Jump to content

Hi Guest,

In our efforts to raise funds for USF Football, the site is giving away a football season full of ad-free surfing at The Bulls Pen.

Would you consider buying a ticket or two to the raffle that will award this to you or a fellow member of the board?

Each ticket purchase goes directly to our effort to raise $10K in "fan money" for the program.  Below is the link:

The Bulls Pen Ad-free Raffle in support of USF Football

Thank you,

Brad Brad
  • Join Today

    Join today and reduce ads presented

  • Members do not see this ad, Register today
NewEnglandBull

Blake Barnett Ranked #44 QB in CFB

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

 

Edited by NewEnglandBull

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...it could be worse, Brett Kean is ranked #90.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need Barnett to finish in the top 15 statistically when it is all said and done. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shouldn't an Alabama transfer be ranked higher?  :furious3:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bullstampede9922 said:

Shouldn't an Alabama transfer be ranked higher?  :furious3:

Key word is “transfer” 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most inaccurate report to date!!!  Justin Fields has only taken a few college snaps and he is in the to 20.  Sam Ehlinger in a runner and he is 6th. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Corey lea said:

Most inaccurate report to date!!!  Justin Fields has only taken a few college snaps and he is in the to 20.  Sam Ehlinger in a runner and he is 6th. 

Ehlinger had a better statistical season last year than Justin Herbert, both passing AND running. So what makes Ehlinger's ranking inaccurate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Idk if anyone watched Ehlinger but he is pretty good, 6th is probably about right. I think there could be a case for him at 4 

Edited by BrassBulls12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BrassBulls12 said:

Idk if anyone watched Ehlinger but he is pretty good, 6th is probably about right. I think there could be a case for him at 4 

No kidding. That's why I asked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JTrue said:

No kidding. That's why I asked.

Yeah, now after looking at the list, I think the only thing inaccurate about SE's ranking is that he isn't number four. No way King and Fine are better than him. There is a clear cut gap between 1-3 and the rest though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Members do not see this ad, Register today


×
×
  • Create New...