Apis Bull Posted August 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted August 24, 2013 Can't we just get one of these I mean a high school did why can't we? We probably could. However, our fans would hate it and it would be less appealing to recruits. That's worse than what UCF has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted August 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted August 24, 2013 USF will not build a ghetto stadium. Doug Woolard went on record saying when we DO build one, it will mimic Minnesota's new stadium. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
79 Bull Posted August 24, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 687 Content Count: 7,660 Reputation: 1,220 Days Won: 6 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted August 24, 2013 The dog track site is a really bad idea for a stadium. I agree OCS (and not at the mall) or don't build at all. Isn't there some new soccer team starting with MLS aspirations. Maybe build a joint stadium with them on campus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPR Posted August 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,042 Reputation: 279 Days Won: 10 Joined: 03/09/2010 Share Posted August 24, 2013 The dog track site is a really bad idea for a stadium. I agree OCS (and not at the mall) or don't build at all. Isn't there some new soccer team starting with MLS aspirations. Maybe build a joint stadium with them on campus. Isn't that team in Orlando? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
79 Bull Posted August 24, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 687 Content Count: 7,660 Reputation: 1,220 Days Won: 6 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted August 24, 2013 The dog track site is a really bad idea for a stadium. I agree OCS (and not at the mall) or don't build at all. Isn't there some new soccer team starting with MLS aspirations. Maybe build a joint stadium with them on campus. Isn't that team in Orlando? http://www.tampabay.com/news/humaninterest/new-pro-soccer-team-to-announce-stadium-plans-in-tampa/1263897 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sheriff Posted August 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 721 Content Count: 6,754 Reputation: 806 Days Won: 19 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted August 24, 2013 Here's Lara Wade's information so we can assist her in getting the OCS in her/USF's thought process. Lara Wade, Media/Public Affairs Manager Main: 813-974-9060Cell: 813-833-1498 larawade@usf.edu Please don't hesitate to contact her. We have to build this one step at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted August 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted August 24, 2013 Email sent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commbull Posted August 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 477 Reputation: 9 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/07/2007 Share Posted August 24, 2013 I wouldn't mind a baseball and football stadium that's connected like our baseball and softball stadiums on campus. There could be 2 separate fields opposite of each other, but the entrance, walkways, bathrooms, concessions, etc... would be connected. I hate multi-purpose stadiums, they look bushleague. Not in favor of moving USF to a different off campus stadium but Aloha Stadium shows that multi- purpose stadiums do not have to be bush league. Go to http://www.andrewclem.com/Baseball/AlohaStadium.html#place to see the baseball and football configurations. Seats 50,000 too so its about the right size. A duplicate of that stadium makes some sense. That stadium, with what must be moveable stands is pretty cool. That would work, but I can't see the Rays wanting to be on campus--makes no sense--and I can't see why USF would want to be in a different Off Campus Community stadium than the one we're in now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FazaUSF Posted August 25, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 94 Content Count: 2,305 Reputation: 670 Days Won: 11 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Actually the quote from Lara Wade is technically correct, but literally incorrect. The OCS is currently in the long-term plan for the university, but until a certain amount of funds are raised, there will be no official 'plan' for building it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoolyBully Posted August 25, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 194 Content Count: 6,785 Reputation: 864 Days Won: 3 Joined: 08/01/2000 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Actually the quote from Lara Wade is technically correct, but literally incorrect. The OCS is currently in the long-term plan for the university, but until a certain amount of funds are raised, there will be no official 'plan' for building it. Which is NOT what this board wants to hear! We want to hear that it's the numero uno priority for the University and that the Put That Thang Together committee is meeting on a weekly basis to ensure that OCS is front and center of all else. We're just not down with interpretation. We are exceptionally literal in our parsing of statements from Fowler Ave. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now