Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Content Count:  90
  • Reputation:   23
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/15/2014

Go into the next round of tv negotiations with a figure of 8 million per team.  The AAC has solidified itself as the 6th best conference, no question. We have put a team in the NY6 bowl every year except 1. At some point in every season we have 3 teams ranked. There is no doubt we are above the rest of the G5 and we are due a significant increase in tv revenue because of it.  Put in the contract that negotiations can reopen if the conference expands. After the AAC  contract is solidified go after the following schools for football only:

Boise State, San Diego State, Air Force, and Army.

The MWC will not be able to compete with the AAC in tv revenue as they have not made any strides in competition since the formation of the AAC.  It would be financially irresponsible for them to decline an invite if the AAC schools are making 4 times what the MWC school's are. Now you have solidified yourself with 2 more major markets, all of the service academies and greater competition and strength of schedule.  Each year the AAC will start the season with 3 schools ranked and the committee should view a greater strength of schedule for playoff consideration.  Each team plays 7 division games, 2 crossover conference games, 3 ooc games with 1 cupcake and 2 P5 teams.  

Then renegotiate going in with a figure of 15 million but settling for no less than 12 million.   The AAC will be the only conference with coast to coast viewing from Thursday through late Saturday night.

I feel like this is the only way the AAC even sniffs the playoffs.  This would be a solid conference with great value and an undeniable power 6 especially with the added revenue.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

During TV negotiations, the broadcasters would tell us if adding team X, would add value.  I don't seeing us adding them in hopes of getting more money.  I think it would have to be a surety that they would add more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  129
  • Content Count:  3,116
  • Reputation:   473
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  11/28/2010

2 hours ago, USFsurfer06 said:

Go into the next round of tv negotiations with a figure of 8 million per team.  The AAC has solidified itself as the 6th best conference, no question. We have put a team in the NY6 bowl every year except 1. At some point in every season we have 3 teams ranked. There is no doubt we are above the rest of the G5 and we are due a significant increase in tv revenue because of it.  Put in the contract that negotiations can reopen if the conference expands. After the AAC  contract is solidified go after the following schools for football only:

Boise State, San Diego State, Air Force, and Army.

The MWC will not be able to compete with the AAC in tv revenue as they have not made any strides in competition since the formation of the AAC.  It would be financially irresponsible for them to decline an invite if the AAC schools are making 4 times what the MWC school's are. Now you have solidified yourself with 2 more major markets, all of the service academies and greater competition and strength of schedule.  Each year the AAC will start the season with 3 schools ranked and the committee should view a greater strength of schedule for playoff consideration.  Each team plays 7 division games, 2 crossover conference games, 3 ooc games with 1 cupcake and 2 P5 teams.  

Then renegotiate going in with a figure of 15 million but settling for no less than 12 million.   The AAC will be the only conference with coast to coast viewing from Thursday through late Saturday night.

I feel like this is the only way the AAC even sniffs the playoffs.  This would be a solid conference with great value and an undeniable power 6 especially with the added revenue.

 

You gotta earn that revenue through viewership. I would love to have Army and Air Force in the conference, but if you add them, then you have an issue with teams beating up on the military academies late in the year as most teams will already have seen the triple option once (once you see it it's much easier to defend). I can't help but wonder if Navy is regretting their decision a little bit. They've lost their starter and backup each of the last two years to injury. The military academies are great for viewership and they can recruit well where they are, but end of day their top priority is producing military officers, not football players.

That said: if you add three teams, then everyone gets to recruit in Florida and Texas every year and face at least two military academies, one at home, one on the road. Maybe then you can add the Armed Forces Bowl to the lineup and get the Holiday bowl on board. I think many of these lower P5 bowls would jump at the chance to select a military academy every year especially if there's a military base in the area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

11 hours ago, USFsurfer06 said:

Go into the next round of tv negotiations with a figure of 8 million per team.  The AAC has solidified itself as the 6th best conference, no question. We have put a team in the NY6 bowl every year except 1. At some point in every season we have 3 teams ranked. There is no doubt we are above the rest of the G5 and we are due a significant increase in tv revenue because of it.  Put in the contract that negotiations can reopen if the conference expands. After the AAC  contract is solidified go after the following schools for football only:

Boise State, San Diego State, Air Force, and Army.

