JTrue Posted September 26, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 26, 2014 (edited) Maryland is a better team than Wisconsin and we should have won that game... Whaaaaaaa?? Hahaha. I want to hear his take on Mike White. Nothing wrong with a little homerism. Indeed. Do not confuse acute homerism with objective analysis. Remember, as a fan, you're exempt from the constraints of reality and are afforded the luxury of green-n-gold goggles as a permanent fashion accessory. How is saying we should have won the MD game is homerism? Take away two of the botched special teams plays and we would have won. Maryland is a better team than Wisconsin mumbo jumbo. That's not even homerism. It's just silly. Why do you think that? Maryland's only loss is to one of the best teams in the Big 12 by 3 points. We'll find out who's better in a month or so when they play. Why do I think Wisconsin is better than Maryland? Because Maryland could have easily lost to us. Edited September 26, 2014 by JTrue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsfan1983 Posted September 26, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 839 Reputation: 125 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/17/2013 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Maryland is a much better team than us. Wisconsin is better than Maryland. You can point to a couple of plays that could have gone our way in the Maryland as to why we didn't win a close one. Maryland can point to 6 turnovers as to why they didn't win by 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great 8 Posted September 26, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 69 Content Count: 3,802 Reputation: 372 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/21/2009 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Maryland is a much better team than us. Wisconsin is better than Maryland. You can point to a couple of plays that could have gone our way in the Maryland as to why we didn't win a close one. Maryland can point to 6 turnovers as to why they didn't win by 30. Sigh. Your point here is almost as offbase as DC's about Wisky < Maryland. Those weren't unforced turnovers. We held guys like Diggs down. The D came to play that day. I don't know that Maryland is "much better" than us, quite yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted September 26, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 148 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Maryland is a much better team than us. Wisconsin is better than Maryland. You can point to a couple of plays that could have gone our way in the Maryland as to why we didn't win a close one. Maryland can point to 6 turnovers as to why they didn't win by 30. Sigh. Your point here is almost as offbase as DC's about Wisky < Maryland. Those weren't unforced turnovers. We held guys like Diggs down. The D came to play that day. I don't know that Maryland is "much better" than us, quite yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsfan1983 Posted September 26, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 839 Reputation: 125 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/17/2013 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Maryland is a much better team than us. Wisconsin is better than Maryland. You can point to a couple of plays that could have gone our way in the Maryland as to why we didn't win a close one. Maryland can point to 6 turnovers as to why they didn't win by 30. Sigh. Your point here is almost as offbase as DC's about Wisky < Maryland. Those weren't unforced turnovers. We held guys like Diggs down. The D came to play that day. I don't know that Maryland is "much better" than us, quite yet. Maybe much better is an overstatement, but if we play that game 10 times we probably lose 9 of them and most by more than a 7 point margin. Forcing 6 turnovers with 1 returned for a touchdown and being +5 in turnover margin and still losing the game at home pretty much says we have a long way to go toward being respectable. Sure they were "forced" turnovers, but still not something that can be counted on to keep us in games going forward. After the 5 turnovers that weren't returned for TDs we scored a grand total of 0 points. Maryland turned it over several times when they were driving in position to get points. I don't know what in the second half showed that if we don't have a punt blocked for a touchdown maybe we win the game. We still had no way to move the ball or score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls1181 Posted September 26, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 170 Content Count: 5,722 Reputation: 366 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/03/2011 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Maryland is a better team than Wisconsin and we should have won that game... Whaaaaaaa?? Hahaha. I want to hear his take on Mike White. Nothing wrong with a little homerism. Indeed. Do not confuse acute homerism with objective analysis. Remember, as a fan, you're exempt from the constraints of reality and are afforded the luxury of green-n-gold goggles as a permanent fashion accessory. How is saying we should have won the MD game is homerism? Take away two of the botched special teams plays and we would have won. Maryland is a better team than Wisconsin mumbo jumbo. That's not even homerism. It's just silly. Why do you think that? Maryland's only loss is to one of the best teams in the Big 12 by 3 points. We'll find out who's better in a month or so when they play. West Virginia is one of the best teams in the Big 12? They may not even be a Top 5 team in the Big 12 at this juncture. I think Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Baylor, Kansas State, and TCU would have something to say about your claim. IMO its Oklahoma, Baylor and everybody else.....WV is a 2nd or 3rd tier team in that conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigAppleBucky Posted September 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 26 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/21/2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 (edited) One of the good qualities about the Bulls I've seen Wisconsin people mention is your positive turnover margin. Go to the end of this as most of it is a recap of the last game. Wisconsin does have some shortage of depth at running back. Both true freshmen, who were expected to play, have been injured. Edited September 27, 2014 by BigAppleBucky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted September 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Just placed $1000 (to win $900) on the 51 over. I think Wiscy wants to run up the score, and I think we score 14-17, perhaps much of it late. Perfect world, USF 28- Wiscy 24 Dare to dream. But this way I can bet on Bulls without picking them to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted September 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Just placed $1000 (to win $900) on the 51 over. I think Wiscy wants to run up the score, and I think we score 14-17, perhaps much of it late. Perfect world, USF 28- Wiscy 24 Dare to dream. But this way I can bet on Bulls without picking them to lose. I must have a guardian angel. In setting the bet, sportsbook.ag had some issue with my credit card and did not accept my deposit. No bet. This should be a lesson for me to avoid betting...especially anything on USF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatDaddyBull Posted September 27, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 34 Content Count: 2,166 Reputation: 225 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/09/2012 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Just placed $1000 (to win $900) on the 51 over. I think Wiscy wants to run up the score, and I think we score 14-17, perhaps much of it late. Perfect world, USF 28- Wiscy 24 Dare to dream. But this way I can bet on Bulls without picking them to lose. I must have a guardian angel. In setting the bet, sportsbook.ag had some issue with my credit card and did not accept my deposit. No bet. This should be a lesson for me to avoid betting...especially anything on USF. Wow, technological errors save the day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now