Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  54
  • Content Count:  1,212
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/16/2002

Isn't the bull missing some, umm, male parts?  Even the Merrill Lynch and Schlitz bulls are more obviously male.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  30
  • Content Count:  341
  • Reputation:   19
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/02/2009

1 hour ago, Apis Bull said:

I'd even be okay with something like this:

 

USF Academic 3.png

USF Academic 2.png

100x better, correct colors and a professional font

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

8 minutes ago, 72bull said:

Isn't the bull missing some, umm, male parts?  Even the Merrill Lynch and Schlitz bulls are more obviously male.

Did you just request a pizzle on the logo of your alma mater?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  5,386
  • Reputation:   1,310
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  09/18/2005

I was really hoping this was a joke when I opened the thread.  I'm with MikeG.  We were always the Brahman type bulls until we weren't. We were always green and gold until we now aren't.  I actually hate this change and see no reason for it.  Opposite of standardization.  The non-Merrill Lynch logos generated in this thread are much better. 

Don't fix what ain't broke.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

Just now, Grateful Dad said:

We were always green and gold until we now aren't.

 

Actually, we were green and yellow first

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  5,386
  • Reputation:   1,310
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  09/18/2005

Just now, Apis Bull said:

Actually, we were green and yellow first

Yes, I forgot about that.  Well, I'm not resistant to change, as I really embraced the new U logos when they came out.  But we settled on a winner on the academic side and I see no reason to cartoon it up.  You are right but I still hate it (stomps foot).

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  58
  • Content Count:  1,828
  • Reputation:   660
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  07/09/2015

6 hours ago, 72bull said:

Isn't the bull missing some, umm, male parts?  Even the Merrill Lynch and Schlitz bulls are more obviously male.

Gender neutral bull - it is all the rage these days.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  58
  • Content Count:  3,576
  • Reputation:   858
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  08/07/2017

6 hours ago, 72bull said:

Isn't the bull missing some, umm, male parts?  Even the Merrill Lynch and Schlitz bulls are more obviously male.

I'm not the only one( who must have issues) that was wondering about the bull being anatomically correct otherwise...it's a cow! Same missing feature with the mechanical bull unless they are...gender neutral as noted bravely by ArmyBull. makes one wonder don't one??? I'll bet the original brahma was correct especially with testo CJL steering the ship.  Tough for an old guy to know what to think these days.??  Soon( and I hope not) we may be saying, Go Bovines!!   OR

Now that's what a bull should look like....Go Bull's!! That's a bad mofo right there...    Beat Ga Tech !

brahman-cattle usf.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

19 minutes ago, BulledOver said:

I'm not the only one( who must have issues) that was wondering about the bull being anatomically correct otherwise...it's a cow! Same missing feature with the mechanical bull unless they are...gender neutral as noted bravely by ArmyBull. makes one wonder don't one??? I'll bet the original brahma was correct especially with testo CJL steering the ship.  Tough for an old guy to know what to think these days.??  Soon( and I hope not) we may be saying, Go Bovines!!   OR

Now that's what a bull should look like....Go Bull's!! That's a bad mofo right there...    Beat Ga Tech !

brahman-cattle usf.jpg

The brahma was nearly two decades gone before xCJL was even hired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

26 minutes ago, BulledOver said:

I'm not the only one( who must have issues) that was wondering about the bull being anatomically correct otherwise...it's a cow! Same missing feature with the mechanical bull unless they are...gender neutral as noted bravely by ArmyBull. makes one wonder don't one??? I'll bet the original brahma was correct especially with testo CJL steering the ship.  Tough for an old guy to know what to think these days.??  Soon( and I hope not) we may be saying, Go Bovines!!   OR

Now that's what a bull should look like....Go Bull's!! That's a bad mofo right there...    Beat Ga Tech !

brahman-cattle usf.jpg

PETA ain’t gonna like someone spray painting a bull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.