Anchor Down?

[slick1ru2]

I just tweeted it it being pulled to the AAC Asst Commish of digital media.

[cmhatter]

i'm so glad there is a penalty for this

 

if there wasnt...

 

we'd bea wearing "The Team" on our backs. What an embarrassment that'd be. Probably 500 better options.

[slick1ru2]

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Edited August 29, 2014 by slick1ru2

[Cow Pie]

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

[Who'sYourData?]

Un-frackin-beLIEVable!

 

I was JUST now watching the replay on ESPN3, stepped outside to take the trash out to the truck as they were driving by, come back, and...

 

ESPN PULLED THE GAME FROM THE REPLAY LIST

 

My screen had nothing but an error page, when I reloaded the page, I got nothing but the SEC splash screen. Here's the link for proof.

 

http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/id/1973105/size/condensed/

 

It's as if the game never happened. WTF ESPN??????

 

Apparently the SEC Network has rights to this game.

[slick1ru2]

Un-frackin-beLIEVable!

 

I was JUST now watching the replay on ESPN3, stepped outside to take the trash out to the truck as they were driving by, come back, and...

 

ESPN PULLED THE GAME FROM THE REPLAY LIST

 

My screen had nothing but an error page, when I reloaded the page, I got nothing but the SEC splash screen. Here's the link for proof.

 

http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/id/1973105/size/condensed/

 

It's as if the game never happened. WTF ESPN??????

 

Apparently the SEC Network has rights to this game.

So does Temple.

[slick1ru2]

And I Tweeted it being pulled to Mark Hodgkin and he said the AAC will check into it.

[charsibb]

 

Un-frackin-beLIEVable!

 

I was JUST now watching the replay on ESPN3, stepped outside to take the trash out to the truck as they were driving by, come back, and...

 

ESPN PULLED THE GAME FROM THE REPLAY LIST

 

My screen had nothing but an error page, when I reloaded the page, I got nothing but the SEC splash screen. Here's the link for proof.

 

http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/id/1973105/size/condensed/

 

It's as if the game never happened. WTF ESPN??????

 

Apparently the SEC Network has rights to this game.

 

 

Like I said, I was in the middle of watching it when it got pulled. I saw Temple's first drive, then an error screen.

 

This isn't about TV rights, it's about embarassment!

 

I'm angry!

 

Thanks slick, for getting the word out.

[slick1ru2]

If you watch SEC Network, it's copyrighted ESPN. I included all the major sports news outlets when I tweeted the game was pulled. Maybe someone will pick it up.

[Triple B]

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?