dabulls34 Posted October 21, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 242 Reputation: 4 Days Won: 1 Joined: 03/27/2012 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Anyone saying Boyd is better/will be better than Bortles is absolutely kidding themselves Out of curiosity, who's your top 5? As far as who I think will translate well at the next level- 1. Teddy 2. Winston 3. Hogan 4. Mettenberger 5. Bortles With Hackenberger, manziel and Mariota being very close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabulls34 Posted October 21, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 242 Reputation: 4 Days Won: 1 Joined: 03/27/2012 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Mariota is so overrated. He fits the scheme perfect, but you put him at UCF and they aren't the same team. Same reason he won't be successful on Sundays. UCF has zero talent and he makes NFL throw after NFL throw. Even if he isn't "top 5", hes no doubt top 10. And no to McCarron or Murray. Its easy to throw to NFL WRs every weekend Won't McCarron and Murray be doing that at the next level anyway? Not sure how you're using that as an argument. So let's see, you asked for 5 QBs better, you were given 7, even if you take away the three you did using the dubious arguments you made, I can throw in Tajh Boyd in there and you still have 5. I'm sure you'll come up additional subjectively-supported reasons to "debunk" those too, though. Yeah but the every corner in the NFL is much better and they won't be able to just put it up and let their guys out play the secondary on a consistent basis. The exact reason most successful NFL QBs dont come from traditional powerhouse programs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Like Brady, Manning, Rodgers, Wilson, Locker, Stafford, Luck, Bradford, Pryor...dude, 75% of the starting QBs in the league are from P5 conferences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Mariota is so overrated. He fits the scheme perfect, but you put him at UCF and they aren't the same team. Same reason he won't be successful on Sundays. UCF has zero talent and he makes NFL throw after NFL throw. Even if he isn't "top 5", hes no doubt top 10. And no to McCarron or Murray. Its easy to throw to NFL WRs every weekend Won't McCarron and Murray be doing that at the next level anyway? Not sure how you're using that as an argument. So let's see, you asked for 5 QBs better, you were given 7, even if you take away the three you did using the dubious arguments you made, I can throw in Tajh Boyd in there and you still have 5. I'm sure you'll come up additional subjectively-supported reasons to "debunk" those too, though. Yeah but the every corner in the NFL is much better and they won't be able to just put it up and let their guys out play the secondary on a consistent basis. The exact reason most successful NFL QBs dont come from traditional powerhouse programs The goalposts are moving ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theman123 Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 411 Content Count: 5,591 Reputation: 204 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/10/2006 Share Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) Mariota is so overrated. He fits the scheme perfect, but you put him at UCF and they aren't the same team. Same reason he won't be successful on Sundays. UCF has zero talent and he makes NFL throw after NFL throw. Even if he isn't "top 5", hes no doubt top 10. And no to McCarron or Murray. Its easy to throw to NFL WRs every weekend Won't McCarron and Murray be doing that at the next level anyway? Not sure how you're using that as an argument. So let's see, you asked for 5 QBs better, you were given 7, even if you take away the three you did using the dubious arguments you made, I can throw in Tajh Boyd in there and you still have 5. I'm sure you'll come up additional subjectively-supported reasons to "debunk" those too, though. Yeah but the every corner in the NFL is much better and they won't be able to just put it up and let their guys out play the secondary on a consistent basis. The exact reason most successful NFL QBs dont come from traditional powerhouse programs lol, most successful NFL QBs? Colin Kaepernick, Tony Romo, Ben Roethlisberger and Andy Dalton are the only starting QBs who came from non-P5 conferences. Edited October 22, 2013 by theman123 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,669 Reputation: 10,888 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Mariota is so overrated. He fits the scheme perfect, but you put him at UCF and they aren't the same team. Same reason he won't be successful on Sundays. UCF has zero talent and he makes NFL throw after NFL throw. Even if he isn't "top 5", hes no doubt top 10. And no to McCarron or Murray. Its easy to throw to NFL WRs every weekend Won't McCarron and Murray be doing that at the next level anyway? Not sure how you're using that as an argument. So let's see, you asked for 5 QBs better, you were given 7, even if you take away the three you did using the dubious arguments you made, I can throw in Tajh Boyd in there and you still have 5. I'm sure you'll come up additional subjectively-supported reasons to "debunk" those too, though. Yeah but the every corner in the NFL is much better and they won't be able to just put it up and let their guys out play the secondary on a consistent basis. The