The MWC will not be able to compete with the AAC in tv revenue as they have not made any strides in competition since the formation of the AAC.  It would be financially irresponsible for them to decline an invite if the AAC schools are making 4 times what the MWC school's are. Now you have solidified yourself with 2 more major markets, all of the service academies and greater competition and strength of schedule.  Each year the AAC will start the season with 3 schools ranked and the committee should view a greater strength of schedule for playoff consideration.  Each team plays 7 division games, 2 crossover conference games, 3 ooc games with 1 cupcake and 2 P5 teams.  

Then renegotiate going in with a figure of 15 million but settling for no less than 12 million.   The AAC will be the only conference with coast to coast viewing from Thursday through late Saturday night.

I feel like this is the only way the AAC even sniffs the playoffs.  This would be a solid conference with great value and an undeniable power 6 especially with the added revenue.

 

This is where your argument falls apart

A does not imply B

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

Also, Army and Navy are on record as saying they won't move the game from it's traditional date.

Therefore, until this policy changes there is ZERO chance of Army joining the AAC.

Air Force is another story, they would be a good addition

Need to add two Cali schools, not one, so SDSU and Fresno State would be my choices.

That leaves one spot

Not sure about Boise, other teams might fit the AAC profile better: Northern Illinois, Buffalo, UNLV, or Colorado State would all be good choices

Or, maybe Wichita State decides to re-start their football program...

Edited by charsibb
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,207
  • Content Count:  18,470
  • Reputation:   899
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/14/2003


Seven-Step Drop: You Wanted an Eight-Team Playoff? You Might Have it Now

"...That should leave the AAC as the selection committee’s choice by default for what will likely be a Peach Bowl trip. UCF continues to impress and is the easy favorite given the way it is playing but Memphis (8-1, 5-1 out of the West division) and USF (8-1, 5-1 in the East) also control their own destiny for the bid if they win out. The Knights would get both teams at home after Thanksgiving but there’s really not a whole lot standing in the way of the league collecting a nice check and proving they can play with their “Power 6” brothers on a big stage at this point...

Read more at:  https://athlonsports.com/college-football/seven-step-drop-you-wanted-eight-team-playoff-you-might-have-it-now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  34
  • Content Count:  1,733
  • Reputation:   757
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/29/2017

I'm thinking the Black Friday game deserves a lot of credit. It had to hype up interest in the AAC Championship game. But most interesting thing I see there is that the G4 combined only managed half the AAC audience. Pretty much confirms there is no G5.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,207
  • Content Count:  18,470
  • Reputation:   899
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/14/2003

1 minute ago, Gat-Rat Bull said:

I'm thinking the Black Friday game deserves a lot of credit. It had to hype up interest in the AAC Championship game. But most interesting thing I see there is that the G4 combined only managed half the AAC audience. Pretty much confirms there is no G5.

No doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

Will need to put these types of ratings together for multiple seasons for it not to be looked upon as an aberration. Contract negotiations start this Jan though so not sure how much these ratings wil help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    "He is a young and extremely gifted offensive mind, a developer of high-level talent and an elite national recruiter who brings the experience of having played an integral role from the beginning in helping to build one of the most successful programs in college football."

    - Michael Kelly on Jeff Scott  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    We've talked about getting back to being the toughest, most violent people out there. Let's be the best version of ourselves and really get back to the culture of how we (USF) used to step across the line and play anybody. Let's hold on to the culture of when they were tough … and they (opponents) knew it was going to be long damn day for themselves.

    Kevin Patrick  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.