South_Florida_Flip Posted September 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 99 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted September 29, 2014 that stat sucks maybe his beef wasn't with Jim afterall .. maybe its the fans? He started the "beef" back in 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls2k Posted September 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 980 Reputation: 91 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/07/2012 Share Posted September 29, 2014 (edited) He has a face for radio and a personality for Twitter. Edited September 29, 2014 by Bulls2k 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted September 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted September 29, 2014 The truth hurts. It's up to this fan base to make USF games the "it" thing to do again. And I don't see that happening, until we start winning some games consistently. And I still think McMurphy has a mole in USF athletics. If memory serves, he was the one to break the Masiello hiring, before Masiello's background check came back to the athletic department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted September 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted September 29, 2014 If not him, it'd be someone else that's got a jock itch for meaning in numbers. He's just usually the first to open his yap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South_Florida_Flip Posted September 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 99 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted September 29, 2014 And I still think McMurphy has a mole in USF athletics. I think we're all in agreement on that. I wonder it is and why they would keep feeding him information with a new administration in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullFan98 Posted October 1, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 258 Content Count: 7,780 Reputation: 328 Days Won: 7 Joined: 08/13/2010 Share Posted October 1, 2014 **** him Amen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatDaddyBull Posted October 1, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 34 Content Count: 2,166 Reputation: 225 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/09/2012 Share Posted October 1, 2014 And I still think McMurphy has a mole in USF athletics. I think we're all in agreement on that. I wonder it is and why they would keep feeding him information with a new administration in place. For as much turnover as there seems to have been I'm curious how we don't know who that mole is by now. Someone else mentioned, he prefers to be first. Accuracy is not as important to him. So he and three other writers might hear the same thing but he's the only one who rushes to put it out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Odom Posted October 1, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 39 Reputation: 21 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/10/2013 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I don't see why USF still gives him info before anyone else. What an ass: And why he still is interested in ragging on USF? Only supports that he still has a problem even after his relationships with Erskin, Grothe and Miller paved his way to ESPN. What a tool My apologies if that RT came off as brash ... I thought it was an interesting (albeit nonsensical) statistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted October 1, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Could be that the mole is Woolard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted October 2, 2014 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 582 Content Count: 22,680 Reputation: 5,816 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Could be that the mole is Woolard. Woolard hasn't been in the Athletics building in months. It isn't him. I don't know everyone in Athletics and the Bulls Club, but there are not a lot of people left from the Leavitt years. If someone wanted to do some research it could probably be narrowed down. Only a couple of people that I know of. Don't think Judy or the Board of Trustees would bother with some of the stories that he breaks or that they would even have knowledge of things like scheduling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now