I was wrong!

[TallyBull]

Definitely agree we should be seeing SOME progress. Haven't seen really any yet.

Thought I saw some improvement against MD but we took two huge steps back today.

[snarling Bull]

25% completion rate and he remains your starter.

Why has he cast Bench to the curb. Anyone know

[GaUSFBull]

Definitely agree we should be seeing SOME progress. Haven't seen really any yet.

Thought I saw some improvement against MD but we took two huge steps back today.

You're right; defensively we saw some last week. It was like a completely different defensive effort today. A pisspoor one, in fact.

[Who'sYourData?]

 

How can a school like ours, who recruits top 50 classes nationally, suk so much asss? Inexcusable that we can't coach these kids better.

Because it is one class. The team is young. How on earth when everyone admits that SH ran the team into the ground did anyone possibly think it would turn around already??

 

 

Now it is one class.  For months people have been telling me that everyone in last year's class belongs to Taggart.  That would be two classes.

 

But I think his real point is that we have been recruiting Top 50ish classes for ten years or so, not just the last one or two.

[SANJAY]

Recruiting rankings per Rivals (for what they're worth)

2010- #62 (This year's RS Seniors)

2011- #64 (This year's RS Juniors or true seniors)

2012 - #49 (This year's RS Sophomores or true juniors)

2013- #49 (This year's RS freshmen or true sophomores)

2014- #39 (True freshmen)

[Who'sYourData?]

Recruiting rankings per Rivals (for what they're worth)

2010- #62 (This year's RS Seniors)

2011- #64 (This year's RS Juniors or true seniors)

2012 - #49 (This year's RS Sophomores or true juniors)

2013- #49 (This year's RS freshmen or true sophomores)

2014- #39 (True freshmen)

 

You would think it would be difficult to turn that into a team ranked 111.

[Bulls On Parade]

Recruiting rankings per Rivals (for what they're worth)

2010- #62 (This year's RS Seniors)

2011- #64 (This year's RS Juniors or true seniors)

2012 - #49 (This year's RS Sophomores or true juniors)

2013- #49 (This year's RS freshmen or true sophomores)

2014- #39 (True freshmen)

You would think it would be difficult to turn that into a team ranked 111.

They make it look easy.

[SANJAY]

Yes we are worse than our recruiting rankings, but we're getting nothing from our upper classmen. Lot of freshmen and sophomores in the 2 deep. The one place they are not as prevalent are the O and D lines where guys need a couple years to develop (more so on the O line than D). The O line (with 3 senior starters) is also our worst performing unit on the field, which is really saying something.

[Sellular1]

These kids are taught a different style of football in high school so for one they have to relearn assignments and reads and two you don't know if they will fit because all your tape is on a different style. It's like they learned Spanish in school and Taggart wants them speaking French.

CWT needs a spread offense and 4-3 defense and take advantage of the talent he has on the team.

Have you not seen what happens to France in battle?

[deters-]

 

These kids are taught a different style of football in high school so for one they have to relearn assignments and reads and two you don't know if they will fit because all your tape is on a different style. It's like they learned Spanish in school and Taggart wants them speaking French.

CWT needs a spread offense and 4-3 defense and take advantage of the talent he has on the team.

Have you not seen what happens to France in battle?

 

So you're saying its not a coincidence that their pants are brown?