Not Too Many Posts About our Soft Defense...........................

[DELdaBull]

Baker did pretty good at corner.

Giddins can be found on a milk carton.

QFT

I was so disheartened when I saw Rutgers was blocking him with a TE (#10)

[dabulls34]

0 pressure + soft zone coverage = Swiss cheese. We just kept getting picked apart

[GaUSFBull]

Gave him all day to throw. Beyond Grissom, the entire D-Line was horrible. Given that much time, any secondary would allow an open receiver.

It's a shame because I thought Baker played a spectacular game. And Webster never gets a ball thrown his way. I thought the D-Line would create pass rush to cover up issues at the CB position, but sadly I think our secondary has covered up terrible pass rush. If Baker were as poor as I expected we'd have given up 40 last night.

Corners played pretty well

Problem is, by the time they tackled anyone, they were beyond the first down marker.

[cmhatter]

I made a post outlining how soft the defensive line is

[BullFan98]

Swiss cheese. We cannot defend the Pass across the middle. If Rutgers did this all night with running up the middle on us they would have killed us. See a reoccurring theme here.

[Ghost]

Pregunta, why dont we run man2man coverage? Do we not have the players for it?

[swamprat]

It seemed the worse thing we could do was putting them in a 3rd and long situation. They converted those almost every time.

I think Tim Wright just caught another one across the middle.

[GaUSFBull]

Pregunta, why dont we run man2man coverage? Do we not have the players for it?

That's the only reason I can think of that we don't.

[DELdaBull]

Pregunta, why dont we run man2man coverage? Do we not have the players for it?

Cause some and cuddly is the way of this head coach.

[Mission9]

Skippy Soft D.