Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

USF has highest rated non-P5 2014 recruiting class


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  555
  • Content Count:  14,415
  • Reputation:   445
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  07/25/2008

 

 

 

I got all excited when USF had a top 25 class. Still waiting on a conference championship.

*****? :D

 

 

We get it, let's wait until these recruits sign and then play to see if they pan out. We're just happy that we're pulling together a great class so far (sub 40). Would you rather us be ranked in the 50's, 60's or 70's so yo could then complain how Taggs isn't recruiting well? I have a feeling no matter what the circumstances, you'd find a way to complain about our class so far.

 

Wrong...if Ironside signed, he'd deem it our best haul yet.

 

 

You're the wrong one. Wouldn't know until 3 or 4 years from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  112
  • Content Count:  8,159
  • Reputation:   864
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/25/2008

Seems like a slow recruiting weekend, eh? Sort of a "it's quiet, too quiet" moment three days before NSD. Was hoping for some more action with so many slots left for us...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  93
  • Content Count:  3,048
  • Reputation:   316
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  11/24/2005

Seems like a slow recruiting weekend, eh? Sort of a "it's quiet, too quiet" moment three days before NSD. Was hoping for some more action with so many slots left for us...

I think it's become obvious at this point that we are not going to use all our spots, absent a really wild turn of events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  3,222
  • Reputation:   387
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  07/30/2011

I think a couple will be used for people to earn a scholly like most years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  4,663
  • Reputation:   401
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  09/24/2012

When are transfers usually made public? Wondering if we grab Blakely or not..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  86
  • Content Count:  17,061
  • Reputation:   1,429
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  09/15/2005

Doesn't matter if wins aren't produced.

Until then we suck until we don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  85
  • Content Count:  5,431
  • Reputation:   770
  • Days Won:  16
  • Joined:  02/08/2009

When are transfers usually made public? Wondering if we grab Blakely or not..

If we get Blakely, that's 3 stud RBs this haul (assuming we get D Johnson).  I worry they can't all play, and we still have Tice & McCray.

 

If Blakely is still a stud, he could be a 1 & Done, two years, while the younger guys RS.  But I suppose this is a good issue to have, unless it drives a good RB away, while we're still trying to figure out which is the best RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  108
  • Content Count:  2,484
  • Reputation:   288
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/26/2005

When are transfers usually made public? Wondering if we grab Blakely or not..

I think we get Johnson and Mack...Blakely goes elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  93
  • Content Count:  3,048
  • Reputation:   316
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  11/24/2005

Even if Blakely were to transfer here (which I agree is probably unlikely if we sign the two we are hoping for), he would just be a depth guy at this point.

Edited by WWMJD
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

 

When are transfers usually made public? Wondering if we grab Blakely or not..

If we get Blakely, that's 3 stud RBs this haul (assuming we get D Johnson).  I worry they can't all play, and we still have Tice & McCray.

 

If Blakely is still a stud, he could be a 1 & Done, two years, while the younger guys RS.  But I suppose this is a good issue to have, unless it drives a good RB away, while we're still trying to figure out which is the best RB.

 

Who knows what Blakely's priorities are and if they match up with what we have to offer. We had a ton of playing time to offer QBs and RBs last year and Bench was the only one to take the bait. We lost out on what we thought was a perfect situation for Dyer, Trickett, Brandon Mitchell, etc. but they had other things in mind besides just playing time and USF didn't fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.