usfvictor Posted February 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 761 Reputation: 45 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/09/2011 Author Share Posted February 24, 2013 If our conference winds up crappy like the MWC, we could be the Boise State of the east coast. Thats what im hoping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Winning will cure everything. Not in terms of moving to another conference. It will not hurt but it is not the magic bullet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallyBull Posted February 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,685 Reputation: 1,186 Days Won: 14 Joined: 01/19/2011 Share Posted February 24, 2013 In 2011, ESPN offered a new nine-year deal to the Big East worth $1.17 billion or an average of $130 million annually. However, the Big East's presidents voted to turn down the deal that would have earned football members nearly $14 million a year Isn't this pretty much a moot point considering the 16 teams leaving the conference since it was offered? The contract would have been torn up, wouldn't it? That's a good point but it doesn't fit the ESPN narrative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quo Vadis Posted February 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 160 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/09/2012 Share Posted February 24, 2013 (edited) In 2011, ESPN offered a new nine-year deal to the Big East worth $1.17 billion or an average of $130 million annually. However, the Big East's presidents voted to turn down the deal that would have earned football members nearly $14 million a year Isn't this pretty much a moot point considering the 16 teams leaving the conference since it was offered? The contract would have been torn up, wouldn't it? That's a good point but it doesn't fit the ESPN narrative. It is a point but i wouldn't stretch it too far. First, had we been making $14 million per school per year, who would have left? All the schools that went to Power 5 conferences, sure. But would Boise and SDSU have left for the MWC? Nope, so the conference would have been more valuable than it is now. Heck, at that money, we probably snare BYU as well. Second, even if the exact same schools left, these "look in" clauses allow some degree of renegotiation but they don't allow a conference or ESPN to just tear up the whole contract. Even with the radical change in membership, it seems highly unlikely ESPN could alter that contract down to anywhere near $2 million per school. Maybe $5 million? Edited February 24, 2013 by BatonRougeBull87 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-by-Marriage Posted February 24, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 355 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Contact does not allow counter offer. >Where does everyone get te idea that every Big East game will be regulated online to ESPN3? Nothing being reported suggests that. My points are that there is no indication that we will not have other than Thursday night games, and why is Foxsports1 be any better than NBCSports? I'm seriously not trying to argue, I just don't think that it's a better deal as it stands now, "knowing" what we know. And we wonder why the trophies are misspelled. Your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted February 25, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted February 25, 2013 @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted February 25, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted February 25, 2013 @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Ouch... " The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the coming months. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted February 25, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted February 25, 2013 @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Ouch... " The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the coming months. " USF would also prefer to be in the ACC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted February 25, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Ouch... " The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the coming months. " @HemUnit: @JFowlerCBS HEY FOWLER, USF IS THAT 3rd ANCHOR. Thanks for leaving us out, AGAIN! @JFowlerCBS: @HemUnit That's a good call. Wasn't intentional. And I think it's fair. Will tweak. Edited February 25, 2013 by Hem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted February 25, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted February 25, 2013 @JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7 Ouch... " The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the coming months. " @HemUnit: @JFowlerCBS HEY FOWLER, USF IS THAT 3rd ANCHOR. Thanks for leaving us out, AGAIN! @JFowlerCBS: @HemUnit That's a good call. Wasn't intentional. And I think it's fair. Will tweak. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now