Bullrush33 Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,801 Reputation: 788 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2018 I can see I struck a nerve with the Blake apologists. If this performance is the same the next game I will resurrect this thread and if I am wrong I will eat crow but I am just not seeing progression with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheBus Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 15 Content Count: 740 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/02/2011 Share Posted September 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Bullrush33 said: I can see I struck a nerve with the Blake apologists. If this performance is the same the next game I will resurrect this thread and if I am wrong I will eat crow but I am just not seeing progression with him. TIL 2 total TDs, no turnovers, 60% completion is a bad performance for a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrush33 Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,801 Reputation: 788 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2018 Just now, OnTheBus said: TIL 2 total TDs, no turnovers, 60% completion is a bad performance for a QB. It isnt great. Its what I would expect from Q FLowers and not Blake since his strength is suppose to be passing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bausfkid Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 295 Content Count: 4,131 Reputation: 818 Days Won: 15 Joined: 06/20/2005 Share Posted September 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, Bullrush33 said: I can see I struck a nerve with the Blake apologists. If this performance is the same the next game I will resurrect this thread and if I am wrong I will eat crow but I am just not seeing progression with him. Struck a nerve? I think you hit deep on your dumb bone. You sound like your football acumen is on life support. Enjoy the win and take the biweek to brush up on Football for Dummies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 23, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bullrush33 said: It isnt great. Its what I would expect from Q FLowers and not Blake since his strength is suppose to be passing This isn’t even quality trolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OcalaBull2 Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 74 Content Count: 2,322 Reputation: 775 Days Won: 2 Joined: 07/02/2016 Share Posted September 23, 2018 16 minutes ago, Bullrush33 said: I can see I struck a nerve with the Blake apologists. If this performance is the same the next game I will resurrect this thread and if I am wrong I will eat crow but I am just not seeing progression with him. I get that you’re frustrated, as many of us are as well. But you truly believe Oladokun and Kean are going to solve these problems? Barnett accounted for over 400 yards of offense in the first road game of the year in Chicago...I just can’t find any scenario where either one of our backups would have brought us to a victory in both games that we were down by 2 touchdowns. He has over 1,000 yds passing in 4 games, and ALMOST had that in 3. If we were to put in a different QB with stats like that we would probably have people picketing outside of RayJay. Not to mention we’re 4-0. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrush33 Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,801 Reputation: 788 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2018 5 minutes ago, JTrue said: This isn’t even quality trolling. Not trying to troll just making my own observation. I hope I am wrong but I see a kink in the armor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 23, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Bullrush33 said: Not trying to troll just making my own observation. I hope I am wrong but I see a kink in the armor. And you think a guy who once ran for negative yards IN A SEASON is the answer because of his running ability? I was giving you the benefit of the doubt saying it was a troll job. Edited September 23, 2018 by JTrue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted September 23, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Bullrush33 said: Not trying to troll just making my own observation. I hope I am wrong but I see a kink in the armor. Kinks were actually used shape, design, and strengthen most types of bodily armor. So that's good. Edited September 23, 2018 by Calibull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodi Posted September 23, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 12 Content Count: 3,233 Reputation: 1,169 Days Won: 8 Joined: 10/17/2013 Share Posted September 23, 2018 See this!!!! Yet people claim canibis has no ill effects. Lay off the Hash brownies brau. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now