Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Slowest offense in Division 1


Recommended Posts

But..... the slower the pace + the less plays you have on offense in a game = the more opportunities you have to score right? 

 

This offense is not predicated around "opportunities to score."  It's designed to be methodical, control the ball, control the time of possession, and prevent the hurry-up opponents from running 100 plays on our defense.  The offense is not executing the offense correctly.

 

However, on timing, for the first few games, we were actually quite a bit faster... because the OC was calling all of the plays.  After NC State, CWT decided he needed to get more involved.   When you watch the game live, you can tell when CWT is changing the play... because White/Bench spend more time looking at the signals - and we start running out of time on the play clock.

 

Delays of game are 100% to blame on CWT butting in on the OC's playcalling.  (OC calls quickly, meaning we line up with 20+ seconds left... CWT does not, and we line up with 10 seconds or less remaining -- add up those 15 or seconds over a drive and you can see why we've slowed down so much)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  300
  • Content Count:  7,993
  • Reputation:   968
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  10/31/2005

So you're in favor of a faster paced 3 and out?

Of course that assumes that we would perform the same with a faster pace. Might perform better. Might perform worse (no seriously).

If we're going to go 3 and out, yes I am in favor of it being faster than slower. We'd get the ball back with less time wasted.

More possessions for us equals more possessions for the other team too. Given our defensive performance to date that seems like a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

 

 

So you're in favor of a faster paced 3 and out?

Of course that assumes that we would perform the same with a faster pace. Might perform better. Might perform worse (no seriously).

If we're going to go 3 and out, yes I am in favor of it being faster than slower. We'd get the ball back with less time wasted.

More possessions for us equals more possessions for the other team too. Given our defensive performance to date that seems like a bad idea.

 

I'm not sure what's worse, giving their offense more time on the field or ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

 

So you're in favor of a faster paced 3 and out?

Of course that assumes that we would perform the same with a faster pace. Might perform better. Might perform worse (no seriously).

 

If we're going to go 3 and out, yes I am in favor of it being faster than slower. We'd get the ball back with less time wasted.

 

 

Uhhh, no ... have you seen our defense lately?  An extra possession or two for the other team achieved by us going 3 and out faster would be disastrous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  18
  • Content Count:  8,878
  • Reputation:   1,266
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  07/12/2013

 

 

So you're in favor of a faster paced 3 and out?

Of course that assumes that we would perform the same with a faster pace. Might perform better. Might perform worse (no seriously).

If we're going to go 3 and out, yes I am in favor of it being faster than slower. We'd get the ball back with less time wasted.

Uhhh, no ... have you seen our defense lately?  An extra possession or two for the other team achieved by us going 3 and out faster would be disastrous. 

Our poor D barely has time to get their helmets off and suck some O2 as it is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

 

But..... the slower the pace + the less plays you have on offense in a game = the more opportunities you have to score right? 

 

This offense is not predicated around "opportunities to score."  It's designed to be methodical, control the ball, control the time of possession, and prevent the hurry-up opponents from running 100 plays on our defense.  The offense is not executing the offense correctly.

 

However, on timing, for the first few games, we were actually quite a bit faster... because the OC was calling all of the plays.  After NC State, CWT decided he needed to get more involved.   When you watch the game live, you can tell when CWT is changing the play... because White/Bench spend more time looking at the signals - and we start running out of time on the play clock.

 

Delays of game are 100% to blame on CWT butting in on the OC's playcalling.  (OC calls quickly, meaning we line up with 20+ seconds left... CWT does not, and we line up with 10 seconds or less remaining -- add up those 15 or seconds over a drive and you can see why we've slowed down so much)

 

 

This is 100% correct.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  554
  • Content Count:  14,408
  • Reputation:   438
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  07/25/2008

USF has a Penn ST transfer qb from the days of Joe Pa. It may be just as much about not being able to develop a qb as not having one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  22
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

USF has a Penn ST transfer qb from the days of Joe Pa. It may be just as much about not being able to develop a qb as not having one.

Bench was signed by Bill obrien. Not before. and he was asked to leave soon after

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

 

USF has a Penn ST transfer qb from the days of Joe Pa. It may be just as much about not being able to develop a qb as not having one.

Bench was signed by Bill obrien. Not before. and he was asked to leave soon after

 

Who asked him to leave? This is the first time I've heard Bench was kicked off the team.

Edited by JTrue
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  56
  • Content Count:  4,425
  • Reputation:   710
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  03/16/2013

Being slow would be fine, if we were more accurate.

 

 

 

I don't see us improving any further this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.