exact reason most successful NFL QBs dont come from traditional powerhouse programs lol, most successful NFL QBs? Colin Kaepernick, Tony Romo, Ben Roethlisberger and Andy Dalton are the only starting QBs who came from non-P5 conferences. In all fairness, Mr Bortles did say they didn't come from traditional powerhouse programs rather than didnt come from P-5 conferences .... don't know if that changes things much but there is a definite difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Mariota is so overrated. He fits the scheme perfect, but you put him at UCF and they aren't the same team. Same reason he won't be successful on Sundays. UCF has zero talent and he makes NFL throw after NFL throw. Even if he isn't "top 5", hes no doubt top 10. And no to McCarron or Murray. Its easy to throw to NFL WRs every weekend Won't McCarron and Murray be doing that at the next level anyway? Not sure how you're using that as an argument. So let's see, you asked for 5 QBs better, you were given 7, even if you take away the three you did using the dubious arguments you made, I can throw in Tajh Boyd in there and you still have 5. I'm sure you'll come up additional subjectively-supported reasons to "debunk" those too, though. Yeah but the every corner in the NFL is much better and they won't be able to just put it up and let their guys out play the secondary on a consistent basis. The exact reason most successful NFL QBs dont come from traditional powerhouse programs lol, most successful NFL QBs? Colin Kaepernick, Tony Romo, Ben Roethlisberger and Andy Dalton are the only starting QBs who came from non-P5 conferences. In all fairness, Mr Bortles did say they didn't come from traditional powerhouse programs rather than didnt come from P-5 conferences .... don't know if that changes things much but there is a definite difference. Huge difference, as usual your insight is riveting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabulls34 Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 242 Reputation: 4 Days Won: 1 Joined: 03/27/2012 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Mariota is so overrated. He fits the scheme perfect, but you put him at UCF and they aren't the same team. Same reason he won't be successful on Sundays. UCF has zero talent and he makes NFL throw after NFL throw. Even if he isn't "top 5", hes no doubt top 10. And no to McCarron or Murray. Its easy to throw to NFL WRs every weekend Won't McCarron and Murray be doing that at the next level anyway? Not sure how you're using that as an argument. So let's see, you asked for 5 QBs better, you were given 7, even if you take away the three you did using the dubious arguments you made, I can throw in Tajh Boyd in there and you still have 5. I'm sure you'll come up additional subjectively-supported reasons to "debunk" those too, though. Yeah but the every corner in the NFL is much better and they won't be able to just put it up and let their guys out play the secondary on a consistent basis. The exact reason most successful NFL QBs dont come from traditional powerhouse programs lol, most successful NFL QBs? Colin Kaepernick, Tony Romo, Ben Roethlisberger and Andy Dalton are the only starting QBs who came from non-P5 conferences. In all fairness, Mr Bortles did say they didn't come from traditional powerhouse programs rather than didnt come from P-5 conferences .... don't know if that changes things much but there is a definite difference. That was my point. And a lot of NFL scouts have the same opinion. I have watched a lot of film on bortles, Murray, teddy, mettenberger, mccarron and there is no way Murray or mccarron go before bortles if he decides to come out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deters- Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 67 Content Count: 3,749 Reputation: 309 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/22/2008 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Anyone saying Boyd is better/will be better than Bortles is absolutely kidding themselves Out of curiosity, who's your top 5? As far as who I think will translate well at the next level- 1. Teddy 2. Winston 3. Hogan 4. Mettenberger 5. Bortles With Hackenberger, manziel and Mariota being very close. I don't think Teddy is that good at the next level TBH. I would have no reservations taking Winston or Hackenberg with a Top 5 pick. 1. Winston 2. Hackenberg 3. Mariota 4. Hogan 5. Manziel/Bortles/ Teddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 22, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,669 Reputation: 10,888 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Anyone saying Boyd is better/will be better than Bortles is absolutely kidding themselves Out of curiosity, who's your top 5? As far as who I think will translate well at the next level- 1. Teddy 2. Winston 3. Hogan 4. Mettenberger 5. Bortles With Hackenberger, manziel and Mariota being very close. I don't think Teddy is that good at the next level TBH. I would have no reservations taking Winston or Hackenberg with a Top 5 pick. 1. Winston 2. Hackenberg 3. Mariota 4. Hogan 5. Manziel/Bortles/ Teddy I think the original assertion was about a top 5 qb picking us apart. Nothing about how they'd be at the next level. Is the list for the top 5 college qbs the same as the list for the top 5 who would have the most success at the next level? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now