NYCbull Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 20 Content Count: 194 Reputation: 63 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2013 Author Share Posted October 22, 2017 (edited) Did you guys catch bakers and jk podcast earlier in the week? Jk says something like he believes Usf will extend their 30 point streak and baker literally rolls his eyes smh Edited October 22, 2017 by NYCbull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ionbull Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,610 Reputation: 635 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/17/2015 Share Posted October 22, 2017 30 minutes ago, USFBulls727 said: 34-28 was the final, and there was plenty of danger for us at the end of that game. If Tice doesn't get that first down, who knows what might have happened. UCF beat a better team by a slightly bigger margin. We play them in a few weeks anyway. The playcall to Tice was brilliant, the defense was completely tricked. There are so many variations for run plays. 17 minutes ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said: Exactly. Being up 34-7 at one point means nothing. We squeaked out a one score victory against a team that lost to FIU. Staying at 20 is reasonable, perhaps even generous. Tulane also trounced a Tulsa team that lost to Houston and only lost to Navy in Annapolis by two. Tulane are no slouches this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Okay can we agree that if both we and UCF win this week, they won't jump us, as they play Austin Peay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 197 Content Count: 10,251 Reputation: 270 Days Won: 14 Joined: 08/16/2005 Share Posted October 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Ionbull said: The playcall to Tice was brilliant, the defense was completely tricked. There are so many variations for run plays. Tulane also trounced a Tulsa team that lost to Houston and only lost to Navy in Annapolis by two. Tulane are no slouches this year. Tulane lost to Oklahoma 56-14. They lost to FIU.If we really want to puff our chest out and ask for the country to look at us as a top 15 team, we have to kill them. Especially with our schedule as soft as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFBulls727 Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 62 Content Count: 2,286 Reputation: 495 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/26/2013 Share Posted October 22, 2017 7 minutes ago, Ionbull said: The playcall to Tice was brilliant, the defense was completely tricked. There are so many variations for run plays. Tulane also trounced a Tulsa team that lost to Houston and only lost to Navy in Annapolis by two. Tulane are no slouches this year. You mean beat Houston, something like 45-17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,090 Reputation: 10,859 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted October 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Bulls Are We said: Why do I get the feeling that if we beat UCF close, Baker would still rank them ahead of us? 1 hour ago, USFBulls727 said: No chance that happens. Even if it did, they'd still be watching the CCG from home. Perhaps he'd just drop both out of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Style Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 109 Content Count: 21,144 Reputation: 4,649 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted October 22, 2017 53 minutes ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said: They look better to the eyeball than we do. The eyeball test is key in rankings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_Bullnard_Shaw Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 55 Content Count: 6,740 Reputation: 1,743 Days Won: 17 Joined: 11/04/2012 Share Posted October 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Rocky Style said: The eyeball test is key in rankings. That's why I like computer models. No passion, no emotion, no weight for being a historic program. Just give me a conglomerate average of computer rankings like we do for hurricane models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
python815 Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 69 Content Count: 441 Reputation: 385 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/23/2011 Share Posted October 22, 2017 The credit I will give to Tulane for fighting and keeping it close is they seem like a different team on the road and at home. They were 3-0 at home and 0-3 on the road. We still went and handed them their first home loss of the year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footnfan1 Posted October 22, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 88 Content Count: 3,462 Reputation: 566 Days Won: 6 Joined: 10/14/2010 Share Posted October 22, 2017 1 hour ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said: That's why I like computer models. No passion, no emotion, no weight for being a historic program. Just give me a conglomerate average of computer rankings like we do for hurricane models. Exactly. There is a guy named Fornelli and he has his top 50. He happens to like UCF at this moment, but it is interesting. My opinion has absolutely nothing to do with the rankings There is true equality to start as math doesn't play favorites Wins and losses mean more than anything The formula is in no way predictive, it's a meritocracy I won't share the formula, but it works https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/fornelli-50-college-football-rankings-respect-clemson-as-the-nations-best-team/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now