OT Glen Bethel commits

[JupiterBull]

 

Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford

I don't think not playing a down is the driver.  Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started.  Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver.

 

I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact.

 

Just curious...I get a negative vote because I opine as to his eligibility?  Odd duck, whoever was offended by that.

[CPR]

 

 

Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford

I don't think not playing a down is the driver.  Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started.  Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver.

 

I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact.

 

Just curious...I get a negative vote because I opine as to his eligibility?  Odd duck, whoever was offended by that.

 

Yea, people are petty here sometimes.

[Triple B]

 

 

Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford

I don't think not playing a down is the driver.  Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started.  Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver.

 

I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact.

 

Just curious...I get a negative vote because I opine as to his eligibility?  Odd duck, whoever was offended by that.

 

 

Odd duck, indeed .... maybe it was a mistake.

[JupiterBull]

 

 

 

Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford

I don't think not playing a down is the driver.  Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started.  Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver.

 

I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact.

 

Just curious...I get a negative vote because I opine as to his eligibility?  Odd duck, whoever was offended by that.

 

 

Odd duck, indeed .... maybe it was a mistake.

 

I suppose.  Either way, looking forward to what changes lie ahead, both in personnel & schemes.

[CPR]

 

 

 

 

Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford

I don't think not playing a down is the driver.  Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started.  Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver.

 

I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact.

 

Just curious...I get a negative vote because I opine as to his eligibility?  Odd duck, whoever was offended by that.

 

 

Odd duck, indeed .... maybe it was a mistake.

 

I suppose.  Either way, looking forward to what changes lie ahead, both in personnel & schemes.

 

 

I evened it out and gave you an upvote man. I think he'll be eligble, but I guess the facts are, no one knows if he'll be suiting up next year.

Edited December 22, 2014 by CPR

[JupiterBull]

 

 

 

 

 

Gibbons should be eligible. He didn't play a down for Stanford

I don't think not playing a down is the driver.  Seems it's more about if he was on the team when the season started.  Someone noted that he won't have to sit out, as he wants to be closer to family, but as most know, that's not enough to get a waiver.

 

I'm hopeful he can play right away, but he's still 19 or so, so we can't expect him to be a day 1 starter. But, his rankings give some hope for early impact.

 

Just curious...I get a negative vote because I opine as to his eligibility?  Odd duck, whoever was offended by that.

 

 

Odd duck, indeed .... maybe it was a mistake.

 

I suppose.  Either way, looking forward to what changes lie ahead, both in personnel & schemes.

 

 

I evened it out and gave you an upvote man. I think he'll be eligble, but I guess the facts are, no one knows if he'll be suiting up next year.

 

Thanks...many are asking Knight & Odom to keep us posted, so I suspect we'll hear pretty soon.  If he's enrolling for January, we'll surely want to know if he's cleared for 2015.  But, the NCAA wheels often move slowly.