bullz97 Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 47 Content Count: 486 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted March 17, 2015 (edited) Anyone think this could be the first truly bad move of Harlan's administration? We can't give away seats right now and we're going to make long-term fans pay more?This kills me. After all these years being loyal, having the grandfather deal head over my head then ripped away. I was told when I went from 8 to 6 tickets if those seats are dropped I can't get those seats back unless I pay the present donor level ($1000) for those seats. So in the VooDoo five article about people adding seats at the grandfathered level can't be correct because I was told more than once by USF tickets reps that I could not add more seats with my grandfathered donation could only add seats at the current donation level.Of course it was correct Well as far as the information I was given more than once by more than one USF rep seats could not be added at grandfathered level. Edited March 17, 2015 by bullz97 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeG Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,984 Content Count: 19,737 Reputation: 3,540 Days Won: 156 Joined: 07/17/2003 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Anyone think this could be the first truly bad move of Harlan's administration? We can't give away seats right now and we're going to make long-term fans pay more? This kills me. After all these years being loyal, having the grandfather deal head over my head then ripped away. I was told when I went from 8 to 6 tickets if those seats are dropped I can't get those seats back unless I pay the present donor level ($1000) for those seats. So in the VooDoo five article about people adding seats at the grandfathered level can't be correct because I was told more than once by USF tickets reps that I could not add more seats with my grandfathered donation could only add seats at the current donation level. Of course it was correct Well as far as the information I was given more than once by more than one USF rep seats could not be added at grandfathered level. there are no grandfathered deals anymore -- just per seat donation levels (see the chart on the first page of this thread). It was the entire point of making the change to simplify the seat options for people and those who manage the tickets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogma Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 303 Content Count: 5,550 Reputation: 866 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/07/2009 Share Posted March 17, 2015 (edited) Anyone think this could be the first truly bad move of Harlan's administration? We can't give away seats right now and we're going to make long-term fans pay more? This kills me. After all these years being loyal, having the grandfather deal head over my head then ripped away. I was told when I went from 8 to 6 tickets if those seats are dropped I can't get those seats back unless I pay the present donor level ($1000) for those seats. So in the VooDoo five article about people adding seats at the grandfathered level can't be correct because I was told more than once by USF tickets reps that I could not add more seats with my grandfathered donation could only add seats at the current donation level. Of course it was correct Well as far as the information I was given more than once by more than one USF rep seats could not be added at grandfathered level. there are no grandfathered deals anymore -- just per seat donation levels (see the chart on the first page of this thread). It was the entire point of making the change to simplify the seat options for people and those who manage the tickets bullz97 is referring that in the past he was told he couldn't add seats to the grandfathered location, in direct contrast to what was posted in the VD5 article Which I remember reading similar posts here in TBP (that it couldn't be done) Edited March 17, 2015 by Dogma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullz97 Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 47 Content Count: 486 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted March 17, 2015 (edited) Anyone think this could be the first truly bad move of Harlan's administration? We can't give away seats right now and we're going to make long-term fans pay more?This kills me. After all these years being loyal, having the grandfather deal head over my head then ripped away. I was told when I went from 8 to 6 tickets if those seats are dropped I can't get those seats back unless I pay the present donor level ($1000) for those seats. So in the VooDoo five article about people adding seats at the grandfathered level can't be correct because I was told more than once by USF tickets reps that I could not add more seats with my grandfathered donation could only add seats at the current donation level.Of course it was correctWell as far as the information I was given more than once by more than one USF rep seats could not be added at grandfathered level.there are no grandfathered deals anymore -- just per seat donation levels (see the chart on the first page of this thread). It was the entire point of making the change to simplify the seat options for people and those who manage the tickets Correct no grandfathered deals anymore. I was talking about the past not the present. Edited March 17, 2015 by bullz97 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls 1 Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 63 Content Count: 551 Reputation: 26 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/31/2002 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Did anyone pay attention to the AAC donor rankings by school in the ticket renewal packet!!! How bad does that look for USF? I’ve done my part for 16 years and will continue to donate. People need to step up or for sure we stay in this conference for ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Did anyone pay attention to the AAC donor rankings by school in the ticket renewal packet!!! How bad does that look for USF? I’ve done my part for 16 years and will continue to donate. People need to step up or for sure we stay in this conference for ever. I wish folks would stop dissing the conference. It's not a bad conference if (BIG IF) we can fix the TV money disparity. The schools are on an upward track, and most have committed to improvement in multiple sports. Obviously the conference isn't where it would like to be yet, but (other than TV money) it's the next best conference for USF to the ACC. I would HATE being a member of the B12. I really don't mind this conference (but we have to fix the TV money). Oh, and did I mention the TV money is bad here? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjlovecub Posted March 17, 2015 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 127 Content Count: 2,118 Reputation: 522 Days Won: 1 Joined: 11/27/2007 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Did anyone pay attention to the AAC donor rankings by school in the ticket renewal packet!!! How bad does that look for USF? I’ve done my part for 16 years and will continue to donate. People need to step up or for sure we stay in this conference for ever. You made me walk to my mailbox at 11pm at night because I was curious. I had no idea we ranked so poorly in giving. I mean I knew we weren't at the top, I just didn't realize basically everyone else was above us - including schools that shouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoolyBully Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 195 Content Count: 6,754 Reputation: 844 Days Won: 3 Joined: 08/01/2000 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Am I the only one who has had zero correspondence about renewing my seats yet? I got an email last week and a package in the mail today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,612 Content Count: 74,600 Reputation: 10,857 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Did anyone pay attention to the AAC donor rankings by school in the ticket renewal packet!!! How bad does that look for USF? I’ve done my part for 16 years and will continue to donate. People need to step up or for sure we stay in this conference for ever. This marvelously astute guy did .... Lastly, if you're wondering why they're doing this, go to the chart on page 6-7 of this brochure: http://d81ldo19jx3e0.cloudfront.net/usf/bullschampionshipseating/assets/img/BC-Guide.pdf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoolyBully Posted March 17, 2015 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 195 Content Count: 6,754 Reputation: 844 Days Won: 3 Joined: 08/01/2000 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Did anyone pay attention to the AAC donor rankings by school in the ticket renewal packet!!! How bad does that look for USF? I’ve done my part for 16 years and will continue to donate. People need to step up or for sure we stay in this conference for ever. This marvelously astute guy did .... Lastly, if you're wondering why they're doing this, go to the chart on page 6-7 of this brochure: http://d81ldo19jx3e0.cloudfront.net/usf/bullschampionshipseating/assets/img/BC-Guide.pdf Just playing around, it's interesting to note the dollar-per-donor ratio, where Tulane averages 'bout $794/donor and at the other end of the scale Memphis averages about $2,446/donor. USF looks to be right at $1,096. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now