deters- Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 67 Content Count: 3,749 Reputation: 309 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/22/2008 Share Posted October 14, 2015 He finally had 1 good game, against a team not in the FCS. Don't get too excited. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted October 14, 2015 QF plays better if we can run well.. Bench is just a better passer.The stats don't back up that Bench is a better passer. QF is completing over 60 percent of his passes with 8 TD's and 4 INT's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted October 14, 2015 (edited) He finally had 1 good game, against a team not in the FCS. Don't get too excited.No one is overly excited, we just see solid progress and reason for optimism in QF's play. Edited October 14, 2015 by BullsFanInTX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-Hornz Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 78 Content Count: 1,978 Reputation: 333 Days Won: 7 Joined: 04/19/2007 Share Posted October 14, 2015 The stats don't back up that Bench is a better passer. QF is completing over 60 percent of his passes with 8 TD's and 4 INT's.You cant really say that. The issue with just looking at cmp percentage is that a large percent of QF "passes" are not beyond the line of scrimmage. If SB was asked to make the throws that QF does his cmp percentage would no doubt be above 60 percent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,714 Reputation: 10,932 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 14, 2015 You cant really say that. The issue with just looking at cmp percentage is that a large percent of QF "passes" are not beyond the line of scrimmage. If SB was asked to make the throws that QF does his cmp percentage would no doubt be above 60 percent.Yes, you can say that the stats don't back up that Bench is a better passer .... because they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebullsfan Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 209 Content Count: 2,785 Reputation: 675 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/12/2013 Share Posted October 14, 2015 The real question should be how does he compare to matt and can he every develop to compete stat wise against matt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted October 14, 2015 (edited) You cant really say that. The issue with just looking at cmp percentage is that a large percent of QF "passes" are not beyond the line of scrimmage. If SB was asked to make the throws that QF does his cmp percentage would no doubt be above 60 percent.And yet Bench was a 40% passer 2 years ago and a 49% passer last year. In limited opps this year, his completion percentage is approximately the same as QF's.Again, the stats do not back up that Bench is a better passer. His throws may look prettier, but statistically he is not better. Plus, he far less mobile that QF. Edited October 14, 2015 by BullsFanInTX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-Hornz Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 78 Content Count: 1,978 Reputation: 333 Days Won: 7 Joined: 04/19/2007 Share Posted October 14, 2015 And yet Bench was a 40% passer 2 years ago and a 49% passer last year. In limited opps this year, his completion percentage is approximately the same as QF's.Again, the stats do not back up that Bench is a better passer. His throws may look prettier, but statistically he is not better. Plus, he far less mobile that QF. I have spent enough explaining why this is an illogical conclusion but you guys dont want to listen, so keep living in the world were QF is a better passer than SB... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-Hornz Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 78 Content Count: 1,978 Reputation: 333 Days Won: 7 Joined: 04/19/2007 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Yes, you can say that the stats don't back up that Bench is a better passer .... because they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFBULL_08 Posted October 14, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 48 Content Count: 2,347 Reputation: 661 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/29/2009 Share Posted October 14, 2015 QF plays better if we can run well.. Bench is just a better passer.Every QB should play better with a good running game. It's the passing without the running game that is the tricky part.If Cuse could stop a WR screen to save their lives then they might have won the game. Also, QF would not have looked as good. He's still missing wide open receivers on downfield throws. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now