Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Big East TV Deal


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  18
  • Content Count:  761
  • Reputation:   45
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/09/2011

If our conference winds up crappy like the MWC, we could be the Boise State of the east coast.

green-fireworks-11290605958L8F.jpg

Thats what im hoping

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

Winning will cure everything.

Not in terms of moving to another conference. It will not hurt but it is not the magic bullet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  23
  • Content Count:  3,685
  • Reputation:   1,186
  • Days Won:  14
  • Joined:  01/19/2011

In 2011, ESPN offered a new nine-year deal to the Big East worth $1.17 billion or an average of $130 million annually. However, the Big East's presidents voted to turn down the deal that would have earned football members nearly $14 million a year

Isn't this pretty much a moot point considering the 16 teams leaving the conference since it was offered? The contract would have been torn up, wouldn't it?

That's a good point but it doesn't fit the ESPN narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Content Count:  160
  • Reputation:   13
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/09/2012

 

In 2011, ESPN offered a new nine-year deal to the Big East worth $1.17 billion or an average of $130 million annually. However, the Big East's presidents voted to turn down the deal that would have earned football members nearly $14 million a year

Isn't this pretty much a moot point considering the 16 teams leaving the conference since it was offered? The contract would have been torn up, wouldn't it?

That's a good point but it doesn't fit the ESPN narrative.

It is a point but i wouldn't stretch it too far. First, had we been making $14 million per school per year, who would have left? All the schools that went to Power 5 conferences, sure. But would Boise and SDSU have left for the MWC? Nope, so the conference would have been more valuable than it is now. Heck, at that money, we probably snare BYU as well.

 

Second, even if the exact same schools left, these "look in" clauses allow some degree of renegotiation but they don't allow a conference or ESPN to just tear up the whole contract. Even with the radical change in membership, it seems highly unlikely ESPN could alter that contract down to anywhere near $2 million per school. Maybe $5 million?

Edited by BatonRougeBull87
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  355
  • Content Count:  4,741
  • Reputation:   127
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  02/25/2004

Contact does not allow counter offer.

>Where does everyone get te idea that every Big East game will be

regulated online to ESPN3? Nothing being reported suggests that.

My points are that there is no indication that we will not have other

than Thursday night games, and why is Foxsports1 be any better than

NBCSports? I'm seriously not trying to argue, I just don't think that

it's a better deal as it stands now, "knowing" what we know.

And we wonder why the trophies are misspelled.

 

 

Your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  4,663
  • Reputation:   401
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  09/24/2012

@JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

@JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7

 

Ouch...

 

"

The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join

the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the

coming months.

"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

@JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7

 

Ouch...

 

"

The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join

the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the

coming months.

"

 

USF would also prefer to be in the ACC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  4,663
  • Reputation:   401
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  09/24/2012

@JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7

Ouch...

"

The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join

the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the

coming months.

"

@HemUnit: @JFowlerCBS HEY FOWLER, USF IS THAT 3rd ANCHOR. Thanks for leaving us out, AGAIN!

@JFowlerCBS: @HemUnit That's a good call. Wasn't intentional. And I think it's fair. Will tweak.

Edited by Hem
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

 

@JFowlerCBS: First TV deal, now name change for Big East? Potential provision for marketing a new name was part of negotiations http://t.co/DpaXaobyl7

Ouch...

"

The conference's anchors, UConn and Cincinnati, would prefer to join

the ACC. The league will add Navy in 2014 and could include Tulsa in the

coming months.

"

@HemUnit: @JFowlerCBS HEY FOWLER, USF IS THAT 3rd ANCHOR. Thanks for leaving us out, AGAIN!

@JFowlerCBS: @HemUnit That's a good call. Wasn't intentional. And I think it's fair. Will tweak.

 

 

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.