Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Houston v Louisville


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

3 hours ago, USFBulls12 said:

So a #5 ranked G5 team can miss out on a NY6 bowl if they lose their conference championship  game to a #35 team, if that #35 team just happens to be the highest ranking G5 conference champion?

Unlikely to occur, but in that situation, yes, the #35 team would go to NY6, and the #5 team could play in the Trop.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  69
  • Content Count:  1,634
  • Reputation:   350
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/23/2007

7 hours ago, charsibb said:

Yes and no.

If a G5 is ranked #1,2,3 or 4 by the committee, they go to the playoffs regardless of whether they've won their conference or not. This doesn't affect the next criteria

If no G5 team is in the top 4, then the highest ranked G5 conference champion is guaranteed a spot in one of the non-playoff NYD bowls, even if the playoff committee ranks other G5 non-champions ahead of them.

These are two separate criteria, so it is "possible" for two G5 teams to get in (but hugely unlikely)

You are saying they are separate, but it seems they are not by the way you worded it.  Your second criterion says, "If no G5 team is in the top 4, then..."  So how can there be two G5 teams that get in? Sounds like the second criterion is only possible if the first is not.

I admit I'm only into my second sip of coffee so maybe I'm not awake enough yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Content Count:  6,744
  • Reputation:   912
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  02/17/2002

Glad we won't have to get blown out by Houston this year.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Content Count:  2,610
  • Reputation:   635
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  12/17/2015

8 hours ago, USFBulls12 said:

So a #5 ranked G5 team can miss out on a NY6 bowl if they lose their conference championship  game to a #35 team, if that #35 team just happens to be the highest ranking G5 conference champion?

I think we're overthinking this. Don't forget being a conference champion holds a ton of weight in the committee's eyes. In this scenario, the #35 team would most likely jump the #5 team in the final rankings because of their conference champion moniker. We were vaguely talking about this in the off-season for the american. If an undefeated houston lost to a 1 or 2 loss USF in he conference championship; Houston effectively loses twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,615
  • Content Count:  74,669
  • Reputation:   10,888
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

10 hours ago, USFBulls12 said:

So a #5 ranked G5 team can miss out on a NY6 bowl if they lose their conference championship  game to a #35 team, if that #35 team just happens to be the highest ranking G5 conference champion?

Does the Committee even rank past 25 unless they have to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

1 hour ago, Triple B said:

Does the Committee even rank past 25 unless they have to?

If they do, they don't publish it

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

4 hours ago, Boomer said:

You are saying they are separate, but it seems they are not by the way you worded it.  Your second criterion says, "If no G5 team is in the top 4, then..."  So how can there be two G5 teams that get in? Sounds like the second criterion is only possible if the first is not.

I admit I'm only into my second sip of coffee so maybe I'm not awake enough yet...

Yeah. Even after editing that post, I wasn't very happy about how it came out. They are mutually exclusive, and I shouldn't post so late at night lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  119
  • Content Count:  6,562
  • Reputation:   2,740
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  09/02/2014

3 hours ago, lotsofbull99 said:

Glad we won't have to get blown out by Houston this year.

We did happen to beat the team that neat them and should beat the other team that beat them. Man, cut the Bulls some slack man lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

6 minutes ago, Apis Bull said:

If they do, they don't publish it

This.

They certainly do, since they won't all agree on the teams that should be included, but they're not about to tell us.

In any event, we're talking hypothetically about an event so rare as to include a one loss non champion and 5 multi loss champions such that all of them are so far behind the one that the rankers couldn't possibly jump them past. Technically possible but statistically unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  153
  • Content Count:  3,034
  • Reputation:   150
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  08/23/2008

Thou shall not covet thy rivals D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.