usfbullrider Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 3,222 Reputation: 387 Days Won: 8 Joined: 07/30/2011 Share Posted December 21, 2014 his hudl states he was the fastest lineman at several camps including ours, uf, bama. that's always a plus. I'm glad we are solidifying the line because I haven't been impressed with the backups at all yet. zack hudson should be healthy for next year too, was originally a mizzou commit. That's 3 (hudson, gibbons, bethel)really good lineman right there with some name cache who could are div 1 ready. I think hopefully some of these other guys pay off like marcus norman, galati (played for joe kinnan, knows that offense), Jerimi hall, Benjamin Knox(originally a UF commit) pay off. We need more lineman really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulls phanatic Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 36 Content Count: 2,114 Reputation: 160 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/20/2010 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2014 Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford I don't think not playing a down is the driver. Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started. Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver. I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPR Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,042 Reputation: 279 Days Won: 10 Joined: 03/09/2010 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford I don't think not playing a down is the driver. Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started. Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver. I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact. It's already been stated multiple times by credible sources that he's eligible. Bethel is a great get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dausfbulls11 Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 320 Content Count: 3,030 Reputation: 670 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/15/2005 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Gibbons never even enrolled at stanford is what i heard, not sure though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Does anyone have a link to his officially being eligible next year? I've seen nothing but speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCNO04 Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 1 Content Count: 34 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/08/2013 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford I don't think not playing a down is the driver. Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started. Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver. I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact. It's already been stated multiple times by credible sources that he's eligible. Bethel is a great get. I've heard the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfvictor Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 761 Reputation: 45 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/09/2011 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Does anyone have a link to his officially being eligible next year? I've seen nothing but speculation. This is what i recall as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2014 Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford I don't think not playing a down is the driver. Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started. Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver. I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact. It's already been stated multiple times by credible sources that he's eligible. Bethel is a great get. I'm not as confident, till I hear it from USF. Even the beat writers say they aren't sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls1181 Posted December 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 170 Content Count: 5,722 Reputation: 366 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/03/2011 Share Posted December 21, 2014 http://www.hudl.com/athlete/2799009/highlights/73625402 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now