Colorado 15 transfers in one day

[Gatorbull325]

16 hours ago, bulloni said:

Its practice tape from before Deion got there so it would be an entirely different offense. Its now coming out on twitter that he's doing this to other players too and the only transfers out that have their film got it on their phones before Deion got there

Glad we didn't pay $30 million for this experiment

 

 

[Outlaw]

7 hours ago, Triple B said:

You sure did and it didn’t make sense then either. Redundancy is one of your strongest qualities. 
 

IF I had to theory craft I think it has to do with power 5 and money first and second the amount of transfers 5/4 star recruits. Smu is in the top 10 with two 4* star recruits. 

Current AAC Ranking 

Edited April 27, 2023 by Outlaw

[Triple B]

1 hour ago, Outlaw said:

IF I had to theory craft I think it has to do with power 5 and money first and second the amount of transfers 5/4 star recruits. Smu is in the top 10 with two 4* star recruits. 

Thinking it has anything to do with money is kind of ridiculous .... and it obviously has nothing to do with a school being P5/G5/FCS since they're all represented in the 1 thru 91 rankings before the ones with 0 points. It's some way somehow based on players' numerical ratings and the database is obviously incomplete. Here's the total list for any who may want to try and figure it out ....

https://247sports.com/Season/2023-Football/TransferTeamRankings/

 

[Cubanbull]

12 hours ago, Outlaw said:

Colorado is ranked 1st with their transfer class and we are ranked 93. I am not sure how the hell these scores work or what they mean because we got 17 transfers and 0 for a score. I think it means 247 just doesn't care enough to rate USF. Either way we can't claim we got the number one transfer class just for a day.

Here is the reality of Transfer scores. A player transferring into a P school gets re-rated and that score is used in rankings. A player going to a nonP school doesn’t get rated as fast. As of now none of our players coming in have been rated

[belgianbull]

14 minutes ago, Cubanbull said:

Here is the reality of Transfer scores. A player transferring into a P school gets re-rated and that score is used in rankings. A player going to a nonP school doesn’t get rated as fast. As of now none of our players coming in have been rated

A lot of players that we are getting through the transfer portal are really hard to rate due to a lack of playing time.  I will always prefer a player who put up decent numbers at a group of five team over a third stringer at a power 5 school.

Certainly if you can recruit a starter or contributor from a Power 5 team even better like we did with Bohanon. I like the RB we recruited from Florida and the WR from Minnesota.

[Cubanbull]

4 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

A lot of players that we are getting through the transfer portal are really hard to rate due to a lack of playing time.  I will always prefer a player who put up decent numbers at a group of five team over a third stringer at a power 5 school.

Certainly if you can recruit a starter or contributor from a Power 5 team even better like we did with Bohanon. I like the RB we recruited from Florida and the WR from Minnesota.

Agree,but here is the reality. None of USF’s incoming transfers have been re-rated. Yet TE Jackson Long that transferred from USF to GT has been re-rated as .8500, now you tell me what college stats they used in that re-rating?

Edited April 27, 2023 by Cubanbull

[SilverBull]

3 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

I will always prefer a player who put up decent numbers at a group of five team over a third stringer at a power 5 school.

So you're saying evidence of success is a better indicator of success than no evidence of success?  I'll buy that.

[jchem1995]

44 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

A lot of players that we are getting through the transfer portal are really hard to rate due to a lack of playing time.  I will always prefer a player who put up decent numbers at a group of five team over a third stringer at a power 5 school.

Certainly if you can recruit a starter or contributor from a Power 5 team even better like we did with Bohanon. I like the RB we recruited from Florida and the WR from Minnesota.

Belgian , Bohanan was a bust in my opinion. We have seen this transfer qb thing too many times. I like Byron leading the Bulls.

[belgianbull]

43 minutes ago, jchem1995 said:

Belgian , Bohanan was a bust in my opinion. We have seen this transfer qb thing too many times. I like Byron leading the Bulls.

Bohanon started playing well and had Tulane on the ropes before his injury, so he is not a bad option to have. But I like Byron as well, but we have seen last year that QB injuries happen, so having two good QB's is a necessity. Either QB can be the guy if necessary.

Our QB situation is a good problem to have

[Outlaw]

53 minutes ago, jchem1995 said:

Belgian , Bohanan was a bust in my opinion. We have seen this transfer qb thing too many times. I like Byron leading the Bulls.

I'm with you he got out played by a true freshmen as 5th year senior. His stats put him in Bottom quartile of college football qbs. He could rebound with better coaching.  I hope we win and I will support whoever Golesh thinks is the guy. My opinion it is not Gerry. 

Edited April 27, 2023 by Outlaw