Jump to content

  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Post spring depth chart

tburns
 Share

Recommended Posts

Triple B Toro Magnifico

Triple B

Posted
  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,587
  • Reputation:   10,853
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005
Posted

So a couple of weeks ago Taggart was talking about the need to name a starting QB.  Now he's saying that you can't name a starting QB based on one game or one scrimmage, so he isn't going to name one.  He could have said that weeks ago, but he was saying the coaches would name on starter.  

 

How many spring games did he think they were going to play?  Did USF cancel a six game spring season?

 

What Taggart says one day is contradicted the next.  You can't run any organization that way and expect to get results.  It's no wonder the team has been miserable the last two years.  The players never know what the plan is from one day to the next.

 

Please post some links to actual CWT quotes where he has contradicted himself about this ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

WeWere#2Once
WeWere#2Once

Chill the **** out. it is spring ball and we have two good QB's that are finally competing with one another. you say..He's a flip flipper.. He's going to flip flop halfway through game one... becaus

raptorcj
raptorcj

I heard it was our meal program...

DogeRiver
DogeRiver

Agreed. He'd be playing back-up wherever he went. Worst case scenario for bench here is that quinton flowers becomes the second coming of Grothe and stays healthy the entire year and Bench only gets

Who'sYourData? Toro Magnifico

Who'sYourData?

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006
Posted

 

So a couple of weeks ago Taggart was talking about the need to name a starting QB.  Now he's saying that you can't name a starting QB based on one game or one scrimmage, so he isn't going to name one.  He could have said that weeks ago, but he was saying the coaches would name on starter.  

 

How many spring games did he think they were going to play?  Did USF cancel a six game spring season?

 

What Taggart says one day is contradicted the next.  You can't run any organization that way and expect to get results.  It's no wonder the team has been miserable the last two years.  The players never know what the plan is from one day to the next.

 

Please post some links to actual CWT quotes where he has contradicted himself about this ...

 

 

Sigh.  Here we go again.  It being late tonight, I might not be able to dig up his quotes from a few weeks ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Who'sYourData? Toro Magnifico

Who'sYourData?

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006
Posted (edited)

 

 

So a couple of weeks ago Taggart was talking about the need to name a starting QB.  Now he's saying that you can't name a starting QB based on one game or one scrimmage, so he isn't going to name one.  He could have said that weeks ago, but he was saying the coaches would name on starter.  

 

How many spring games did he think they were going to play?  Did USF cancel a six game spring season?

 

What Taggart says one day is contradicted the next.  You can't run any organization that way and expect to get results.  It's no wonder the team has been miserable the last two years.  The players never know what the plan is from one day to the next.

 

Please post some links to actual CWT quotes where he has contradicted himself about this ...

 

 

Sigh.  Here we go again.  It being late tonight, I might not be able to dig up his quotes from a few weeks ago. 

 

 

My apologies.  Apparently he did say that a starter would be named "if we feel comfortable".  I guess he isn't comfortable, despite saying that "But I think it's important that we eventually name (one) so that guy can go and be the leader, and this entire football team knows who their leader is going to be and can get behind him and get rolling."

 

This, of course, is a flop from previous years when he never thought it was important to name a starter before the Friday of game week.   But technically he didn't exactly contradict himself, so now I feel much better.

 

Trip, you were right.

 

Oops, almost forgot the link.

 

http://www.tampabay.com/sports/college/usf-still-adjusting-to-new-offense/2223257

Edited by ShadowBull
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Triple B Toro Magnifico

Triple B

Posted
  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,587
  • Reputation:   10,853
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005
Posted

 

 

 

So a couple of weeks ago Taggart was talking about the need to name a starting QB.  Now he's saying that you can't name a starting QB based on one game or one scrimmage, so he isn't going to name one.  He could have said that weeks ago, but he was saying the coaches would name on starter.  

 

How many spring games did he think they were going to play?  Did USF cancel a six game spring season?

 

What Taggart says one day is contradicted the next.  You can't run any organization that way and expect to get results.  It's no wonder the team has been miserable the last two years.  The players never know what the plan is from one day to the next.

 

Please post some links to actual CWT quotes where he has contradicted himself about this ...

 

 

Sigh.  Here we go again.  It being late tonight, I might not be able to dig up his quotes from a few weeks ago. 

 

 

My apologies.  Apparently he did say that a starter would be named "if we feel comfortable".  I guess he isn't comfortable, despite saying that "But I think it's important that we eventually name (one) so that guy can go and be the leader, and this entire football team knows who their leader is going to be and can get behind him and get rolling."

 

I think we all can agree that it's important they eventually name one. We haven't really done all that well with 11 players on offense so only going with 10 would not appear to be a wise move ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BayIslandBull Mentor

BayIslandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  54
  • Content Count:  1,141
  • Reputation:   412
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/24/2011
Posted

Most concerned about the oline, 3 out of 5 starters are under 300#'s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raptorcj Toro Magnifico

raptorcj

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  18
  • Content Count:  8,878
  • Reputation:   1,266
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  07/12/2013
Posted

 

"If we don't, then we'll go into the fall."

That's what I remembered. I think he's always WANTED to name a starter at QB. If he just wanted to keep everyone guessing, he'd do the "OR" with a lot more positions. But if there's a clear position pick (like Mack for instance), he writes him in. If it clears up quickly in fall, I think we'll see a name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JTrue Toro Magnifico

JTrue

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011
Posted

He also needs to tread lightly. If he outright named Flowers the starter and Bench decided to transfer as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BullsFanInTX Toro Magnifico

BullsFanInTX

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  222
  • Content Count:  4,210
  • Reputation:   647
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  08/17/2006
Posted

Hopefully that means we have two capable QB's!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MaltLiquorBull Toro Magnifico

MaltLiquorBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  96
  • Content Count:  4,074
  • Reputation:   1,383
  • Days Won:  14
  • Joined:  01/09/2006
Posted

Hopefully that means we have two capable QB's!  

 

Hopefully.  But that's not what it meant last year and the year before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

He also needs to tread lightly. If he outright named Flowers the starter and Bench decided to transfer as well...

 

Bench won't transfer. He could sit out a year, and play one more... I just don't see that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.

Got it!
Dismiss