon did Aaron Rogers start when signed in the draft? start? I don't think Woulard is in their 3 deep. Rodgers was backing up a future hall of famer Or, he's the freshman backup to a possible first rounder. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2170282-ucla-football-depth-chart-analysis-complete-2014-preview-and-predictions (information courtesy of the Bruin Sports Report, Los Angeles Times and Orange County Register) If AW was the back up, why did Neuheisel get game experience and not him? Was he hurt? No idea. All I know is that he's a redshirt freshman behind one of the best QBs in the country and people are saying proof of him sucking is that he's not starting. I typed in UCLA depth chart and this is what I got. they don't have an official depth chart. not even from bleacher report. many sites have it reversed including rivals who has a walk-on who got snaps last year listed as their #3 and Neuheisel as #2. I would say considering Neuheisel got snaps this year that Woulard is no better than 3rd. Oh and they signed the #1 prep QB in the country this year as an early enrolee. https://ucla.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp http://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla_bruin_football/2014/3/20/5524930/getting-ready-for-spring-and-beyond-uclas-2014-and-2015-depth-and This is what the UCLA VooDooFive says on the matter. Don't care one way or the other, but they seem to think Neuheisel getting snaps this year has zero bearing on next year and project AW as the starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull94 Posted December 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 22 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Slick, how has that Elite 11 MVP fared so far in his college career? How soon did Aaron Rogers start when signed in the draft? start? I don't think Woulard is in their 3 deep. Rodgers was backing up a future hall of famer Or, he's the freshman backup to a possible first rounder. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2170282-ucla-football-depth-chart-analysis-complete-2014-preview-and-predictions (information courtesy of the Bruin Sports Report, Los Angeles Times and Orange County Register) If AW was the back up, why did Neuheisel get game experience and not him? Was he hurt? No idea. All I know is that he's a redshirt freshman behind one of the best QBs in the country and people are saying proof of him sucking is that he's not starting. I typed in UCLA depth chart and this is what I got. they don't have an official depth chart. not even from bleacher report. many sites have it reversed including rivals who has a walk-on who got snaps last year listed as their #3 and Neuheisel as #2. I would say considering Neuheisel got snaps this year that Woulard is no better than 3rd. Oh and they signed the #1 prep QB in the country this year as an early enrolee. https://ucla.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp http://www.bruinsnation.com/ucla_bruin_football/2014/3/20/5524930/getting-ready-for-spring-and-beyond-uclas-2014-and-2015-depth-and This is what the UCLA VooDooFive says on the matter. Don't care one way or the other, but they seem to think Neuheisel getting snaps this year has zero bearing on next year and project AW as the starter. that was written March 2014. Here is an article one month later in the LA Daily News that talks of Woulard's struggles that spring. Seems to me he might not be all they thought. If they had plans to use him next year, the #1 prospect in the country likely doesn't sign and he would have played in front of Neuheisel. Neuheisel had 30 pass attempts in a 20-17 game against Texas when the starter got hurt. that right there tells you who their backup was this year. http://www.dailynews.com/sports/20140421/quarterback-asiantii-woulard-hitting-wall-in-uclas-backup-race http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=400547848 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now