DELdaBull Posted February 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 86 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I don't care what happens in 2014 as long as we beat that other team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted February 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I like how the article calls us a small school and a midmajor. We should be comparing ourselves to the Gator's and Noles and not western Michigan. ROFLMAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted February 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Great article. Taggart and company killed it. Edited February 14, 2014 by ShadowBull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDYZR Posted February 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 486 Content Count: 12,465 Reputation: 2,846 Days Won: 25 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted February 14, 2014 Another interesting article. http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2014/2/5/5382140/recruiting-matters-why-the-sites-get-the-rankings-right?utm_source=sbnation&utm_medium=nextclicks&utm_campaign=articlebottom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB Posted February 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 339 Content Count: 3,692 Reputation: 247 Days Won: 2 Joined: 09/08/2004 Share Posted February 14, 2014 So the first article has us above of Louisville and Iowa and the second article lists as below Louisville and Iowa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted February 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted February 14, 2014 So the first article has us above of Louisville and Iowa and the second article lists as below Louisville and Iowa. The first article is specific to the most recent class, the second article covers the past 5 classes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted February 15, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted February 15, 2014 I stopped reading at mid major. Was USF a "mid major" 5 years ago? What is USF doing differently that what they were doing 5 years ago. These blanket terms have got to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted February 15, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted February 15, 2014 I stopped reading at mid major. Was USF a "mid major" 5 years ago? What is USF doing differently that what they were doing 5 years ago. These blanket terms have got to go. In football, I thought mid major has always referred to the tier right below BCS, now P5 ....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted February 15, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Share Posted February 15, 2014 (edited) I stopped reading at mid major. Was USF a "mid major" 5 years ago? What is USF doing differently that what they were doing 5 years ago. These blanket terms have got to go. In football, I thought mid major has always referred to the tier right below BCS, now P5 ....? It's an ESPN made up term so that they don't have to pay as much for the "product". So sick of this propaganda. It's Goebbelesque in it's nature. The whole P5 diatribe is the same type of effort. Edited February 15, 2014 by Bullwinkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted February 15, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted February 15, 2014 I stopped reading at mid major. Was USF a "mid major" 5 years ago? What is USF doing differently that what they were doing 5 years ago. These blanket terms have got to go. In football, I thought mid major has always referred to the tier right below BCS, now P5 ....? It's an ESPN made up term so that they don't have to pay as much for the "product". So sick of this propaganda. It's Goebbelesque in it's nature. The whole P5 diatribe is the same type of effort. It apparently was coined by Jack Kvancz in 1977. Has to be true because Wikipedia says so .... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now