Outlaw Posted October 19, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,484 Reputation: 3,227 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted October 19, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Brad said: Could that have anything to do with anything other than recruiting? Anything new? Since you asked. I will answer. Could that have anything to do with anything other than recruiting? No just bad coaching and bad player development. Anything new? Our QB is out for the season and we added another loss. 1 hour ago, BullsFanInTX said: If and only if you click on "overall" rankings and not just "recruit" rankings, which I keep seeing referenced over and over again. Recruit rankings don't matter anymore. They just don't. OVERALL rankings matter (which includes all of your transfers. USF had the #32 ranked transfer class, for example in all of college football last year (and #3 transfer class in AAC behind only SMU and UCF), which heavily factored into their overall rankings. Bottom line. I don't care if Scott or whoever only has 6 high school recruits. I just don't. Stack the class with all transfers for all I care as long as we're bringing in good players. If you look strictly by transfer rankings, he did that last year. 2022 Transfer AAC Football Team Rankings In order to create the most comprehensive Team Recruiting Ranking without any notion of bias, 247Sports Team Recruiting Ranking is solely based on the 247Sports... The ranking I used account for HS recruiting, transfers, and JUCO combined. Edited October 19, 2022 by Outlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outlaw Posted October 19, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,484 Reputation: 3,227 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted October 19, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Triple B said: This is ridiculously stupid no matter where you post it. Recruiting rankings are pretty subjective to begin with and once you get out of the 20-30 range, it's a total crapshoot. Hell, our classes may really be in the 140-160 range and we're overachieving at 120 ..... Well I dont think there is 140-160 FBS teams. I looked it up it is 131. We really would be lowering the standard even more if we are going to include FCS teams and recruit lower than them. Edited October 19, 2022 by Outlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outlaw Posted October 19, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,484 Reputation: 3,227 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted October 19, 2022 2 hours ago, thekidnapper said: I don't have any proof but it definitely feels like CJS gets more commits from players outside of Florida compared to past coaches. It hasn't translated to anything worth much but still interesting that he has reach. I noticed we are getting more players from SC which makes sense because CJS is familiar with SC. We do not see as many Baymade players or the counties surrounding USF. I could be wrong but it doesn't seem that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekidnapper Posted October 19, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 6 Content Count: 540 Reputation: 144 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/01/2014 Share Posted October 19, 2022 8 minutes ago, Outlaw said: I noticed we are getting more players from SC which makes sense because CJS is familiar with SC. We do not see as many Baymade players or the counties surrounding USF. I could be wrong but it doesn't seem that way. Yeah last year we had HS recruits from MI, NC, SC, TN, and GA. This year we have commitments from a recruit in MD and AL. As for the Bay Area, I never felt like we recruited well here, at least not any of the big name recruits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outlaw Posted October 19, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,484 Reputation: 3,227 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted October 19, 2022 (edited) Just now, thekidnapper said: Yeah last year we had HS recruits from MI, NC, SC, TN, and GA. This year we have commitments from a recruit in MD and AL. As for the Bay Area, I never felt like we recruited well here, at least not any of the big name recruits. There is a lot of talent in Polk and other bordering counties to Hillsborough that we seem to not recruit well in. I thought we recruited more from Clemson areas for recruiting than Florida since CJS arrived. I thought i saw some more NC, GA, and TN but wasn't sure. I didn't type it. Edited October 19, 2022 by Outlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outlaw Posted October 19, 2022 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 12,484 Reputation: 3,227 Days Won: 25 Joined: 10/16/2017 Share Posted October 19, 2022 (edited) In our 2023 class our highest ranked player in florida is ranked the 171th best player in state. I see guys going to other teams in our conference name UCf/Cincinnati before USf in the rankings. I know rating our "subjective" but that is odd. We need to recruit Florida better. Kelley was our highest rated state recruit at 113. I think there is a lot of talent in Florida that we could use. Florida has the most players in the NFL as of last year. I havent checked since the new season started. Edited October 19, 2022 by Outlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Matrix Posted October 19, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 602 Content Count: 16,379 Reputation: 2,896 Days Won: 43 Joined: 01/04/2003 Share Posted October 19, 2022 Doesn’t matter if we had one of top recruiting classes in the nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted October 19, 2022 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,038 Reputation: 10,830 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted October 19, 2022 41 minutes ago, Outlaw said: Since you asked. I will answer. Could that have anything to do with anything other than recruiting? No just bad coaching and bad player development. Anything new? Our QB is out for the season and we added another loss Swing and a miss Swing and a miss 0-2 chief Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted October 19, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted October 19, 2022 On 10/18/2022 at 12:59 PM, zarnozdabull said: Taggart's awesome recruiting maintained hope that the program did have a future after his first two years, but CJS can't seem to generate any sort of success to look forward to. Taggart's best class was his first, with Mack, Johnson, Flowers et al. They got worse from there. I contend that Taggart's last class, which had ton of attrition, kicked off our lack of depth spiral. Strong's lack of recruiting solidified this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull94 Posted October 19, 2022 Group: Member Topic Count: 22 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2022 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Paisa el Toro said: Taggart's best class was his first, with Mack, Johnson, Flowers et al. They got worse from there. I contend that Taggart's last class, which had ton of attrition, kicked off our lack of depth spiral. Strong's lack of recruiting solidified this. I'd be willing to bet Taggart's last class had so much attrition because Strong drove them off. Same thing he did at Texas with Mack Brown's last class. It seems like Scott is recruiting similar to Holtz. south carolina, georgia, etc. problem with this is we aren't a big draw for kids from those areas. The way Taggart and leavitt recruited Tampa Bay area was to get some really good talent to stay close to home. Next coach we hire refuse to let him get on a plane to recruit. Edited October 19, 2022 by Bull94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now