Anchor Down?

[Who'sYourData?]

What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand?

 

Let's see.  The SEC Network is brand new and this was the first game ever broadcast.  You don't think someone made a mistake and then corrected it?  

 

Or is there some rule in the universe that once you have started watching a game the provider must let you finish the game even if you don't have rights to it?

[slick1ru2]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

 

 

My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ...

 

 

I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April.  

 

 

No offense but .......  

 

It was from April per the SEC Network Now TV show.

 

And ShadowBull, who do you think owns the SEC Network? Its an ESPN network devoted to the SEC. And I have WatchESPN AND SEC Network access through Dish, and the game has been PULLED.

Edited August 29, 2014 by slick1ru2

[Who'sYourData?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

 

 

My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ...

 

 

I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April.  

 

 

No offense but .......  

 

 

Um, from somewhere other than this thread, if that's what you are thinking.

[slick1ru2]

Watching this game on the TV replay and the announcers are making excuses for Vandy because of the weather delay, smh.

[Who'sYourData?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

 

 

My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ...

 

 

I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April.  

 

 

No offense but .......  

 

It was from April per the SEC Network Now TV show.

 

And ShadowBull, who do you think owns the SEC Network? Its an ESPN network devoted to the SEC. And I have WatchESPN AND SEC Network access through Dish, and the game has been PULLED.

 

 

The SEC owns the SEC Network, they have a contract with ESPN to produce it.

 

The game was PULLED because you were not supposed to have access.  How difficult is this to understand?

[CPR]

Watching this game on the TV replay and the announcers are making excuses for Vandy because of the weather delay, smh.

 

Well, it is the SEC Network, so I'm guessing they are going to be homers on that channel.

[slick1ru2]

The SEC Network, being owned by ESPN...

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/sec/2014/05/31/sec-network-espn-comcast-direct-tv/9812745/

[slick1ru2]

I have the SEC Network, I have access to their replays. It's been pulled and the AAC is looking into it.

[charsibb]

You da man, slick

[slick1ru2]

The Texas AM/ South Carolina  SkyCam Feed is available on WatchESPN with an SEC/ESPN Network Logo. BTW, the SkyCam feed for the Boise St/Miss game is available too. Guess we'll see what happens when the AAC contacts them. Pulling losses to non-P5 needs to be nipped in the bud.

Edited August 29, 2014 by slick1ru2