E.T. Posted January 5, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 4,734 Content Count: 37,595 Reputation: 2,329 Days Won: 29 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Glad he talked about the OCS ... location should be known this summer and expects 2027 to play. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lewis Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 2,900 Reputation: 2,333 Days Won: 33 Joined: 09/25/2013 Share Posted January 5, 2022 10 minutes ago, Dave_Glaser said: What could USF Athletics be if we got behind it with our donations, our attendance, and just a generally positive mindset? We'll never know right here in this little digital cesspool, but it's worth contemplating . . . It can be what everyone who posts on this board wants it to be. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,612 Content Count: 74,587 Reputation: 10,853 Days Won: 423 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted January 5, 2022 6 minutes ago, Bull Nut said: I get it... COVID, Stability, 10 year plan, sustainable success, yada yada. I'm just not buying it and I don't think it's too much to ask for a .500 record in football and basketball. It's not too much to ask and I'm sure what's being done is in hopes of surpassing that modest goal .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheUpperHand Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 44 Content Count: 2,034 Reputation: 1,409 Days Won: 20 Joined: 06/29/2007 Share Posted January 5, 2022 11 minutes ago, Dave_Glaser said: What could USF Athletics be if we got behind it with our donations, our attendance, and just a generally positive mindset? Rather than bleeding money while no one watches us go 2-10 with the fanbase saying "This really sucks," we could change all that so that the athletics department could turn a profit for administrators while 65,000 people watch us go 2-10 with the fanbase saying "This is fine." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,019 Reputation: 10,817 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted January 5, 2022 12 minutes ago, hm101 said: Reasonable people can disagree on that. You may have identified the issue.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Nut Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 1,327 Reputation: 597 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/19/2018 Share Posted January 5, 2022 5 minutes ago, hm101 said: only to have Jeff leave and we are back to square one Back to square one isn't that far back lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outlaw Posted January 5, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,423 Reputation: 3,204 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) Most of us here donate and/or attend games. The results on the field are on the coaching staff and the university not going all in on investing in facilities and athletics. The positive seems usf and vmk are finally taking it seriously with an ipf breaking ground and planning an ocs. Edited January 5, 2022 by Outlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,612 Content Count: 74,587 Reputation: 10,853 Days Won: 423 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted January 5, 2022 27 minutes ago, Dave_Glaser said: What could USF Athletics be if we got behind it with our donations, our attendance, and just a generally positive mindset? 9 minutes ago, TheUpperHand said: Rather than bleeding money while no one watches us go 2-10 with the fanbase saying "This really sucks," we could change all that so that the athletics department could turn a profit for administrators while 65,000 people watch us go 2-10 with the fanbase saying "This is fine." Well that mindset may certainly explain why a lot of whiners don't bother to significantly invest financially in USF ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,019 Reputation: 10,817 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted January 5, 2022 32 minutes ago, E.T. said: Glad he talked about the OCS ... location should be known this summer and expects 2027 to play. And his contract runs through 2028....He has the time to accomplish the goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostbuster Posted January 5, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 730 Reputation: 438 Days Won: 4 Joined: 09/07/2010 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I liked hearing Kelly talk and answer questions. Think he's got the right plan in general. I understand he wants to show a commitment to coaches who are buying into his approach, while also showing commitment and stability to other (big12) leagues. However nothing I heard convinced me that giving up our advantage on the CJS contract (still 3 years left) was needed. Just seems like 'a sign of good faith' on USFs part that will always appear bad from the outside because you're rewarding the most visible failure (on field results) of the most visible sport (football). If he wanted a press conference to say USF will have coaching stability through 2023 (which go check Twitter/news outlets, that's the headline USF is promoting), he still could have done that without the football extension. Oh well I'll try to trust the process and stop whining about it for now.... but oof it's a tough pill to swallow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now