slick1ru2 Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 553 Content Count: 14,405 Reputation: 434 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted February 26, 2013 @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Ouch... " The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the coming months. " @HemUnit: @JFowlerCBS HEY FOWLER, USF IS THAT 3rd ANCHOR. Thanks for leaving us out, AGAIN! @JFowlerCBS: @HemUnit That's a good call. Wasn't intentional. And I think it's fair. Will tweak. Still hasn't "tweaked" it. Lol He probably thought about how Hem pointed it out and decided, "Screw you". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,612 Content Count: 74,568 Reputation: 10,838 Days Won: 423 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted February 26, 2013 @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Ouch... " The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the coming months. " @HemUnit: @JFowlerCBS HEY FOWLER, USF IS THAT 3rd ANCHOR. Thanks for leaving us out, AGAIN! @JFowlerCBS: @HemUnit That's a good call. Wasn't intentional. And I think it's fair. Will tweak. Still hasn't "tweaked" it. Lol He probably thought about how Hem pointed it out and decided, "Screw you". Or thought about it and couldn't justify us being included as an anchor ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 197 Content Count: 10,251 Reputation: 270 Days Won: 14 Joined: 08/16/2005 Share Posted February 26, 2013 How are we not an anchor. We're practically at the bottom of every sports standing in the league... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 553 Content Count: 14,405 Reputation: 434 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Someone tell Navy they can bring this when they join. We need all the incentive we can get to get them in here. I am starting to think the addition of Memphis and Tulane was to insure they have at least 2 wins a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I could care less. Just want him to know that people notice, and bother him about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-by-Marriage Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 355 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted February 26, 2013 (edited) The problem with being in the ACC is now you've been inside everyone the ACC has been with... awrite, now that's just funny! And they've been with SCum, not exactly the cleanest. Edited February 26, 2013 by Bull-by-Marriage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted February 26, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 582 Content Count: 22,680 Reputation: 5,816 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Someone tell Navy they can bring this when they join. We need all the incentive we can get to get them in here. I am starting to think the addition of Memphis and Tulane was to insure they have at least 2 wins a season. Will that be the trophy for our annual "rivalry" game with Navy? Loser gets it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-by-Marriage Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 355 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Does anyone "know" any new details? Have the presidents accepted the deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Does anyone "know" any new details? Have the presidents accepted the deal? Maybe they brought Tater Head back as a "special" consultant to conduct the vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted February 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Articles all said vote could be held "as early as" Monday. I'm guessing they've asked for clarification on two things: - what are the details of the differences in promotions under the two vendors, and - what exactly does the "right to match" mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now