QB Situation Update

[Who'sYourData?]

14 hours ago, usfbullrider said:

Kean has looked sharp.  So much improvement in him from a year ago when both him and Flowers looked mostly hapless when learning this system for the first time.

I honestly believe that if AW had been ruled eligible last year, he might have taken the job and run with it.  I'd like to think the fact that AW is #3 shows the growth of the other two QBs from a year ago, and means we have real depth at QB for the first time ever.

[OcalaBull2]

On August 22, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Calibull said:

Quinton Flowers showed one thing last season that I think was really important.  He displayed poise and competitiveness we hadn't seen from a QB in a long time.  He puts it on the line... but I'd like him to not do any more helicopter touchdowns... I really think that caused us the Navy game.  But he seems to be maturing nicely.  I'm excited for this season... but jeeze louise... imagine next season.  We could be about to make one of the best runs in school history!

That's highly possible 

[Triple B]

53 minutes ago, GaUSFBull said:

... Don't do it

[bullsmeanbusiness]

 

[BullsFanInTX]

Asiantii Woulard ‏@Asiantii4 13m13 minutes ago

Fractured foot... Smh I gotta be being tested. Something is always going on.

[Bull-Hornz]

13 minutes ago, bullsmeanbusiness said:

 

 

1 minute ago, BullsFanInTX said:

Asiantii Woulard ‏@Asiantii4 13m13 minutes ago

Fractured foot... Smh I gotta be being tested. Something is always going on.

The plot thickens...wonder if this happened before the decision was made

[Roaming Bull]

4 minutes ago, Bull-Hornz said:

 

The plot thickens...wonder if this happened before the decision was made

I wonder how CWT broke his foot? 

[Bull-Hornz]

6 hours ago, HR Bull said:

I wonder how CWT broke his foot? 

At least CWT has moved onto crushing people in the physical plane

Edited August 24, 2016 by Bull-Hornz

[Bull-Hornz]

8 hours ago, George Jenkins said:

Weren't the two TE sets the basis for the 2 RB + QF formation that we saw last year? Not sure if these were two TE formations, but whatever they were, they were very successful.

Checking highlights of last year; those were actually 3 WR sets.

I believe so...but have to go back and look. If my memory serves me, I remember the typical I-formation set where the "FB" was the TE (S.Price). The nice thing about this wrinkle is that this would essential make the opposing D sell out to the run. You should get a mismatch on atleast one of the eligible receivers, which in the picture below would include both WRs, TE, FB, and RB. Why not used a full back? Well you should have a better mismatch with a TE as a receiver than a FB.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tight_end

Come one gameday!!

Edited August 24, 2016 by Bull-Hornz

[raptorcj]

I still care about the O line and all, but with an apparently stacked WR corps and a mobile, running backfield, I don't see us scoring less than 35 on 9/3...hopefully a lot more.