Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Un-frackin-beLIEVable! I was JUST now watching the replay on ESPN3, stepped outside to take the trash out to the truck as they were driving by, come back, and... ESPN PULLED THE GAME FROM THE REPLAY LIST My screen had nothing but an error page, when I reloaded the page, I got nothing but the SEC splash screen. Here's the link for proof. http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/id/1973105/size/condensed/ It's as if the game never happened. WTF ESPN?????? Apparently the SEC Network has rights to this game. Like I said, I was in the middle of watching it when it got pulled. I saw Temple's first drive, then an error screen. This isn't about TV rights, it's about embarassment! I'm angry! Thanks slick, for getting the word out. Um, it is about TV rights. If you go to WatchESPN for this game right now it says this is an SEC Network game. I'm really at a loss trying to figure out what you are so upset about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 If you watch SEC Network, it's copyrighted ESPN. I included all the major sports news outlets when I tweeted the game was pulled. Maybe someone will pick it up. Just because ESPN produced the game does not mean they have broadcast rights on all platforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted August 29, 2014 WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 http://www.gatorzone.com/listings/sec-network-faq I am an authenticated WatchESPN app user, will I be able to see SEC Network content through that app? SEC Network will be available through the WatchESPN app for cable, satellite or teleco providers with authenticated SEC Network access. Visit www.getsecnetwork.com for more information and to alert your provider of your interest in SEC Network content. http://www.getsecnetwork.com/Default.asp?u=vanderbilt BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS OFFERS THE SEC NETWORK ON CHANNEL 54 AND 1150 HD, OR ON THE ALTERNATE CHANNEL 530 OR 1191. Bright House Networks subscribers are currently not able to access the SEC Network or SEC Network + on WatchESPN. Contact Bright House Networks for more information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ... I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted August 29, 2014 WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ... I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April. No offense but ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted August 29, 2014 What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted August 29, 2014 What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand? I understood all that, why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted August 29, 2014 What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand? I understood all that, why? Was responding to Shadow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now