Dog & the tree

[Joe]

to show how much that site knows the AAC is actually a better conference this year then the big east. And with the logic they gave then Donnie Jones should be on the list as well.

Keep smokin Johnny!! I recommend you move on to mescaline or the horse with no name.

The AAC is better.

Don't know how you can say that with a straight face. Their WORST team is better than anyone in our bottom HALF.

Same link as previous post

RPI Rk American Athletic Conf All RPI SOS Rk SOS

13 Cincinnati 11-1 22-3 0.6380 72 0.5544

31 Connecticut 7-4 19-5 0.6081 76 0.5526

32 Memphis 8-3 18-5 0.6075 64 0.5592

34 Louisville 8-2 19-4 0.6052 86 0.5435

38 South. Methodist 8-3 19-5 0.5991 111 0.5257

149 South Florida 3-9 12-13 0.5120 100 0.5357

177 Temple 1-9 6-16 0.4960 42 0.5687

179 Houston 4-7 12-12 0.4945 137 0.5090

195 Rutgers 4-7 9-14 0.4826 91 0.5412

212 UCF 1-10 7-13 0.4738 98 0.5371

RPI Rk Big East Conf All RPI SOS Rk SOS

5 Villanova 10-1 22-2 0.6630 24 0.5799

11 Creighton 10-2 20-4 0.6417 30 0.5745

41 Xavier 7-4 17-7 0.5959 40 0.5689

54 Georgetown 6-5 15-8 0.5820 23 0.5802

55 Providence 6-6 16-9 0.5806 47 0.5670

57 St. John's 6-6 16-9 0.5789 33 0.5724

76 Marquette 6-5 14-10 0.5577 75 0.5531

119 DePaul 2-10 10-15 0.5279 15 0.5862

128 Butler 2-11 11-13 0.5221 67 0.5553

145 Seton Hall 4-8 13-12 0.5149 104 0.5321

I should say the top of the AAC > Big East

[smazza]

our team is embarrassingly bad but we have a lot of talent coming in next year

 

i hear heath is signed thru 2018

 

sit back and enjoy

[usfgrad84]

It's so easy to just look at the final results at the end of the year and look in the rear view mirror and say how horrible Heath's record was. Funny how no one seems to remember the complete disaster that he took over. Yeah, it is year seven, but to get this thing moving in the direction he brought in a lot of transfers and JUCOs early. By doing that he created an up and down see-saw. That resulted in a 20 win season and then another dropoff then another down year and then an NCAA year then a dropoff. between last year and this year's recruiting classes these are first years he is actually building this thing from a foundation with young players with even better younger players coming in behind them.

If he built this thing with freshmen when he first got here, #1 he would not have been able to recruit this quality of recruit and #2 he would have been gone after year 3. No way this program would have won 20 games his 3rd year and we would still be floundering with no recent success under our belt to work with.

Nice to think otherwise, but trying to build this thing any other way, from where we were when he got here is a fantasy. Mccullum created a mess of mass proportions.

Looking back on the real history of this program I would like to know what could have been differently. No, you were not bringing in Huggins who would have been one and done anyway.

[Sellular1]

It's so easy to just look at the final results at the end of the year and look in the rear view mirror and say how horrible Heath's record was. Funny how no one seems to remember the complete disaster that he took over. Yeah, it is year seven, but to get this thing moving in the direction he brought in a lot of transfers and JUCOs early. By doing that he created an up and down see-saw. That resulted in a 20 win season and then another dropoff then another down year and then an NCAA year then a dropoff. between last year and this year's recruiting classes these are first years he is actually building this thing from a foundation with young players with even better younger players coming in behind them.

If he built this thing with freshmen when he first got here, #1 he would not have been able to recruit this quality of recruit and #2 he would have been gone after year 3. No way this program would have won 20 games his 3rd year and we would still be floundering with no recent success under our belt to work with.

Nice to think otherwise, but trying to build this thing any other way, from where we were when he got here is a fantasy. Mccullum created a mess of mass proportions.

Looking back on the real history of this program I would like to know what could have been differently. No, you were not bringing in Huggins who would have been one and done anyway.

If CSH was running a company, he would be fired.

