Paisa el Toro Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Now that we're getting into the season, its becoming painfully obvious why guys like Dyer, Trickett, and Mitchell didn't transfer in and guys like Griffin and D'Vo jumped ship. Call me dense, but why is it painfully obvious? Did they all predict we would be this bad? Did they not like the offensive scheme being instituted by Taggart? What do you speculate as being "painfully obvious" before the season started? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Now that we're getting into the season, its becoming painfully obvious why guys like Dyer, Trickett, and Mitchell didn't transfer in and guys like Griffin and D'Vo jumped ship. Call me dense, but why is it painfully obvious? Did they all predict we would be this bad? Did they not like the offensive scheme being instituted by Taggart? What do you speculate as being "painfully obvious" before the season started? It's painfully obvious because it fits his opinion of the situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 18, 2013 (edited) Well, considering 2 of our top 3 receivers decided sitting out a year (with the prize being Iowa State afterwards) or playing at LA Tech was better than this situation, I'd say thats a strong indicator. Dyer had the option of being the workhorse for a coach that runs a system designed for a back just like him and chose to be the #2 at Louisville. Clint Trickett could have walked into the greatest QB situation in the country for playing time and picked being the #3 elsewhere. Mitchell, who knows? Its seems we didn't even bother trying to get him. Whats your take on it? Edited September 18, 2013 by JTrue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Trickett gew up in WV and wanted to go back Dyer wanted to stay near his baby mama and kid in Arkansas TRex was trying to get away from legal trouble that plagued him here. Griffin could tranfer with no penalty,, left to play with a Coach who he knew would make him no. 1 in his scheme D'Vo I don't know the details on but he had never really risn up depth Chart here. It ain't "painfully obvious" that anybody predicted this cave in. You certainly didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Well, considering 2 of our top 3 receivers decided sitting out a year (with the prize being Iowa State afterwards) or playing at LA Tech was better than this situation, I'd say thats a strong indicator. Dyer had the option of being the workhorse for a coach that runs a system designed for a back just like him and chose to be the #2 at Louisville. Clint Trickett could have walked into the greatest QB situation in the country for playing time and picked being the #3 elsewhere. Mitchell, who knows? Its seems we didn't even bother trying to get him. Whats your take on it? My opinion is we don't know unless they come out a say anything. I'm generally not one to speculate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Well, considering 2 of our top 3 receivers decided sitting out a year (with the prize being Iowa State afterwards) or playing at LA Tech was better than this situation, I'd say thats a strong indicator. Dyer had the option of being the workhorse for a coach that runs a system designed for a back just like him and chose to be the #2 at Louisville. Clint Trickett could have walked into the greatest QB situation in the country for playing time and picked being the #3 elsewhere. Mitchell, who knows? Its seems we didn't even bother trying to get him. Whats your take on it? I firmly believe Trickett thought he'd start at WVU, and he preferred that over starting at USF. He saw the other 2 QBs, and likely loved his chances. He got a whiff in Game 1, and now seems seated at #3. It's a LONG season, and WVU will likely get pummelled and finish near .500, so he'll surely get more ops to play, and could still win the starting job. But if this freshman QB plays well, he may be quiet the his final 2 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPR Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,042 Reputation: 279 Days Won: 10 Joined: 03/09/2010 Share Posted September 18, 2013 I heard Trickett chose WVU because he knew he wasn't going to the NFL, wanted to go back home and ultimately end up coaching there if given the opportunity. Looking more towards his future in the B12, compared to starting for a 4-8 team in the AAC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Well, considering 2 of our top 3 receivers decided sitting out a year (with the prize being Iowa State afterwards) or playing at LA Tech was better than this situation, I'd say thats a strong indicator. Dyer had the option of being the workhorse for a coach that runs a system designed for a back just like him and chose to be the #2 at Louisville. Clint Trickett could have walked into the greatest QB situation in the country for playing time and picked being the #3 elsewhere. Mitchell, who knows? Its seems we didn't even bother trying to get him. Whats your take on it? My opinion is we don't know unless they come out a say anything. I'm generally not one to speculate. Isn't 99% of this board speculation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Well, considering 2 of our top 3 receivers decided sitting out a year (with the prize being Iowa State afterwards) or playing at LA Tech was better than this situation, I'd say thats a strong indicator. Dyer had the option of being the workhorse for a coach that runs a system designed for a back just like him and chose to be the #2 at Louisville. Clint Trickett could have walked into the greatest QB situation in the country for playing time and picked being the #3 elsewhere. Mitchell, who knows? Its seems we didn't even bother trying to get him. Whats your take on it? USF's WR's didn't transfer until after either Trickett, Dyer, or even Mitchell selected their respective schools. I don't think anyone could have predicted that being on or watching USF would have been this painful at this point in the season. Trickett transferred to WVU because he's from the area, I think. Dyer wanted to contend for something before bolting to the NFL. Montgomery and Griffin maybe didn't jive with Taggart. It's all speculation, but I doubt any of these transfers could have anticipated what's going on at USF right now to the point that it was "painfully obvious." That's what I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckparrothead Posted September 18, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 957 Reputation: 49 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/25/2011 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Pretty sure Trickett thought he had a good chance at starting in WV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now