Fold FB Invest in BB Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 76 Content Count: 6,712 Reputation: 1,131 Days Won: 17 Joined: 09/07/2009 Share Posted July 25, 2014 That's what I was saying originally. Hamilton and Senat are bigger bodies more suited to this scheme but still on the light side if their weights on gousfbulls.com are correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRBULL Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 37 Content Count: 431 Reputation: 35 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/11/2006 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Yep, I thought I heard some good things after he moved back from the OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Are the LBs recruited prior to Taggart not cutting it enough that people are putting redshirts and freshmen ahead of most of them? Yup... I think Vincent Jackson will see significant playing time as a true freshman at the Buck LB position. I'm willing to bet he opens up behind Cliett at #2 on the depth chart there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted July 25, 2014 That's what I was saying originally. Hamilton and Senat are bigger bodies more suited to this scheme but still on the light side if their weights on gousfbulls.com are correct. You think 311 and 318 are on the light side? Here were there weights as of spring http://www.gousfbulls.com/SportSelect.dbml?SPSID=37330&SPID=2981&DB_LANG=C&DB_OEM_ID=7700&SORT_ORDER=6&Q_SEASON=2014&PRINTABLE_PAGE= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fold FB Invest in BB Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 76 Content Count: 6,712 Reputation: 1,131 Days Won: 17 Joined: 09/07/2009 Share Posted July 25, 2014 (edited) That's what I was saying originally. Hamilton and Senat are bigger bodies more suited to this scheme but still on the light side if their weights on gousfbulls.com are correct. You think 311 and 318 are on the light side? Here were there weights as of spring http://www.gousfbulls.com/SportSelect.dbml?SPSID=37330&SPID=2981&DB_LANG=C&DB_OEM_ID=7700&SORT_ORDER=6&Q_SEASON=2014&PRINTABLE_PAGE=Yes. I'd feel better about 330. If you're going to eat space, eat a lot of it. Look at our OL. I'm betting Thor and Brynjar can move those guys consistently. Edited July 25, 2014 by Bullphin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm101 Posted July 25, 2014 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 173 Content Count: 7,008 Reputation: 2,262 Days Won: 12 Joined: 06/11/2010 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Winners, fighters, people with bull pride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWMJD Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 93 Content Count: 3,048 Reputation: 316 Days Won: 6 Joined: 11/24/2005 Share Posted July 25, 2014 You're grasping at straws. I honestly don't think you knew we were running the 3-4 this year to be honest. You likely thought the 3-4 was a training fad for camp which is understandable... but it wasn't and that is not what that statement was referring to. It's easy to tell. I mean nobody refers to the NT as the DT... he could see time in the DT rotation... whatever... I call BS. I just corrected a wrong with someone who doesn't want to admit that they dks. Umm... you do realize that I wasn't a part of the whole DT vs. NT thing originally, right? I was just commenting on your rant to the other couple guys involved that there was some magical distinction between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWMJD Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 93 Content Count: 3,048 Reputation: 316 Days Won: 6 Joined: 11/24/2005 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Raider fan here... No we did not run the 4-3 when he was with Oakland. I'm from the bay area (not tampa though I did cross the land to go to school at usf). We ran the 3-4 when he was our coordinator. I mean you literally just made that up. I would be silent but you're spreading that as gospel. I don't know about the Bengals so I'll give you that. But the entire time he was with the Raiders, which was very short, we ran the 3-4. We ran it in the Super Bowl when the Bucs whipped us. But yeah... that part of your statement is BS so I'll take the rest with a grain of salt. In his most recent stint with the Raiders (2011) he ran a 4-3 defense: "The Raiders have been a 4-3 defense since 2003." (http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1043079-oakland-raiders-defensive-problems-may-not-be-fixed-by-3-4) That article was written in early 2012. He DID, however, run a 3-4 I'm his first stint with the them. Hence my statement that he ran a 4-3 at least part of his time in Oakland. Preach us more of your football gospel, bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Share Posted July 25, 2014 nose tackle, now THAT, has a certain ring to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Toro_86 Posted July 25, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 176 Content Count: 8,612 Reputation: 2,661 Days Won: 28 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Hey Monte....what are you hearing about Bruce Hector? Thought I heard some good things about him in the spring. Didn't see him on your depth chart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now