[Bulls 1]

Use the money we got from the big east and let's get a real BB coach and AD

[charsibb]

It's so easy to just look at the final results at the end of the year and look in the rear view mirror and say how horrible Heath's record was. Funny how no one seems to remember the complete disaster that he took over. Yeah, it is year seven, but to get this thing moving in the direction he brought in a lot of transfers and JUCOs early. By doing that he created an up and down see-saw. That resulted in a 20 win season and then another dropoff then another down year and then an NCAA year then a dropoff. between last year and this year's recruiting classes these are first years he is actually building this thing from a foundation with young players with even better younger players coming in behind them.

If he built this thing with freshmen when he first got here, #1 he would not have been able to recruit this quality of recruit and #2 he would have been gone after year 3. No way this program would have won 20 games his 3rd year and we would still be floundering with no recent success under our belt to work with.

Nice to think otherwise, but trying to build this thing any other way, from where we were when he got here is a fantasy. Mccullum created a mess of mass proportions.

Looking back on the real history of this program I would like to know what could have been differently. No, you were not bringing in Huggins who would have been one and done anyway.

If CSH was running a company, he would be fired.

Maybe not. If he had supporters like Doug and Judy on the board...

[DELdaBull]

Boatwright for UConn just scored his 1000th point for them. He is #48 in UConn history.

 

USF has 17 total.

Edited February 15, 2014 by DELdaBull

[Sellular1]

It's so easy to just look at the final results at the end of the year and look in the rear view mirror and say how horrible Heath's record was. Funny how no one seems to remember the complete disaster that he took over. Yeah, it is year seven, but to get this thing moving in the direction he brought in a lot of transfers and JUCOs early. By doing that he created an up and down see-saw. That resulted in a 20 win season and then another dropoff then another down year and then an NCAA year then a dropoff. between last year and this year's recruiting classes these are first years he is actually building this thing from a foundation with young players with even better younger players coming in behind them.If he built this thing with freshmen when he first got here, #1 he would not have been able to recruit this quality of recruit and #2 he would have been gone after year 3. No way this program would have won 20 games his 3rd year and we would still be floundering with no recent success under our belt to work with.Nice to think otherwise, but trying to build this thing any other way, from where we were when he got here is a fantasy. Mccullum created a mess of mass proportions.Looking back on the real history of this program I would like to know what could have been differently. No, you were not bringing in Huggins who would have been one and done anyway.

If CSH was running a company, he would be fired.

Maybe not. If he had supporters like Doug and Judy on the board...

Probably not if the board members were selected by shareholders.....

[Mike Stuben]

It's so easy to just look at the final results at the end of the year and look in the rear view mirror and say how horrible Heath's record was. Funny how no one seems to remember the complete disaster that he took over. Yeah, it is year seven, but to get this thing moving in the direction he brought in a lot of transfers and JUCOs early. By doing that he created an up and down see-saw. That resulted in a 20 win season and then another dropoff then another down year and then an NCAA year then a dropoff. between last year and this year's recruiting classes these are first years he is actually building this thing from a foundation with young players with even better younger players coming in behind them.

If he built this thing with freshmen when he first got here, #1 he would not have been able to recruit this quality of recruit and #2 he would have been gone after year 3. No way this program would have won 20 games his 3rd year and we would still be floundering with no recent success under our belt to work with.

Nice to think otherwise, but trying to build this thing any other way, from where we were when he got here is a fantasy. Mccullum created a mess of mass proportions.

Looking back on the real history of this program I would like to know what could have been differently. No, you were not bringing in Huggins who would have been one and done anyway.

 

 

For the record, I like coach Heath and think he should be in no danger of losing his job this off season (unless NCAA issues become major). But, I want to be fair to Coach McCollum too, he left the new staff a pretty good played named Dominique Jones. When I look at popular opinion versus what I think, one of the biggest differences is evaluating Coach McCullum. He did some good things for USF.

[Who'sYourData?]

Good read in Voodoofive

 

http://www.voodoofive.com/2014/2/13/5408822/dog-and-tree-ii

 

We should be beyond this performance with Heath. 

 

Delusion and idiocy.  The program is in far better shape than when Heath got here.  To get from where USF was to a consistent NCAA team takes years and lots of work.  We are headed in the right direction.  The worst thing USF could do right now is replace CSH.  Only an impatient fool would consider such an action.