Should Bench play IF we fall behind early?

[JTrue]

And if Bench leads us to victory, who thinks we'll be ranked on Monday?

[hbryan]

[raptorcj]

Whatever is least embarassing on national tv

Ah, if this could only be predicted. Personally I think QF scrambling for a few yards when the pocket collapses is less embarrassing than SB having to go fetal.

[Paisa el Toro]

No. Next question?

[Bear]

Bench isn't a playmaker

[flsportsfan83]

Bench isn't a playmaker

 

And Flowers is not a QB, so pick your poison

[feardabull]

Flowers may not be a qb, but he sure as hell is better at it than bench is.   

 

I dont want to see bench throw another football

[MMW]

No, he shouldn't.

There isn't much upside to bringing Bench in. Let Flowers develop.

Obviously he will come in at the worst possible time though, and kill any offensive momentum we have.

Bench is a good guy but he was beat out by a sophmore.  Watching him play I see why.  Flowers is still developing and even though he is not what we all dreamed of when he signed he could get better where I think Bench has peaked.  

Even assuming they are even at this point (which they are not) the logical choice is the let Flowers develop.  

 

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

No he shouldn't play IF we fall behind. He should play and start period.

[MaltLiquorBull]

Whoever is out there at QB needs to air it out.  That is the only way to beat this team.  If we lose trying, then so be it.  It beats losing by running up the middle and going 3 and out all day.