BrassBulls12 Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 399 Content Count: 4,679 Reputation: 517 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/03/2017 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Why don't we wait and see what happens when we don't have as many freshmen and first time starters playing before we just assume we will go 4-8 shall we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_Bullnard_Shaw Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 55 Content Count: 6,740 Reputation: 1,743 Days Won: 17 Joined: 11/04/2012 Author Share Posted November 29, 2018 Just now, puc86 said: Yep. Since it was one of the strongest arguments for earlier than typical action it makes you wonder why someone with knowledge didn’t come forward with it before it grew into a frenzy. It’s kind of hard to put the genie back into the bottle. Once the narrative gets set, it's virtually impossible to change, especially when that narrative was a fiction we wanted to be true. That alleged buy out made it a no-brainer to get rid of them. We should have known it was too good to be true. Oh well, fool me once... I guess I better learn to love boring close wins against teams we out talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usf97 Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 179 Content Count: 3,647 Reputation: 456 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/01/2005 Share Posted November 29, 2018 19 minutes ago, BrassBulls12 said: Why don't we wait and see what happens when we don't have as many freshmen and first time starters playing before we just assume we will go 4-8 shall we? You're correct. 4-8 is probably way too optimistic. 2-10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrassBulls12 Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 399 Content Count: 4,679 Reputation: 517 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/03/2017 Share Posted November 29, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, usf97 said: You're correct. 4-8 is probably way too optimistic. 2-10 I'll take that action, how much? I'll say we are closer to 10-2 than 2-10. If you want we can just say over/under 6 wins. Don't want to put money on it? How about 1000 points, to be donated to Athletic department via the TBP member shop? Edited November 29, 2018 by BrassBulls12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted November 29, 2018 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 582 Content Count: 22,677 Reputation: 5,813 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted November 29, 2018 26 minutes ago, puc86 said: Yep. Since it was one of the strongest arguments for earlier than typical action it makes you wonder why someone with knowledge didn’t come forward with it before it grew into a frenzy. It’s kind of hard to put the genie back into the bottle. The 20 week thing may be accurate. The definition of what his base salary is seems to be the unknown. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Toro_86 Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 176 Content Count: 8,612 Reputation: 2,660 Days Won: 28 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted November 29, 2018 14 minutes ago, CousinRicky said: The 20 week thing may be accurate. The definition of what his base salary is seems to be the unknown. Are they still exploring cutting Chuckles loose or has that ship sailed? Sounds like he’s coming back with some reshuffling of assistants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrassBulls12 Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 399 Content Count: 4,679 Reputation: 517 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/03/2017 Share Posted November 29, 2018 (edited) Yeah, I'm not really sure the "letting Charlie go" option was ever considered. Which I think is the right call, but I am in the minority there. Edited November 29, 2018 by BrassBulls12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,610 Content Count: 74,511 Reputation: 10,799 Days Won: 422 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted November 29, 2018 9 minutes ago, BrassBulls12 said: Yeah, I'm not really sure the "letting Charlie go" option was ever considered. Which I think is the right call, but I am in the minority there. I doubt it was also and also doubt you're in the minority. Squeaky wheels get the most attention but doesn't mean they're the majority ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gatorbull325 Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 119 Content Count: 6,518 Reputation: 2,692 Days Won: 28 Joined: 09/02/2014 Share Posted November 29, 2018 12 minutes ago, BrassBulls12 said: Yeah, I'm not really sure the "letting Charlie go" option was ever considered. Which I think is the right call, but I am in the minority there. No i'm pro-CCS. I think Gilbert is the main person everybody is in with consensus of wanting fired. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaltLiquorBull Posted November 29, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 96 Content Count: 4,073 Reputation: 1,381 Days Won: 14 Joined: 01/09/2006 Share Posted November 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Gatorbull325 said: No i'm pro-CCS. I think Gilbert is the main person everybody is in with consensus of wanting fired. Me, too. But Charlie disappointed me last Friday. I think when we are in "what have we got to lose" mode, we should be taking every opportunity to get the W. I have to think those were HC decisions. (kneeling at end of half, punting on 4th and 1 in the second half, etc.) It's freaking Orlando in our house. Who has the most points at :00 is all that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now