Bulls1181 Posted September 15, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 170 Content Count: 5,722 Reputation: 366 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/03/2011 Share Posted September 15, 2015 As long as the new QB is a pocket passer we should have a chance. We proved last week that we can't stop the run.. Careful what you wish for.................. Edsall is changing to a better, more experienced QB to try and get a win. If his risk pays off with a win and CWT stays with QF and loses, who do you think wins the argument? Edsal had a reason to make the change. We are still trying to figure out who gives us the best chance to win. If QF struggles, you better believe Bench will get his chance. QF had a below average game against FSU but he did take care of the football. That is where Bench struggles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted September 15, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Steven Bench has never won a game in college and has proven to be easily flustered when pressured and is a turnover machine. Steven Bench is an athletic Bobby Eveld... and by athletic I mean he runs faster. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted September 15, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted September 15, 2015 should be a fairly competitive game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hbryan Posted September 15, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 121 Content Count: 4,259 Reputation: 39 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/16/2006 Share Posted September 15, 2015 As long as the new QB is a pocket passer we should have a chance. We proved last week that we can't stop the run.. Careful what you wish for.................. Edsall is changing to a better, more experienced QB to try and get a win. If his risk pays off with a win and CWT stays with QF and loses, who do you think wins the argument? Edsal had a reason to make the change. We are still trying to figure out who gives us the best chance to win. If QF struggles, you better believe Bench will get his chance. QF had a below average game against FSU but he did take care of the football. That is where Bench struggles. What? He threw an interception in the endzone and had at least one dropped pick 6. I would not call that taking care of the football. If SB gets derided for a Maryland game where he had one INT and 8 catchable drops, QF should likewise get derided for giving away 6 points, nearly providing 6 points and having 1 in 13 third down efficiency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted September 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted September 16, 2015 As long as the new QB is a pocket passer we should have a chance. We proved last week that we can't stop the run.. Nope, I think we just proved we can't stop Dalvin Cook. I don't think we won't be facing another RB of his caliber in the remainder of our schedule. With Whitehurst and Harris coming back at LB, I expect our run defense to improve from here on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullyPulpit Posted September 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 365 Content Count: 6,466 Reputation: 1,893 Days Won: 35 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted September 16, 2015 As long as the new QB is a pocket passer we should have a chance. We proved last week that we can't stop the run.. Careful what you wish for.................. Edsall is changing to a better, more experienced QB to try and get a win. If his risk pays off with a win and CWT stays with QF and loses, who do you think wins the argument? Edsal had a reason to make the change. We are still trying to figure out who gives us the best chance to win. If QF struggles, you better believe Bench will get his chance. QF had a below average game against FSU but he did take care of the football. That is where Bench struggles. What? He threw an interception in the endzone and had at least one dropped pick 6. I would not call that taking care of the football. If SB gets derided for a Maryland game where he had one INT and 8 catchable drops, QF should likewise get derided for giving away 6 points, nearly providing 6 points and having 1 in 13 third down efficiency. You can't compare QBs from different games. FSU's defense this year will likely end up much higher ranked than Maryland's in 2014. Why can't everyone sit back, relax, and see how it all plays out? Bench got his chance last year and didn't seize the opportunity. QF is just now getting his chance and, thus far, has won a game he was supposed to and lost one he was supposed to. This will be a make or break game for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted September 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted September 16, 2015 As long as the new QB is a pocket passer we should have a chance. We proved last week that we can't stop the run.. Careful what you wish for.................. Edsall is changing to a better, more experienced QB to try and get a win. If his risk pays off with a win and CWT stays with QF and loses, who do you think wins the argument? Edsal had a reason to make the change. We are still trying to figure out who gives us the best chance to win. If QF struggles, you better believe Bench will get his chance. QF had a below average game against FSU but he did take care of the football. That is where Bench struggles. What? He threw an interception in the endzone and had at least one dropped pick 6. I would not call that taking care of the football. If SB gets derided for a Maryland game where he had one INT and 8 catchable drops, QF should likewise get derided for giving away 6 points, nearly providing 6 points and having 1 in 13 third down efficiency. Honestly, although the pass wasn't just awesome, I think it was more on Dillon that Flowers. It was a "go get it", and Dillon didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPR Posted September 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,042 Reputation: 279 Days Won: 10 Joined: 03/09/2010 Share Posted September 16, 2015 As long as the new QB is a pocket passer we should have a chance. We proved last week that we can't stop the run.. Careful what you wish for.................. Edsall is changing to a better, more experienced QB to try and get a win. If his risk pays off with a win and CWT stays with QF and loses, who do you think wins the argument? Edsal had a reason to make the change. We are still trying to figure out who gives us the best chance to win. If QF struggles, you better believe Bench will get his chance. QF had a below average game against FSU but he did take care of the football. That is where Bench struggles. What? He threw an interception in the endzone and had at least one dropped pick 6. I would not call that taking care of the football. If SB gets derided for a Maryland game where he had one INT and 8 catchable drops, QF should likewise get derided for giving away 6 points, nearly providing 6 points and having 1 in 13 third down efficiency. Honestly, although the pass wasn't just awesome, I think it was more on Dillon that Flowers. It was a "go get it", and Dillon didn't. I just saw the replay. The pass was freakin terrible. The only player that could catch that ball was the defender. If asked, I'm sure Flowers would say he threw a horrible ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted September 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 86 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted September 16, 2015 I hope their new kid throws it into USF bellies often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
libby_arts Posted September 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 6 Content Count: 715 Reputation: 107 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/12/2012 Share Posted September 16, 2015 One of the main things a WR coach teaches is that you must be aware of what's going on. You must be able to shift from offense to defense. You either go after the ball you can catch or you defend a bad pass from being caught. Watching is not encouraged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now